The only adult in the room.
gorgehiker wrote:
Yeah, that is why a moderate beat AOC for a position on a House committee two days ago.
Rep. Kathleen Rice has captured a prized seat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee after a contentious showdown with fellow New Yorker, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
I agree with both your comment and the sentiment of the one to which you responded. AOC is the loud voice of the radical left and she is advertising her radicalism as the future of the Democrat party. The left are suddenly aware of the chasm that has formed in their base, dividing those with a modicum of respect for a free capitalist society from those in AOC's camp that simply do not. The great fear for the sane Democrats (a phrase only granted credence by comparison to the abjectly IN-sane) is that if AOC and her ilk keep yammering on, the centrist v**e will sway to the GOP in opposition to the rhetoric of the radicals in the DEM tent.
I'll go on record here and make a prediction, no three predictions.
1) If Tulsi Gabbard runs again in 2024, it will be in the Republican primary.
2) West Virginia (D) Senator Joe Manchin will v**e with the Republicans on all large issues if the Senate (dear God, no) swings 50-50, preventing radical policy from passing the Senate, and effectively making the threat of a Kamala Harris tie breaking v**e moot.
3) It will also mean he runs a a Republican in his next re-e******n campaign, if he runs again.
49south wrote:
Overall, we rate Newsmax Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and p***********e as well as numerous failed fact checks.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsmax/The Factcheck rating is based on if the Left agrees with you or not.
On the Factcheck website, They called Newsmax questionable because some of their advertisers products offered, "...higher energy with less fatigue."
They called Newsmax Right biased because they reported a NASA report on G****l W*****g about 5 years ago.
Here is an excerpt,
"So, has anyone stopped to ask . . . how much has the globe actually warmed? Well, we asked, and what we found was striking. According to NASA’s own data via Remote Sensing Systems(RSS), the world has warmed a mere .36 degrees Fahrenheit over the last 35 years (they started measuring the data in 1979). Hardly anything to panic about; however, that does mean the world is warmer, right?
The problem with that argument is that we experienced the bulk of that warming between 1979 and 1998 . . . since then, we’ve actually had temperatures DROPPING! As can be seen in this chart, we haven’t seen any g****l w*****g for 17 years."
This is heresy! It doesn't fit the Left's scenario. As you can see, you can't question any of the Left's 'settled science'. In this case it makes you a Right-biased "Climate Denier". So, shut up.
dpullum wrote:
Idaholver, helpful if you give some comment regard... (
show quote)
You seem to be under the mis -conception that Trump is not our president while still is. H**e to break the news to you.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.