"Where's The Beef?"
Dec 3, 2020 15:13:58 #
Oops. I think this counts as the real evidence that 'doesn't exist'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVP_60Hm4P8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVP_60Hm4P8
Dec 3, 2020 15:34:20 #
“Real evidence” is what Trump’s attorney’s present to a judge in a court.
Dec 3, 2020 16:25:24 #
skylane5sp wrote:
Oops. I think this counts as the real evidence that 'doesn't exist'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVP_60Hm4P8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVP_60Hm4P8
F**e news; just thought I would save time and get it started
Dec 3, 2020 18:26:14 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
“Real evidence” is what Trump’s attorney’s present to a judge in a court.
So WTF do you want? Sworn affidavits don't seem to cut it. Here's actually video of illegal activity and you still discount it?
Dec 3, 2020 18:47:36 #
I found a clip through Google just now (3:30 west coast USA time) from a reporter covering the hearings for Fox 5 Atlanta. She said Georgia's Secretary of State had previously "debunked" that surveillance video clip. That's all I got from that source.
My first question: is it reasonable to believe the workers were too stupid to know they were being videotaped as they went about their law breaking? (which is similar to my questions about the truck driver in PA: if there was fraud going on, wouldn't "they" have been a bit more careful about witnesses, including that they made this particular driver wait six hours and then re-routed him in an "unusual" manner, all the while carrying hot proof of wrongdoing?)
I'll save further questions 'til cross examination, Your Honor 😋
My first question: is it reasonable to believe the workers were too stupid to know they were being videotaped as they went about their law breaking? (which is similar to my questions about the truck driver in PA: if there was fraud going on, wouldn't "they" have been a bit more careful about witnesses, including that they made this particular driver wait six hours and then re-routed him in an "unusual" manner, all the while carrying hot proof of wrongdoing?)
I'll save further questions 'til cross examination, Your Honor 😋
Dec 3, 2020 19:04:50 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
I found a clip through Google just now (3:30 west ... (show quote)
Trump’s pre-e******n predictions of a “r****d” e******n if he lost, backfired on him. Because of his pre-e******n rhetoric e******n officials from top to bottom knew the process would be closely scrutinized, and the results questioned; and thus were more careful to do everything according to the rules, and proper procedures.
So, NO—-workers knew they were being watched and videotaped, and didn’t make such obvious mistakes. If tapes like this had merit, they would be given weight in court, and the judges would rule in Trump’s favor. That is not happening because the tapes are easily produced, prove nothing, and are worthless in a court of law.
Trump is trying to o*******w an e******n through unfounded, baseless allegations. While his cult followers are believing, the legal courts are not buying any of it.
Dec 3, 2020 19:07:28 #
skylane5sp wrote:
So WTF do you want? Sworn affidavits don't seem to cut it. Here's actually video of illegal activity and you still discount it?
It matters not what you or I want, or think. We have courts and legal proceedings that are deciding this issue.
We should trust our courts.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.