Is there anything on Earth that has not been photographed?
Oh yes. Many places.
But I understand the thought of your question.
Smudgey
Loc: Ohio, Calif, Now Arizona
Maybe not, but it doesn't matter, everyone has a different prospective in shooting the shot. Today with digital photography, it's what you do with the photo that demonstrates your artistic point of view.
It's all about the light. The subject is secondary ๐
.
Linda From Maine wrote:
It's all about the light. The subject is secondary ๐
.
I'll go with the subject being primary myself.
Great light, blah subject, ... wuff.
It's hard to get great light at high noon, but if that's the only time I can be at a place, I'll work with it.
Longshadow wrote:
I'll go with the subject being primary myself.
Great light, blah subject, ... wuff.
It's hard to get great light at high noon, but if that's the only time I can be at a place, I'll work with it.
If it's a "blah" subject, I probably wouldn't be shooting it, period ๐
Shooting the light:
water and ice, on Flickr
Like I said, work with it.
Subject is, well, subjective, isn't it.
Expanding on Smudgey's comments: whether one is interested in creative editing or not, when taking photos of an iconic subject if you want something other than the postcard shot, think about what you haven't seen.
That might be a lower angle, a stark silhouette, an extreme close-up, a distant or wide-angle view that shows the subject's impact on the landscape, city, etc.
Weather conditions: embrace fog or rain for the mystery and unique pov.
No John, there will never be a photograph of everything in every fleeting moment of light, or mood or story ๐ค
I want to thank all the thoughtful replies. They show photography to be multi-dimensional of which the scene is just one. When the scene is primary the photographer is recording history. In many other circumstances the photographer is recording a statement in the broadest sense of the word. In some other circumstances the statement is pure artistry.
Longshadow wrote:
I'll go with the subject being primary myself.
Great light, blah subject, ... wuff.
It's hard to get great light at high noon, but if that's the only time I can be at a place, I'll work with it.
Not for me. Subjects matter somewhat but Iโm unlikely to even unbag my camera at high noon. If the elements for a very decent photograph are not present, Iโm not making any photograph at all.
Acoarst thaz for personal work. I routinely performed minor miracles when paid. But for personal, minor doesnโt motivate me. Gotta have the whole enchilada.
Was in a parking lot waiting for someone when I realized that a phone is like a sketch pad and the light was good ... so while I waited I sketched whatever was lit, regardless of subjects available. Pretty much a 270deg sweep of one location.
.
User ID wrote:
Not for me. Subjects matter somewhat but Iโm unlikely to even unbag my camera at high noon. If the elements for a very decent photograph are not present, Iโm not making any photograph at all.
Acoarst thaz for personal work. I routinely performed minor miracles when paid. But for personal, minor doesnโt motivate me. Gotta have the whole enchilada.
Well, when I went to Iceland, I
didn't care where the sun was when I shot, or if it was out!
I shot wherever I was and whenever I was there. Rain, snow, WIND. This was for personal work.
The
main element for shooting was there, Iceland.
Iceland motivated me.
Acoarst, thaz just
MY preference.
Oh, and the sun wasn't visible a lot.
John_F wrote:
Is there anything on Earth that has not been photographed?
Not everything needs to be photographed! A fellow in my unit in 'Nam had a big pair of red lips tattooed on his butt cheek. Had a picture taken so that he could get copies made to send to his friends.
BTW, it's a pretty safe bet that everything visible from orbit has been photographed. Multiple times.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.