Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
EAGLE
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jan 10, 2021 18:34:00   #
kfoo Loc: Arkansas
 
First attempt at eagle shot. 300mm, 1/500 @f18, ISO 800. What did i do wrong. Thanks in advance.


(Download)

Reply
Jan 10, 2021 18:36:27   #
SonyA580 Loc: FL in the winter & MN in the summer
 
Camera focused on something other than the bird.

Reply
Jan 10, 2021 18:39:50   #
kfoo Loc: Arkansas
 
There was nothing else in the frame except the tree.

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2021 18:44:34   #
kfoo Loc: Arkansas
 
Nikon D7100 Nikkor 55-300 1:4.5-5.6G ED Lens. DX.

Reply
Jan 10, 2021 18:53:30   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
How far, how much of a crop? You can't always get what you can see as sharply as you wish unless you can get closer or have longer lens.

Reply
Jan 10, 2021 18:59:37   #
Reconvic Loc: clermont Fl
 
Eagle appears backlit, shutter speed needs to be higher (too much light), aperture needs to be at lowest setting since you only want to capture eagle. You're working at an extreme deficit any time the light (sun) is coming in behind your target. I don't know why the eagle appears out of focus...

Reply
Jan 10, 2021 19:16:30   #
Iron Sight Loc: Utah
 
Camera may have moved when you snapped the shot.
If hand held try 1/000-1/2000 shutter speed.
May want a larger F stop aperture at the higher shutter speed.

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2021 19:36:56   #
kfoo Loc: Arkansas
 
THANKS!

Reply
Jan 11, 2021 04:29:19   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
The softness seems to be a mixture of high ISO noise and motion blur. Shooting wide open would have allowed a lower ISO and a faster shutter speed as well. Even if you wanted extreme depth of field, f/18 would be unnecessarily high in most situations, and in this situation you don't need much in the way of DOF.

With good camera-holding skills, 1/500 sec. would be enough, but unless you know how to avoid camera shake and have well developed camera-holding skills, something faster would be a good idea at that level of zoom. The full frame equivalent of a 300mm (DX) focal length is 450mm, so 1/500 is close to the recommended limit (1/FF equiv. focal length) - and that's for somebody with good camera-holding skills. Other than using a tripod or monopod, other tactics include finding something like a tree to lean against or finding something to rest the camera on.

Reply
Jan 11, 2021 05:30:43   #
J-SPEIGHT Loc: Akron, Ohio
 
kfoo wrote:
First attempt at eagle shot. 300mm, 1/500 @f18, ISO 800. What did i do wrong. Thanks in advance.


Nice shot

Reply
Jan 11, 2021 08:18:44   #
SonyA580 Loc: FL in the winter & MN in the summer
 
kfoo wrote:
There was nothing else in the frame except the tree.


Exactly my point. Camera may have focused at infinity because the focus point was off to one side or the other.

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2021 09:16:44   #
Moondoggie Loc: Southern California
 
I’ve had similar issues. I changed my metering to spot and continuous auto focus. Just my thoughts.

Reply
Jan 11, 2021 09:42:21   #
Rashid Abdu Loc: Ohio
 
f18 is too small. Larger aperture would have allowed less iso. Focus not on the eagle. Should have a 2+ compensation to avoid the dark side of the eagle. Tripod would have been a big bonus.

Reply
Jan 11, 2021 12:09:14   #
jimvanells Loc: Augusta, GA
 
With 300 mm focused at infinity, you don't need any more depth of field than f4. Eagles sitting require 1/1000 and flying, 1/2000 to stop any movement. In your case I suspect it was camera movement.

Reply
Jan 11, 2021 15:32:37   #
kfoo Loc: Arkansas
 
Thanks for the info. I did not have a chance to use tripod, was shooting out of car window on road. Not much time!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.