Retire the Football?
Oct 8, 2020 16:15:57 #
Trump’s C***D infection shows why it’s time to retire the nuclear football
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
By Tom Z. Collina, October 6, 2020
President John Kennedy took powerful pain medications. President Richard Nixon was a heavy drinker. President Ronald Reagan had dementia. And now President Donald Trump has the c****av***s. These conditions can significantly impair one’s ability to think clearly. And yet, as president, each had—or, in Trump’s case, still has–the unilateral authority to launch US nuclear weapons within minutes.
President Trump is followed 24/7 by a military aide that carries the “football,” the briefcase that holds all he would need to order the immediate launch of up to 1,000 nuclear weapons, more than enough megatonnage to blow the world back into the stone age. He does not need the approval of Congress or the secretary of defense. Shockingly, there are no checks and balances on this ultimate executive power.
President Trump took the nuclear football with him to Walter Reed Medical Center, where he received treatment for C****-**. According to Trump’s doctor, the president’s blood oxygen levels had dipped. And this, according to independent health experts, can impair decision-making ability. He is taking dexamethasone, which can cause mood swings and “frank psychotic manifestations.” Yet as far as we know, at no point did the president t***sfer his powers to the vice president, as allowed under the 25th Amendment.
To state the obvious, we should not entrust nuclear launch authority to someone who is not fully lucid. (Reagan t***sferred authority temporarily before planned surgery, as did President George W. Bush before a medical procedure that required his sedation.)
A nuclear crisis can happen at any time, including at the worst possible time. If such a crisis takes place when a president’s thinking is c*********d for any reason, the results could be catastrophic.
For example, imagine that the president is alerted to an incoming nuclear missile attack. He would have just minutes to decide what to do before the attack, if real, would land. Even in the best of circumstances there would be tremendous pressure to launch land-based ballistic missiles (which are highly vulnerable) immediately.
He would need all of his wits about him to understand that he should not launch these weapons. Why? Because any alert of a nuclear attack is likely to be a false alarm, and once launched our missiles cannot be recalled. If the president orders an attack in response to a false alarm, he would have started nuclear war by mistake.
If the president or his advisors have reason to believe that Trump’s thinking may be c*********d, nuclear launch authority should be t***sferred to the vice president, Mike Pence. If Pence also gets C***D, the football could then be passed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, President Pro Tempore of the Senate Chuck Grassley, and the secretaries of State, Treasury and Defense, in that order.
But kicking the football down the line does not solve the problem—and in fact shows why the system is broken. Does anyone really believe that the president pro tem of the Senate or the Treasury Secretary has spent much time preparing for nuclear war? And even if they had prepared, the central dilemma remains: All humans are imperfect, and we should not trust the fate of the world to any one person.
The whole concept of giving the president unilateral nuclear authority is built on the false assumption that Russia might launch a surprise first strike. In fact, Russia has never seriously considered a first strike against the United States for a simple reason: It would be national suicide. Both sides have to assume that an attack would provoke an unacceptable nuclear retaliation. Both nations, and much of the rest of the globe, would be obliterated. Starting such a war would be insanity.
Yet by facilitating a quick launch, we are making it more likely that the president will blunder into Armageddon. In a crisis, we should be seeking to give the president more decision time, not less. Maintaining an effective deterrent does not require us to rush into a nuclear war. We have hundreds of nuclear weapons deployed on submarines at sea that would survive any attack.
So rather than argue about who should have the football, let’s make the process safer and more democratic. The Constitution gives the power to declare war to Congress, not the president. Thus, a p**********l decision to initiate the use of nuclear weapons—the ultimate war declaration—would be unconstitutional. The next president can rectify this situation by declaring that he would share the authority to start nuclear war with Congress. He could also state that the sole purpose of US nuclear weapons is to deter their use by others.
Vice President Joe Biden has declared his support for such a “sole purpose” policy, which is essentially the same as a commitment to not use nuclear weapons first.
It is time to retire the nuclear football. The only thing standing between us and nuclear holocaust is one man with C***D on heavy meds. That is the plan? Ending sole authority is better than entrusting it to any individual. In a vibrant democracy, no one person should have the unchecked power to destroy the world.
Editor’s note: Ploughshares Fund provides financial support to the Bulletin.
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
By Tom Z. Collina, October 6, 2020
President John Kennedy took powerful pain medications. President Richard Nixon was a heavy drinker. President Ronald Reagan had dementia. And now President Donald Trump has the c****av***s. These conditions can significantly impair one’s ability to think clearly. And yet, as president, each had—or, in Trump’s case, still has–the unilateral authority to launch US nuclear weapons within minutes.
President Trump is followed 24/7 by a military aide that carries the “football,” the briefcase that holds all he would need to order the immediate launch of up to 1,000 nuclear weapons, more than enough megatonnage to blow the world back into the stone age. He does not need the approval of Congress or the secretary of defense. Shockingly, there are no checks and balances on this ultimate executive power.
President Trump took the nuclear football with him to Walter Reed Medical Center, where he received treatment for C****-**. According to Trump’s doctor, the president’s blood oxygen levels had dipped. And this, according to independent health experts, can impair decision-making ability. He is taking dexamethasone, which can cause mood swings and “frank psychotic manifestations.” Yet as far as we know, at no point did the president t***sfer his powers to the vice president, as allowed under the 25th Amendment.
To state the obvious, we should not entrust nuclear launch authority to someone who is not fully lucid. (Reagan t***sferred authority temporarily before planned surgery, as did President George W. Bush before a medical procedure that required his sedation.)
A nuclear crisis can happen at any time, including at the worst possible time. If such a crisis takes place when a president’s thinking is c*********d for any reason, the results could be catastrophic.
For example, imagine that the president is alerted to an incoming nuclear missile attack. He would have just minutes to decide what to do before the attack, if real, would land. Even in the best of circumstances there would be tremendous pressure to launch land-based ballistic missiles (which are highly vulnerable) immediately.
He would need all of his wits about him to understand that he should not launch these weapons. Why? Because any alert of a nuclear attack is likely to be a false alarm, and once launched our missiles cannot be recalled. If the president orders an attack in response to a false alarm, he would have started nuclear war by mistake.
If the president or his advisors have reason to believe that Trump’s thinking may be c*********d, nuclear launch authority should be t***sferred to the vice president, Mike Pence. If Pence also gets C***D, the football could then be passed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, President Pro Tempore of the Senate Chuck Grassley, and the secretaries of State, Treasury and Defense, in that order.
But kicking the football down the line does not solve the problem—and in fact shows why the system is broken. Does anyone really believe that the president pro tem of the Senate or the Treasury Secretary has spent much time preparing for nuclear war? And even if they had prepared, the central dilemma remains: All humans are imperfect, and we should not trust the fate of the world to any one person.
The whole concept of giving the president unilateral nuclear authority is built on the false assumption that Russia might launch a surprise first strike. In fact, Russia has never seriously considered a first strike against the United States for a simple reason: It would be national suicide. Both sides have to assume that an attack would provoke an unacceptable nuclear retaliation. Both nations, and much of the rest of the globe, would be obliterated. Starting such a war would be insanity.
Yet by facilitating a quick launch, we are making it more likely that the president will blunder into Armageddon. In a crisis, we should be seeking to give the president more decision time, not less. Maintaining an effective deterrent does not require us to rush into a nuclear war. We have hundreds of nuclear weapons deployed on submarines at sea that would survive any attack.
So rather than argue about who should have the football, let’s make the process safer and more democratic. The Constitution gives the power to declare war to Congress, not the president. Thus, a p**********l decision to initiate the use of nuclear weapons—the ultimate war declaration—would be unconstitutional. The next president can rectify this situation by declaring that he would share the authority to start nuclear war with Congress. He could also state that the sole purpose of US nuclear weapons is to deter their use by others.
Vice President Joe Biden has declared his support for such a “sole purpose” policy, which is essentially the same as a commitment to not use nuclear weapons first.
It is time to retire the nuclear football. The only thing standing between us and nuclear holocaust is one man with C***D on heavy meds. That is the plan? Ending sole authority is better than entrusting it to any individual. In a vibrant democracy, no one person should have the unchecked power to destroy the world.
Editor’s note: Ploughshares Fund provides financial support to the Bulletin.
Oct 8, 2020 17:33:20 #
John_F wrote:
Trump’s C***D infection shows why it’s time to ret... (show quote)
I have to say that article is pretty ignorant. There are a lot of high level people who have input into the decision - people far more astute than Congress. And certainly more astute than the author of this article.
Oct 8, 2020 17:42:45 #
Rose42 wrote:
I have to say that article is pretty ignorant. There are a lot of high level people who have input into the decision - people far more astute than Congress. And certainly more astute than the author of this article.
Yes but
1. There is only one person that has final say.
2. In this case it is a person that listens to no one.
Oct 9, 2020 11:40:39 #
The Bulletin does not publish ignorance. Its originators were physicists aand chemists of the atomic bomb project of WWII. And its earned reputation has continued to the present. It is Rose42 who is ignorant. If you can, show the demonstrated evidence for your claims of unt***hs.
Rose42 wrote:
I have to say that article is pretty ignorant. There are a lot of high level people who have input into the decision - people far more astute than Congress. And certainly more astute than the author of this article.
Oct 9, 2020 12:51:34 #
Rose42 wrote:
I have to say that article is pretty ignorant. There are a lot of high level people who have input into the decision - people far more astute than Congress. And certainly more astute than the author of this article.
Stop defending the incompetent man in the White House
Oct 9, 2020 16:23:58 #
John_F wrote:
The Bulletin does not publish ignorance. Its originators were physicists aand chemists of the atomic bomb project of WWII. And its earned reputation has continued to the present. It is Rose42 who is ignorant. If you can, show the demonstrated evidence for your claims of unt***hs.
Oh but it did portray ignorance. Do you really think those who are in on the decision are ignorant of what would happen? They know FAR more about war than these scientists ever will. The makers of our fighter jets, bombers and other military equipment aren't experts in their tactical (or strategic) use either. I could give many more examples to illustrate the point but you should get the idea.
Did you know they have regular drills involving what to do should a missile be launched by another country? Do you think people involved would be stupid enough to let a president be trigger happy?
Oct 9, 2020 16:27:50 #
RixPix wrote:
Stop defending the incompetent man in the White House
What I said has nothing to do with Trump and is no defense. Its sad the way you've let him warp your thinking so you're not thinking.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.