Utter lack of honesty
Nov 9, 2020 23:08:17 #
In the clip linked, we are treated with the argument that "in 2020 more white people v**ed for Trump than in 2016". While that may be true, so too did more Latino people and FAR more black males. The argument that the speaker tries to make is that such (white) turnout is a sign of r****m. What an utter lack of honesty.
That more w****s v**ed Trump (assuming the t***h of that) is proof more people v**ed for Trump policy. That, apparently, with more w****s, more latinos, and more b****s v****g Trump, he still is losing, proves a huge boost in turnout for all v**ers, specifically those who might v**e against Trump.
Absolute numbers is a liars argument. If 30% of v**ers v**e in an e******n and then 70% v**e the next time, citing absolute numbers, and then crying 'r****m' is an abject lie. It's an ongoing lie of convenience.
IF Trump got v**es from r****ts at a rate greater than Hillary got v**es from non-r****ts (unproven of course), the only real conclusion is that Hillary was not even alluring enough as a candidate to offset the v**es of r****ts. That Biden, apparently, is winning, is proof he WAS more alluring, and a v**e AGAINST the lie of systemically r****t America.
Why does media need to promulgate lies at a moment Biden is 'declared' the winner? Might it be a memo has already been circulated? Might it be the -16% Pennsylvania tally at 1 AM Eastern e******n night is actually the trend? Might it be that even in the shadow of media's denial of fraud the fraud-sters need cover? I'm starting to feel that the court challenges in PA, NV, GA, WI, MI, are about to uncover a lot more than 17 dead v**ers.....
OK.... terrible proofreading.... Not uncover dead v**ers. (Poltergeist was made in the 80's.)
I meant uncover the V**ES attributed to dead people, and a lot more fraud.
link https://youtu.be/R5ki6S-WsKU?t=787
That more w****s v**ed Trump (assuming the t***h of that) is proof more people v**ed for Trump policy. That, apparently, with more w****s, more latinos, and more b****s v****g Trump, he still is losing, proves a huge boost in turnout for all v**ers, specifically those who might v**e against Trump.
Absolute numbers is a liars argument. If 30% of v**ers v**e in an e******n and then 70% v**e the next time, citing absolute numbers, and then crying 'r****m' is an abject lie. It's an ongoing lie of convenience.
IF Trump got v**es from r****ts at a rate greater than Hillary got v**es from non-r****ts (unproven of course), the only real conclusion is that Hillary was not even alluring enough as a candidate to offset the v**es of r****ts. That Biden, apparently, is winning, is proof he WAS more alluring, and a v**e AGAINST the lie of systemically r****t America.
Why does media need to promulgate lies at a moment Biden is 'declared' the winner? Might it be a memo has already been circulated? Might it be the -16% Pennsylvania tally at 1 AM Eastern e******n night is actually the trend? Might it be that even in the shadow of media's denial of fraud the fraud-sters need cover? I'm starting to feel that the court challenges in PA, NV, GA, WI, MI, are about to uncover a lot more than 17 dead v**ers.....
OK.... terrible proofreading.... Not uncover dead v**ers. (Poltergeist was made in the 80's.)
I meant uncover the V**ES attributed to dead people, and a lot more fraud.
link https://youtu.be/R5ki6S-WsKU?t=787
Nov 9, 2020 23:39:26 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.