New England Journal of Medicine
Oct 7, 2020 17:29:08 #
In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the C****-** p******c -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be v**ed out of office.
Oct 7, 2020 17:47:39 #
DukeTarHeel wrote:
In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the C****-** p******c -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be v**ed out of office.
They certainly are entitled to any political opinion. But it doesn't belong in a vvery prestigious medical journal. They should stick to medicine.
Oct 7, 2020 17:51:41 #
DukeTarHeel wrote:
In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the C****-** p******c -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be v**ed out of office.
No surprise. Only Trump's immovable cult defend his performance during this P******c.
Oct 7, 2020 18:35:24 #
DukeTarHeel wrote:
In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the C****-** p******c -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be v**ed out of office.
I would love to know where they get their funding
Oct 7, 2020 18:36:58 #
soba1 wrote:
I would love to know where they get their funding
If you are serious, do some research. The information is available.
Oct 7, 2020 18:42:07 #
Oct 7, 2020 18:45:21 #
boberic wrote:
They certainly are entitled to any political opinion. But it doesn't belong in a vvery prestigious medical journal. They should stick to medicine.
They've been sticking to medicine for 208 years, so that tells you how seriously they feel the situation is. It seems to me to be less a political opinion than a public health one.
Oct 7, 2020 18:47:42 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
If you are serious, do some research. The information is available.
I tried couldn’t find anything.
Besides I had a long day, is not that serious.
Oct 7, 2020 19:16:33 #
soba1 wrote:
I would love to know where they get their funding
Private funding, medical personnel subscriptions. What, if they were funded with public funds, you would have their budget cut? A swing and a miss.
Oct 7, 2020 19:21:30 #
smf85
Loc: Freeport, IL
boberic wrote:
They certainly are entitled to any political opinion. But it doesn't belong in a vvery prestigious medical journal. They should stick to medicine.
They are.
Oct 7, 2020 19:23:05 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
They've been sticking to medicine for 208 years, so that tells you how seriously they feel the situation is. It seems to me to be less a political opinion than a public health one.
You can try to dismiss it like that but it really is a medical issue. A continuation of his administration will cause further damage because his inept handling of the p******c..
This is a first for the the New England Journal of Medicine has been continuously published for over 200 years. Doesn't that tell you trump is a danger to the American healthcare system.
Oct 7, 2020 19:34:28 #
DukeTarHeel wrote:
You can try to dismiss it like that but it really is a medical issue. A continuation of his administration will cause further damage because his inept handling of the p******c..
This is a first for the the New England Journal of Medicine has been continuously published for over 200 years. Doesn't that tell you trump is a danger to the American healthcare system.
This is a first for the the New England Journal of Medicine has been continuously published for over 200 years. Doesn't that tell you trump is a danger to the American healthcare system.
I'm not dismissing anything. I was replying to someone who said a medical journal shouldn't have political opinions, and I'm glad they did. I think you have misunderstood me, as I have felt all along that Trump has totally failed at leadership on the p******c.
Oct 7, 2020 19:44:29 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
I'm not dismissing anything. I was replying to someone who said a medical journal shouldn't have political opinions, and I'm glad they did. I think you have misunderstood me, as I have felt all along that Trump has totally failed at leadership on the p******c.
My apologies John, it is clear that I did misunderstand. Thanks for clarifying it for me. I've looked back, my response should have been to Bobdrick and he was pretty reasonable but I thought he was missing the huge significance of it.
Oct 7, 2020 21:28:10 #
DukeTarHeel wrote:
Private funding, medical personnel subscriptions. What, if they were funded with public funds, you would have their budget cut? A swing and a miss.
Nooooo actually purse strings influence opinions.
Oct 7, 2020 21:53:46 #
If you would be so kind could u find out who the biggest donor is. If not understood
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.