Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Suggestions please
Sep 25, 2020 13:32:17   #
iamimdoc
 
Competent amateur photographer

For years I have used Nikon D200 with Nikon 18-200 VR lens. Converted D200 to IR and added a Nikon D300

Not unhappy with above eqpt EXCEPT for the weight.

One lens makes life much easier IMO

I got an Sony Alpha 6400 with kit 16-50 mm lens. Goal was lighter gear, newer camera features, etc.

But would like longer reach, ideally with single lens.

Suggestions appreciated for ~18-200 (or longer) Sony Emount that would give same/better than Nikon equivalent.

Thanks in advance

Reply
Sep 26, 2020 08:41:34   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
iamimdoc wrote:
Competent amateur photographer

For years I have used Nikon D200 with Nikon 18-200 VR lens. Converted D200 to IR and added a Nikon D300

Not unhappy with above eqpt EXCEPT for the weight.

One lens makes life much easier IMO

I got an Sony Alpha 6400 with kit 16-50 mm lens. Goal was lighter gear, newer camera features, etc.

But would like longer reach, ideally with single lens.

Suggestions appreciated for ~18-200 (or longer) Sony Emount that would give same/better than Nikon equivalent.

Thanks in advance
Competent amateur photographer br br For years I ... (show quote)


The Sony 100-400 is great, it is a Red G master lens (has two focusing motors). I personally use the longer reaching Sony 200-600 Black G master lens(has one focusing motor). I have not noticed a difference in focusing speeds between the two lenses. The 100-400 is lighter but not by that much. For the 200-600 I use a mono pod and the Wimberley MH-100 head, makes life so much easier.
Sony Emountt lenses are no sharper than Nikon lenses.
Their is the Sony SEL18200LE 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 lens, but it is no longer than the Nikon.
SONY FE 24-240MM F/3.5-6.3 OSS LENS
Sony E 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 G OSS Lens

Reply
Sep 26, 2020 09:22:49   #
User ID
 
Keeping weight down I use an 18-105 cuz the 18-135 was introduced after I got my lens. The Sony has clear image zoom which your Nikons did not. A 1.5X setting on the ciz will get you 200mm from the 18-135 and still maintain the full 24MP.

An 18-200 is an 11X zoom, always involving some compromises. Ciz at 1.5X is pixel interpolation also involves a similar degree of compromise. Pick your poison, as they(?) say. I’ve never met “they”, but they do seem to have been around the block a few times ...

You could get the 18-200 and know that ciz can also boost that lens to 300mm or more when you need it.

Reply
 
 
Sep 26, 2020 13:47:52   #
Desert Gecko Loc: desert southwest, USA
 
iamimdoc wrote:
Competent amateur photographer

For years I have used Nikon D200 with Nikon 18-200 VR lens. Converted D200 to IR and added a Nikon D300

Not unhappy with above eqpt EXCEPT for the weight.

One lens makes life much easier IMO

I got an Sony Alpha 6400 with kit 16-50 mm lens. Goal was lighter gear, newer camera features, etc.

But would like longer reach, ideally with single lens.

Suggestions appreciated for ~18-200 (or longer) Sony Emount that would give same/better than Nikon equivalent.

Thanks in advance
Competent amateur photographer br br For years I ... (show quote)

Sony's 70-300mm e-mount G lens is excellent. You can read reviews anywhere online, and one comment that frequently shows up is one I'll echo: This lens is underrated.

I'm getting ready to sell my three cameras and several lenses, including my Sony 70-300 I bought less than two years ago. PM me if interested, or wait until later today or tomorrow and I should have my gear listed here.

Reply
Sep 26, 2020 15:42:56   #
Frank Basile Loc: Hudson Valley NY
 
I am using a Tamron 28-200 f2.8-5.6 on my Sony a6000 with good results

Reply
Sep 26, 2020 17:08:08   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
iamimdoc wrote:
Competent amateur photographer

For years I have used Nikon D200 with Nikon 18-200 VR lens. Converted D200 to IR and added a Nikon D300

Not unhappy with above eqpt EXCEPT for the weight.

One lens makes life much easier IMO

I got an Sony Alpha 6400 with kit 16-50 mm lens. Goal was lighter gear, newer camera features, etc.

But would like longer reach, ideally with single lens.

Suggestions appreciated for ~18-200 (or longer) Sony Emount that would give same/better than Nikon equivalent.

Thanks in advance
Competent amateur photographer br br For years I ... (show quote)

I use FF Tamron lenses with my a6600. They have a 17-28, 28-75, 70-180 all f2.8, which will, of course, give apparent reach. BTW, the 55-210 kit lens is very lightweight and a good lens.

Reply
Sep 26, 2020 23:30:28   #
worldcycle Loc: Stateline, Nevada
 
Unless you completely transform to cell phone photography you are always going to be hauling gear. Sure get a 12-1200mm zoom. Still weigh a ton. Convert to mirrorless. Now your wallet has lost weight yet you are still hauling gear. Get a nice kit with a nice bag to haul it in. I have many bodies and lenses. Yet unless I am looking for something specific to shoot, I am always carrying my 5DMIV with a L 24-105 attached and an L 16-35 and an L 70-300 in the bag. NEVER without them. You can get an acceptable "everything" lens or carry a few optically better lens and be much happier when that crucial image presents itself.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2020 06:39:51   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
worldcycle wrote:
Unless you completely transform to cell phone photography you are always going to be hauling gear. Sure get a 12-1200mm zoom. Still weigh a ton. Convert to mirrorless. Now your wallet has lost weight yet you are still hauling gear. Get a nice kit with a nice bag to haul it in. I have many bodies and lenses. Yet unless I am looking for something specific to shoot, I am always carrying my 5DMIV with a L 24-105 attached and an L 16-35 and an L 70-300 in the bag. NEVER without them. You can get an acceptable "everything" lens or carry a few optically better lens and be much happier when that crucial image presents itself.
Unless you completely transform to cell phone phot... (show quote)


Be aware that long mirrorless lenses are really no lighter than DSLR lenses. Plus your holding a much smaller camera with that long lens attached. I can be a bit front heavy, my suggestion has always been to add the vertical grip to the camera to help gripping it better.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.