soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
Texcaster wrote:
No, it's Trump. He's presided over the debasement of public and private life in America.
Chance - "D'you wanna tell'em Stumpy?"
Stumpy - "Grandma never knew about pussy grabbin' ner golden showers before Mr Babylon pilgrim."
Really so I guess you call t*********r reading hour to little children ok.
G****r neutral bathrooms just fine
An 11 yr old d**g q***n dancing at a strip club ok too huh
https://youtu.be/hgq7MNasA9QAll promoted by the Dems
soba1 wrote:
Really so I guess you call t*********r reading hour to little children ok.
G****r neutral bathrooms just fine
An 11 yr old d**g q***n dancing at a strip club ok too huh
https://youtu.be/hgq7MNasA9QAll promoted by the Dems
??? Why link my post to your special interest tropes? Q***n much?
soba1
Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
Texcaster wrote:
??? Why link my post to your special interest tropes? Q***n much?
Watch the video. That’s the sick crap the Dems support. He is going to be one screwed up adult. That’s the party u support.
That’s another reason I would never be a Dem again
soba1 wrote:
Watch the video. That’s the sick crap the Dems support. He is going to be one screwed up adult. That’s the party u support.
That’s another reason I would never be a Dem again
You're always on about THAT vid. The way you spend your time is a worry. No one normal supports this fringe stuff. Why do you carry on like it's mainstream Libtard policy?
Try on Trump's 220,000 c***d dead ... that's about as mainstream as it gets pilgrim.
thom w wrote:
In what way did I insult him? You only find me insulting because I don't pretend you have your feet on the ground. You have become (based on your writings) a total Trump sycophant.
It was directed at your bad habit of using snide insults on nearly every member of the attic, I figure you batting at 500.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
robertjerl wrote:
I had a professor (an exchange from the University of Mumbai(Bombay) who taught History of the British Empire.
He stated that the British Empire and the US needed both the liberals and the conservatives.
He said the Liberals kept coming up with new ideas but seldom had the practical government sk**ls to finance and implement them or distinguish the good from the bad ideas.
The Conservatives were usually content to not change things that already worked but would carefully observe, decide which ideas were good and then had the sk**ls to implement them.
He also said that as long as the two sides just thought of the other as "different" things worked fine. It was when they started to see the other side as "the enemy" that the real problems started.
I had a professor (an exchange from the University... (
show quote)
That is what's happened here.
Circa 1964 the politics of personal destruction began to take over US politics.
The D party today would have no place for the likes of JFK, RFK, Scoop Jackson, HHH et al. LBJ poisoned the well on any type of peace.
The R party would have a hard time with Ike or Reagan today.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
truckster wrote:
That is your opinion and you are welcome to it. I believe for poor Republicans it is all about the h**e.
Spoken like a true h**er.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Kmgw9v wrote:
"If I had adopted the Democrat dogma, I would have lost my job, gone on disability, continued my alcoholism, been dependent on government programs, remained on the bottom rungs of the economic ladder, and blamed someone else on my condition."
What a pathetically stupid, asinine. thing to say.
Do you really believe that is the democratic dogma, or did you just get carried away in your ramblings.
It obviously is if you are a person of color.
The entire dogma of the D party is that people of color are incapable of caring for their own selves and need the white gubmint folks in the D party to protect them from those EEEVILLL capitalists.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
letmedance wrote:
We all have been more insulting than you can remember, ever think it be in response to your endless insults.
That is a ply of Tommy, Frankie and friends ... lie, insult and demean until they get a reaction and then cry about how they are victimized.
thom w wrote:
You have become more insulting than I remember. If you are happier not being here, you should leave, but I wouldn't want to be responsible for you leaving.
you are the king of snark, sir hypocrite!!!
Buckwheat said in part: "If I had adopted the Democrat dogma, I would have lost my job, gone on disability, continued my alcoholism, been dependent on government programs, remained on the bottom rungs of the economic ladder, and blamed someone else on my condition.
I believe the Republicans on the lower levels of the economy remain republicans because they still believe they can move up, or at least independent and not become attached to and dependent on the government teat."
You are disregarding your personal natural internal strength and attributing them to the Republican Party [classic not Trump style I hope!] Also you imply that you if helped for food or health care would have continued to drink, sat on your butt and grown fat living off the government doll. Nonsense, that is not your core which is one of personal strength and energy. If your father had been a take advantage of Democrat help programs you would still have had the drive to succeed in the long run.
Should we do away with programs that feed the people who do not have the where-with-all to be successful people. I taught 9th-grade special ed integrated into norm classroom after retiring from industrial management; during that 3 years I learned that some just do not have the brain power. Perhaps with better nutrition in-utero and beyond, their brains would have developed to be higher IQ. Those nutrition, school lunch, and early head-start programs would not have been Republican Programs would they?
My grandfather [dirt poor alcholic] was a republican because he enjoyed the Democratic WPA and Social Security as well as other New-deal Programs. He would talk about the big dollar republicans like they were drinking buddies. Associating himself with those very successful men by name linkage; in this way he avoided admitting his failures and weaknesses. To speak of the good FDR had done and helped him would be associating himself with the hand that helped him when he was down on his and the countries Herbert-Hover, "let them eat cake," ** neglective-luck.
**
"Let them eat cake" is the traditional t***slation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche",[1] spoken in the 17th or 18th century by "a great princess" upon learning that the peasants had no bread.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cake
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.