Ever since Jacob Blake was shot in Kenosha by police officers, l*****ts have been praising him as something of a martyr.
They seem to be ignoring the fact that Blake had an outstanding warrant on him and was being confronted by officers, while trying to steal a car.
It seems the man had a history of wrongdoing and should hardly be praised.
But Democratic candidate for vice president, Kamala Harris, apparently told Blake himself how proud she was of him.
If that doesn’t sound right to you, it didn’t to Megyn Kelly either:
PROUD of him? He’s accused of breaking into a sleeping woman’s house, sexually assaulting her, humiliating her & later returning to harass her. Then the cops she called for help say he resisted arrest, assaulted them & went for his knife. How about a word for his victim, Senator?
After Sen. Harris praised Jacob Blake, saying she was proud of him, Megyn Kelly called her out.
She brought up the inconvenient facts about the Blake case. That he is accused of breaking into a woman’s house and assaulting her.
After she called the cops, he resisted arrest and went for a deadly weapon.
By no means does it appear that Jacob Blake is a victim of “r****t” cops or “police brutality.”
Instead, he is a man who allegedly broke the law and incited the consequences.
Kelly also brings up the fact that Harris, someone who claims to be a champion of women’s rights, is neglecting this victim.
It seems the woman who wants to be vice president considers Blake to be a role model or hero.
Black L***s M****r and the media seem fine with promoting an inaccurate portrait of Blake, in order to push their narrative.
But why would a woman seeking high office do the same? Recently, Joe Biden scrambled to condemn the violence that has rocked so many American cities.
After all that, his running mate praises a man who should face trial for his long list of charges.
Seems like the Democratic Party has their priorities all mixed up.
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
scooter1 wrote:
Ever since Jacob Blake was shot in Kenosha by police officers, l*****ts have been praising him as something of a martyr.
They seem to be ignoring the fact that Blake had an outstanding warrant on him and was being confronted by officers, while trying to steal a car.
It seems the man had a history of wrongdoing and should hardly be praised.
But Democratic candidate for vice president, Kamala Harris, apparently told Blake himself how proud she was of him.
If that doesn’t sound right to you, it didn’t to Megyn Kelly either:
PROUD of him? He’s accused of breaking into a sleeping woman’s house, sexually assaulting her, humiliating her & later returning to harass her. Then the cops she called for help say he resisted arrest, assaulted them & went for his knife. How about a word for his victim, Senator?
After Sen. Harris praised Jacob Blake, saying she was proud of him, Megyn Kelly called her out.
She brought up the inconvenient facts about the Blake case. That he is accused of breaking into a woman’s house and assaulting her.
After she called the cops, he resisted arrest and went for a deadly weapon.
By no means does it appear that Jacob Blake is a victim of “r****t” cops or “police brutality.”
Instead, he is a man who allegedly broke the law and incited the consequences.
Kelly also brings up the fact that Harris, someone who claims to be a champion of women’s rights, is neglecting this victim.
It seems the woman who wants to be vice president considers Blake to be a role model or hero.
Black L***s M****r and the media seem fine with promoting an inaccurate portrait of Blake, in order to push their narrative.
But why would a woman seeking high office do the same? Recently, Joe Biden scrambled to condemn the violence that has rocked so many American cities.
After all that, his running mate praises a man who should face trial for his long list of charges.
Seems like the Democratic Party has their priorities all mixed up.
Ever since Jacob Blake was shot in Kenosha by poli... (
show quote)
You think this was the shootout at the OK corral? Wyatt Earp vs. the bad guus in black hats?
He was unarmed and shot in the back. Hard to see that at the time the shots were fired he was a threat to anyone.
But as Trump says...like missing a golf putt, right?
Bazbo wrote:
You think this was the shootout at the OK corral? Wyatt Earp vs. the bad guus in black hats?
He was unarmed and shot in the back. Hard to see that at the time the shots were fired he was a threat to anyone.
But as Trump says...like missing a golf putt, right?
You got the CNN version of what happened.
As was once famously said. "the rest of the story" by Paul Harvey.
Bazbo wrote:
You think this was the shootout at the OK corral? Wyatt Earp vs. the bad guus in black hats?
He was unarmed and shot in the back. Hard to see that at the time the shots were fired he was a threat to anyone.
But as Trump says...like missing a golf putt, right?
What call would you have made? He refused commands, which by the way is ignorant, and was going for a knife. You make the call and you might be dead, leaving a traumatized and heartbroken family. You 'arm chair quarterbacks' seem to have all the answers sitting behind your keyboard.
Architect1776 wrote:
You got the CNN version of what happened.
As was once famously said. "the rest of the story" by Paul Harvey.
Harvey had a fabulous radio voice. He was a right wing christian crazy, but the voice had market value. He may have been nuts, but I still doubt he would have appreciated you.
scooter1 wrote:
What call would you have made? He refused commands, which by the way is ignorant, and was going for a knife. You make the call and you might be dead, leaving a traumatized and heartbroken family. You 'arm chair quarterbacks' seem to have all the answers sitting behind your keyboard.
What knife? Where is the evidence of the knife? Having warrants is not normally a capital offense. Offending a cop is not supposed to be a capital offense. On more than one occasion I have said to a cop that just because he isn't getting any at home, doesn't give him the right to F**k me. I wasn't shot, but then again, I wasn't black.
scooter1 wrote:
Ever since Jacob Blake was shot in Kenosha by police officers, l*****ts have been praising him as something of a martyr.
They seem to be ignoring the fact that Blake had an outstanding warrant on him and was being confronted by officers, while trying to steal a car.
It seems the man had a history of wrongdoing and should hardly be praised.
But Democratic candidate for vice president, Kamala Harris, apparently told Blake himself how proud she was of him.
If that doesn’t sound right to you, it didn’t to Megyn Kelly either:
PROUD of him? He’s accused of breaking into a sleeping woman’s house, sexually assaulting her, humiliating her & later returning to harass her. Then the cops she called for help say he resisted arrest, assaulted them & went for his knife. How about a word for his victim, Senator?
After Sen. Harris praised Jacob Blake, saying she was proud of him, Megyn Kelly called her out.
She brought up the inconvenient facts about the Blake case. That he is accused of breaking into a woman’s house and assaulting her.
After she called the cops, he resisted arrest and went for a deadly weapon.
By no means does it appear that Jacob Blake is a victim of “r****t” cops or “police brutality.”
Instead, he is a man who allegedly broke the law and incited the consequences.
Kelly also brings up the fact that Harris, someone who claims to be a champion of women’s rights, is neglecting this victim.
It seems the woman who wants to be vice president considers Blake to be a role model or hero.
Black L***s M****r and the media seem fine with promoting an inaccurate portrait of Blake, in order to push their narrative.
But why would a woman seeking high office do the same? Recently, Joe Biden scrambled to condemn the violence that has rocked so many American cities.
After all that, his running mate praises a man who should face trial for his long list of charges.
Seems like the Democratic Party has their priorities all mixed up.
Ever since Jacob Blake was shot in Kenosha by poli... (
show quote)
If so, he should have been allowed to live to face said charges.
thom w wrote:
What knife? Where is the evidence of the knife? Having warrants is not normally a capital offense. Offending a cop is not supposed to be a capital offense. On more than one occasion I have said to a cop that just because he isn't getting any at home, doesn't give him the right to F**k me. I wasn't shot, but then again, I wasn't black.
Wisconsin AG says that the slime had a knife.
That is good enough for me.
Architect1776 wrote:
Wisconsin AG says that the slime had a knife.
That is good enough for me.
Seems to be something they don't understand. A knife can k**l every bit as easily as a firearm at close range.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
thom w wrote:
If so, he should have been allowed to live to face said charges.
If you are a cop, within afew feet of a subject, and his back is at you and he reaches for something you hae no idea what it is. You hesitate for a little as 1 second. If that something is a knife you are dead. If it's a crowbar you are dead. A gun--still dead. If that subject has any kind of weapon or anything that looks like a weapon and moves toward you, it will take more than 1 second for you to start to react and another second to pull a trigger. A person can move 6 feet in those 2 seconds. A cop has 2 choices. shoot or die. If you are that cop what choice would you make?
scooter1 wrote:
Seems to be something they don't understand. A knife can k**l every bit as easily as a firearm at close range.
Or better, personal experience.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.