C***d whistleblower
Sep 16, 2020 07:17:33 #
Watch "C****av***s whistleblower speaks out about possible C***D origin on 'Tucker'" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/qFlqXPl_hZQ
https://youtu.be/qFlqXPl_hZQ
Sep 16, 2020 07:19:50 #
I'm not sure how she was in the position to know that China did it deliberately. She didn't seem to clarify that to me. That's an awful big accusation to make that would require quite a bit of evidence. I can't believe China would do that to its own people.
Sep 16, 2020 07:27:43 #
Sep 16, 2020 07:35:50 #
Sep 16, 2020 08:14:59 #
srscary
Loc: Cary, NC
Sirsnapalot wrote:
Watch "C****av***s whistleblower speaks out about possible C***D origin on 'Tucker'" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/qFlqXPl_hZQ
https://youtu.be/qFlqXPl_hZQ
https://www.yahoo.com/news/steve-bannon-linked-groups-push-191602344.html
Sep 16, 2020 08:25:52 #
Sep 16, 2020 08:29:34 #
Sep 16, 2020 08:30:16 #
sueyeisert
Loc: New Jersey
Triple G wrote:
That is Bannon’s theory. He’ll be in jail soon and out of circulation.
The sooner the better
Sep 16, 2020 08:43:44 #
Xanadu
Loc: Clay County FL
I would not label a person I disagreed with as an i***t. Nonetheless, I find it unimaginable that any thoughtful person or country would deliberately unleash a deadly disease on the world.
Sep 16, 2020 08:46:20 #
srscary wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/steve-bannon-linked-groups-push-191602344.html
Tucker did say that he was giving her the benefit of doubt, assuming she was not a anti Chinese r****t.......you can only take it at face value ......until her viability is truly known.....
Sep 16, 2020 08:57:06 #
sueyeisert wrote:
Even his lawyers used “you should know better than believe tucker” as his defense.
https://www.courthousenews.com/fighting-slander-suit-over-tucker-carlson-fox-calls-host-hyperbolic/
https://www.newsbreak.com/new-york/new-york/news/1585835720382/fox-news-lawyer-tells-a-federal-judge-they-know-tucker-carlson-is-full-of-
Sep 16, 2020 09:11:46 #
I have to deal with this kind of digestive discharge on FaceBook! It is not what I joined UHH for. Rather, I had hopes of learning something useful, fascinating and inspiring about my chosen hobby (which was once a part time profession). I have learned a lot from very knowledgeable and creative people, thank you. I really appreciate it.
Sep 16, 2020 09:17:03 #
Sirsnapalot wrote:
Watch "C****av***s whistleblower speaks out about possible C***D origin on 'Tucker'" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/qFlqXPl_hZQ
https://youtu.be/qFlqXPl_hZQ
I think I'll pass on ATTIC dust.
Sep 16, 2020 11:09:45 #
Sirsnapalot wrote:
Tucker did say that he was giving her the benefit of doubt, assuming she was not a anti Chinese r****t.......you can only take it at face value ......until her viability is truly known.....
That's the problem, though. There is no verification for her story. There was a time that it wouldn't get published. Today, everybody with a hair up his patootie that might appeal to some demographic can get published. That's why we have so much f**e news. It's why Vindman was able to generate an impeachment, despite the fact that many other people were listening to the same thing he did and found no fault with it.
Sep 16, 2020 13:05:09 #
I saw the interview. Tucker did not take a position. He clearly states that he was presenting this story only because it seemed somewhat credible. Don't attack the messenger. Attack the Dr. if you need to.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.