Based on faulty intelligence by the Bush administration. Democrats supported the President, unlike the current crop of Republican misfits.

A recent example took place last week. The administration put forth a jobs bill to train returning vets for available jobs and the Republicans shot it down. Well...so much for supporting our troops.

There has never been a more important presidential race than this one. I highly suggest that all you Obama-ites read the following and cast your vote very, very carefully.

From: John Porter
To: Americans everywhere
I was sitting at my keyboard halfway through my writing a letter to you about how Barack Obama was fulfilling his pledge to "Transform America" by "Changing the fundamentals of America ," so that our government would become the plantation, he the owner, and we the slaves, when this article by Steve McCann appeared in my in box. After checking it for accuracy, and finding it to be so, I put my writing on hold and here present it to you, for I could not say it better.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Obama's Second Term Transformation Plans

The 2012 election has often been described as the most pivotal since 1860.This statement is not hyperbole. If Barack Obama is re-elected the United States will never be the same, nor will it be able to re-capture its once lofty status as the most dominant nation in the history of mankind.
The overwhelming majority of Americans do not understand that Obama's first term was dedicated to putting in place executive power to enable him and the administration to fulfill the campaign promise of "transforming America " in his second term regardless of which political party controls Congress. That is why his re-election team is virtually ignoring the plight of incumbent or prospective Democratic Party office holders.
The most significant accomplishment of Obama's first term was to make Congress irrelevant. Under the myopic and blindly loyal leadership of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats have succeeded in creating an imperial and, in a second term, a potential dictatorial presidency.
During the first two years of the Obama administration when the Democrats overwhelming controlled both Houses of Congress and the media was in an Obama worshipping stupor, a myriad of laws were passed and actions taken which transferred virtually unlimited power to the executive branch.
The birth of multi-thousand page laws was not an aberration. This tactic was adopted so the bureaucracy controlled by Obama appointees would have sole discretion in interpreting vaguely written laws and enforcing thousands of pages of regulations they and not Congress would subsequently write.
For example, in the 2,700 pages of ObamaCare there are more than 2,500 references to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There are more than 700 instances when he or she is instructed that they "shall" do something and more than 200 times when they "may" take at their sole discretion some form of regulatory action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that the "Secretary determines." In essence one person, appointed by and reporting to the president, will be in charge of the health care of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully operational in 2014.
The same is true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act which confers nearly unlimited power on various agencies to control by fiat the nation's financial, banking and investment sectors. The bill also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any oversight by Congress. This overall process was repeated numerous times with other legislation all with the intent of granting unfettered power to the executive branch controlled by Barack Obama and his radical associates.
Additionally, the Obama administration has, through its unilaterally determined rule making and regulatory powers, created laws out of whole cloth. The Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily basis issues new regulations clearly out of their purview in order to modify and change environmental laws previously passed and to impose a radical green agenda never approved by Congress. The same is true of the Energy and Interior Departments among many others.
None of these extra-constitutional actions have been challenged by Congress. The left in America knows this usurpation of power is nearly impossible to reverse unless stopped in its early stages.
It is clearly the mindset of this administration and its appointees that Congress is merely a nuisance and can be ignored after they were able to take full advantage of the useful idiots in the Democrat controlled House and Senate in 2009-2010 and the Democrat Senate in the current Congress.
Additionally, Barack Obama knows after his re-election a Republican controlled House and Senate will not be able to enact any legislation to roll back the power previously granted to the Executive Branch or usurped by them. His veto will not be overridden as there will always be at least 145 Democratic members of the House or 34 in the Senate in agreement with or intimidated by an administration more than willing to use Chicago style political tactics.
The stalemate between the Executive and Legislative Branches will inure to the benefit of Barack Obama and his fellow leftists.
The most significant power Congress has is the control of the purse-strings as all spending must be approved by them However,once re-elected, Barack Obama, as confirmed by his willingness to do or say anything and his unscrupulous re-election tactics,would not only threaten government shutdowns but would deliberately withhold payments to those dependent on government support as a means of intimidating and forcing a Republican controlled Congress to surrender to his demands, thus neutering their ability to control the administration through spending constraints.
Further, this administration has shown contempt for the courts by ignoring various court orders, e.g. the Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium, as well as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by Congress. The Eric Holder Justice Department has become the epitome of corruption as part of the most dishonest and deceitful administration in American history. In a second term the arrogance of Barack Obama and his minions will become more blatant as he will not have to be concerned with re-election.
Who will be there to enforce the rule of law, a Supreme Court ruling or the Constitution? No one. Barack Obama and his fellow-travelers will be unchallenged as they run roughshod over the American people.
Many Republicans and conservatives dissatisfied with the prospect of Mitt Romney as the nominee for president are instead focused on re-taking the House and Senate. That goal, while worthy and necessary, is meaningless unless Barack Obama is defeated . The nation is not dealing with a person of character and integrity but someone of single-minded purpose and overwhelming narcissism. Judging by his actions, words and deeds during his first term, he does not intend to work with Congress,either Republican or Democrat in his second term but rather to force his radical agenda on the American people through the power he has usurped or been granted.
The governmental structure of the United States was set up by the founders in the hope that over the years only those people of high moral character and integrity would assume the reins of power. However, knowing that was not always possible, they dispersed power over three distinct and independent branches as a check on each other.
What they could not imagine is the surrender and abdication of its constitutional duty by the preeminent governmental branch, the Congress, to a chief executive devoid of any character or integrity coupled with a judiciary essentially powerless to enforce the law when the chief executive ignores them.
Conservatives, Libertarians, the Republican Party and Mitt Romney must come to grips with this moment in time and their historical role in denying Barack Obama and his minions their ultimate goal. All resources must be directed at that end-game and not merely controlling Congress and the various committee chairmanships.
Steve McCann
May 12, 2012

Instead of reading this stuff above, which was "slightly " biased
and betting you won't check " the facts "

HealthCare.gov

Man up or Woman up and check for yourself . After all, it is your life. It is set up so you can easily go to what's important to you first , and then check the " FACTS " that were brought to you by these totally unbiased gentlemen.

I would not necessarily call HealthCare.gov to be an unbiased source, that information is prepared and filtered through a communications group who are very careful in how information is disseminated to the public... It is interesting my brother's son-in-law was a spokes person for Health and Human services under the Obama administration and a couple of Thanksgivings back during the Haiti earthquake he was reading and what I could only characterize as censuring communications and releases from the CDC regarding the Colora and conditions in Haiti at the time, so even our scientific community communicating with another government is censured and their communications are made to fit a more politically acceptable agenda... I know that my niece's husband is no scientist, but he does have a background in PR and that was what was most important to the administration and that is why he was reading CDC communications before they were released.

It is really hard for me to take anything coming out of this administration at face value, they have changed our State Department fact sheets on foreign countries to reflect the Obama administrations policies, they have done the same with the presidential biographies, they have added paragraphs to presidents starting with Calvin Coolidge comparing their accomplishments with those of modern day Obama...

It is sad to say but our government is not necessarily a good source for information in this day in age.

That is the law for you to read, in all it's glory , and for you to see what's written .

Here, try this Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would not necessarily call HealthCare.gov to be an unbiased source, that information is prepared and filtered through a communications group who are very careful in how information is disseminated to the public... It is interesting my brother's son-in-law was a spokes person for Health and Human services under the Obama administration and a couple of Thanksgivings back during the Haiti earthquake he was reading and what I could only characterize as censuring communications and releases from the CDC regarding the Colora and conditions in Haiti at the time, so even our scientific community communicating with another government is censured and their communications are made to fit a more politically acceptable agenda... I know that my niece's husband is no scientist, but he does have a background in PR and that was what was most important to the administration and that is why he was reading CDC communications before they were released.

It is really hard for me to take anything coming out of this administration at face value, they have changed our State Department fact sheets on foreign countries to reflect the Obama administrations policies, they have done the same with the presidential biographies, they have added paragraphs to presidents starting with Calvin Coolidge comparing their accomplishments with those of modern day Obama...

It is sad to say but our government is not necessarily a good source for information in this day in age.

That is the law for you to read, in all it's glory , and for you to see what's written .

Here, try this Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tell me why Union's Health care plans were given a waiver by the Obama administration? Sounds like Good Old Boy politics to me...

Tell me why Union's Health care plans were given a waiver by the Obama administration? Sounds like Good Old Boy politics to me...

They haven't been favored. Your just anti-union. Your parents probably benefitted from a union pension but they didn't will you their benefits and now you are disgruntled.

Boy are you a crock full of shit...Neither parent was a Union member & I got nothing in any Will either. I was a Union member for 8 years & the Union didn't do shit for me except take my money...See. I can stoop to your level when I want too. Grow a life !