Anybody besides me
Anybody besides me that think it’s hilarious the Democrats are crying, whaling and belly aching about Trump getting to nominating someone to the Supreme Court and suggesting it should be left to whoever wins the upcoming e******n. I’m sure if Hillary had (thank goodness she isn’t) been POTUS right now they would still be insisting that the nomination be left to the winner of the 2020 e******n: right? And, if you believe that surely you don’t have all your oars in the water.
Huey Driver wrote:
Anybody besides me
Anybody besides me that think it’s hilarious the Democrats are crying, whaling and belly aching about Trump getting to nominating someone to the Supreme Court and suggesting it should be left to whoever wins the upcoming e******n. I’m sure if Hillary had (thank goodness she isn’t) been POTUS right now they would still be insisting that the nomination be left to the winner of the 2020 e******n: right? And, if you believe that surely you don’t have all your oars in the water.
Anybody besides me br br Anybody besides me that ... (
show quote)
And where would you stand if everything was reversed?
I believe it is the law who is eligible to nominate a supreme court judge and if I'm right I would follow the law even though I might not like it. Democrats seem to have a problem with any law that doesn't fit their agenda.
Huey Driver wrote:
I believe it is the law who is eligible to nominate a supreme court judge and if I'm right I would follow the law even though I might not like it. Democrats seem to have a problem with any law that doesn't fit their agenda.
And I am sure there are just as many Democrats
who can say the exact same thing about the republicans.
Note I said I believe. What do you think it's just whom ever hollers the loudest get's to pick?
Huey Driver wrote:
I believe it is the law who is eligible to nominate a supreme court judge and if I'm right I would follow the law even though I might not like it. Democrats seem to have a problem with any law that doesn't fit their agenda.
Did Mitch follow the law with Merrick Garland in 2016?
Kmgw9v wrote:
Did Mitch follow the law with Merrick Garland in 2916?
I don't know. If that's a year your asking about I seriously doubt any of us will be around then? So exactly who do you think has the obligation and authority to nominate a SC Judge?
Huey Driver wrote:
I don't know. If that's a year your asking about I seriously doubt any of us will be around then? So exactly who do you think has the obligation and authority to nominate a SC Judge?
I corrected the typo. Now can you be an adult?
Kmgw9v wrote:
I corrected the typo. Now can you be an adult?
You obviously like to ask questions but maybe don't like answering them. I told you I didn't know the answer to your question. You never said who you think has the obligation and authority to nominate a SC judge?
Huey Driver wrote:
You obviously like to ask questions but maybe don't like answering them. I told you I didn't know the answer to your question. You never said who you think has the obligation and authority to nominate a SC judge?
I asked if Mitch followed the rules in 2016 when he steadfastly, illegally refused to hold confirmation hearings for Merrick Garland stating that the v**ers had the right to decide and the e******n was only 8 months away.
The President as in Trump, and/or Obama.
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
Huey Driver wrote:
Anybody besides me
Anybody besides me that think it’s hilarious the Democrats are crying, whaling and belly aching about Trump getting to nominating someone to the Supreme Court and suggesting it should be left to whoever wins the upcoming e******n. I’m sure if Hillary had (thank goodness she isn’t) been POTUS right now they would still be insisting that the nomination be left to the winner of the 2020 e******n: right? And, if you believe that surely you don’t have all your oars in the water.
Anybody besides me br br Anybody besides me that ... (
show quote)
I guess you felt the same way in 2016 when McConnell took exactly the same position the democrats are taking today.
As I stated above, you ask questions but don't answer them like the one posted above. Maybe you can't read as well as I stated I didn't know the answer to your question.
Huey Driver wrote:
As I stated above, you ask questions but don't answer them like the one posted above. Maybe you can't read as well as I stated I didn't know the answer to your question.
You know the answer but you don't want to admit it.
Kraken wrote:
You know the answer but you don't want to admit it.
Since you claim to know all, why don't YOU tell us the answer,
Amazing Ordinary Kreskin...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.