Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Orb weavers using expired film
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 28, 2020 11:30:50   #
Earnest Botello Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
Great series, Paul.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 12:01:28   #
Mark Sturtevant Loc: Grand Blanc, MI
 
Very cool! Somewhat guessing, but these look like marbled orb weavers, Araneus marmoreus.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 13:24:31   #
JeffDavidson Loc: Originally Detroit Now Los Angeles
 
Beautiful detail, patterns, color, etc.

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2020 17:55:01   #
srscary Loc: Cary, NC
 
I don't like spiders but these are "beauties"!

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 18:09:04   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Thank you merrytexan, Jerry, raymondh, Chuck, Bultaco, Jim, Audrey, Susan, Earnest, Mark, Jeff, Ronnie! I just bought a 'maybe the rest of a life-time' amount of expired film, adding to an existing personal hoard already taking up a lot of space in my freezer. The spiders will have to wait until the end of next summer, but film and film-subjects will be frequent topics for a while. Thank you all for your kind comments about these spiders.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 18:40:44   #
junglejim1949 Loc: Sacramento,CA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Thank you merrytexan, Jerry, raymondh, Chuck, Bultaco, Jim, Audrey, Susan, Earnest, Mark, Jeff, Ronnie! I just bought a 'maybe the rest of a life-time' amount of expired film, adding to an existing personal hoard already taking up a lot of space in my freezer. The spiders will have to wait until the end of next summer, but film and film-subjects will be frequent topics for a while. Thank you all for your kind comments about these spiders.


You have worked magic with expired film. Your quality and information remain outstanding.

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 21:55:34   #
Flying Three Loc: Berthoud, CO
 
Great spider shots!!

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2020 22:05:18   #
Gene Spearman Loc: Greenville, South Carolina.
 
Excellent shots!

Reply
Oct 28, 2020 22:59:08   #
RodeoMan Loc: St Joseph, Missouri
 
Thanks Paul, great shots and accompanying information. I am about to say something about Fuji and Kodak from my time of using both that probably has absolutely no basis in fact. It seemed to me if I were to make a landscape image of a scene, that Kodak would record more closely to what it actually were, but Fuji would record it closer to my memory of it. Somehow when I called the scene up in my memory, the skies would be a bit bluer and the grass greener than they were and Fuji would confirm this for me. Thanks I enjoy your posts both for the photographs and for the pithy comments.

Reply
Oct 29, 2020 00:06:32   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
RodeoMan wrote:
Thanks Paul, great shots and accompanying information. I am about to say something about Fuji and Kodak from my time of using both that probably has absolutely no basis in fact. It seemed to me if I were to make a landscape image of a scene, that Kodak would record more closely to what it actually were, but Fuji would record it closer to my memory of it. Somehow when I called the scene up in my memory, the skies would be a bit bluer and the grass greener than they were and Fuji would confirm this for me. Thanks I enjoy your posts both for the photographs and for the pithy comments.
Thanks Paul, great shots and accompanying informat... (show quote)


Thank you RodeoMan! By the time I get done with editing, it's hard to say what the film 'looked' like from the scan. The expired rolls, particularly the Fuji Superia, have been coming back with an initial red tint. I'm less concerned about how the films match to the world, but instead, how the colors look, especially the saturation and vibrance and how the scans adjust to my desired end result. Of everything I've shot so far, frame over frame and roll over roll, Kodak Ektar has been my favorite. The Fuji Superia versions also have a color saturation I prefer to the Fuji NPH and Portra films. Stay tuned for more example results.

Reply
Oct 29, 2020 00:06:37   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Thank you Jim, Flying Three, Gene, RodeoMan! As I plan for next year, I'll use ideas and analysis from this year. In addition to the extenders, I'd probably change the iso to ISO-160 for the expired NPH400 rolls, when used with a flash and these spiders and tunnel lights. Glad you enjoyed.

Reply
 
 
Oct 29, 2020 19:13:00   #
griffzky
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
(If you don't like spiders, you probably should close this post ... )

Lincoln Park is a 1,208-acre park situated along Lake Michigan on the North Side of Chicago, Illinois. Named after US President Abraham Lincoln, Lincoln Park is the city's largest public park. At several points along the entire 7-mile stretch of the park, pedestrians can access Lincoln Park via underground tunnels passing under the 6- to 10-lane LSD (Lake Shore Drive). In late summer the orb weavers reach their largest sizes having spent the summer gorging on insects drawn to the lights in the tunnels.

Chicago, IL
Sept 2020

Chicago Orb Weavers (Sept 2020) by Paul Sager, on Flickr


Fujicolor Pro is a line of professional color negative films from Japanese company Fujifilm introduced in 2004 for weddings, portraits, fashion and commercial photography. The main competitor for Fuji's Pro line is Kodak Portra.

Chicago Orb Weavers (Sept 2020)


Fuji NPH 400 was a daylight balanced film, sold from 2002-2004, and since renamed Pro 400H. The film used for these images expired in July 2003 and has been stored frozen and purchased via the UHH For-Sale section.

Chicago Orb Weavers (Sept 2020)


The camera was the EOS 1v, with the EF 180mm f/3.5L macro mounted to tripod with gimbal head. The Canon MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite Flash was attached to the front of the lens. The film was processed and scanned by North Coast Photography Services of Carlsbad, CA. The resulting JPEG were edited in Adobe Lightroom.

Chicago Orb Weavers (Sept 2020)


Renamed in 2004 to Pro 400H, with new packaging, no changes were made to the emulsion from Fuji Pro 400 NPH. I find the Kodak Portra 400 to have a much finer grain as compared to this Fuji film. Comments online consider the Fuji colors are generally 'cooler' than the equivalent Kodak Portra films.

Chicago Orb Weavers (Sept 2020)


I used my EOS DSLR to determine the flash and exposure settings based on the film's ISO-200 setting. But, I forgot my extension tubes that September evening and couldn't get much closer to better fill the frame and still be able to focus. From the digital files, I can crop-in for 'cleaner' results than much the same crop from the scanned film. I'm already thinking of different film types and settings for next summer's crop of spiders.

Chicago Orb Weavers (Sept 2020)


Try using <F11> to maximize your browser window for the full effect. If the images overshoot your display, such as a laptop, just click on the image or the URL link and they'll resize to your screen from the host Flickr site. You can click a bit further into the image details on the Flickr page, if desired. EXIF data is available from the host Flickr pages as well. On the Flickr site, use your <L>key for Large and the <F11> for the full-screen.
(If you don't like spiders, you probably should cl... (show quote)


Excellent work. I think spiders get a bad wrap, they help keep the insect population in check.

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 01:03:17   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
griffzky wrote:
Excellent work. I think spiders get a bad wrap, they help keep the insect population in check.


Thank you and I agree griffzky! These gals and guys look scary, but are really just teddy bears unless you're an insect.

Reply
Oct 30, 2020 07:49:46   #
Tito14 Loc: Central Florida
 
Susan yamakawa wrote:
❣️❣️🤗🤗👍👍


Fantastic Paul

Reply
Nov 16, 2020 23:43:13   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Tito14 wrote:
Fantastic Paul


Thank you Ernesto!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.