Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Three Women in Ultraviolet and Infrared
Sep 6, 2020 10:13:25 #
smf85
Loc: Freeport, IL
Three women in 330nm ultraviolet.
Three women in 780nm infrared.
Both images were made with:
Nikon D850M-FS
Nikkor UV 105mm
LLC 330nm filter
LLC 780nm filter
The UV lens is actually quite good throughout a range of 290nm-1000nm - unfortunately its depth of field is thin even in visual wavelengths. Its a fully APO lens from 300nm-700nm - which might have something to do with it.
Three women in 780nm infrared.
Both images were made with:
Nikon D850M-FS
Nikkor UV 105mm
LLC 330nm filter
LLC 780nm filter
The UV lens is actually quite good throughout a range of 290nm-1000nm - unfortunately its depth of field is thin even in visual wavelengths. Its a fully APO lens from 300nm-700nm - which might have something to do with it.
Sep 6, 2020 14:05:22 #
do you have any which didn't use either of the filters? it would be good to compare them. is there a way to achieve the same in PS?
Sep 6, 2020 16:08:13 #
smf85
Loc: Freeport, IL
toxdoc42 wrote:
do you have any which didn't use either of the filters? it would be good to compare them. is there a way to achieve the same in PS?
Yes I do.
There isn’t any way to get the effect in PS. It’s too dependent on UV and IR wavelength interactions with the skin. A CGI system could simulate it.
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Sep 7, 2020 01:50:03 #
Sep 7, 2020 07:53:15 #
toxdoc42 wrote:
do you have any which didn't use either of the filters? it would be good to compare them. is there a way to achieve the same in PS?
Choke, gag, cough, how unclean... Photo-shop... it is claimed that PS will even cure COVID!!! Is nothing sacred to PS people?! Your pseudo name speaks legends.. Tox as in Toxic!! Have you no shame???
First of all, recognize that PS is an antiquated program that is held afloat by Mythology and Elitism... as tho a religion. Perhaps the better question would be is there a way of editing a regular photo to achieve a similar look? This opens a world of editing programs and plugins. Most edit programs, unlike PS, do not send thugs around monthly for a tribute as tho a "protection racket" NYC Mafia.
If you must, I cringe, try converting to B&W, perhaps Topaz B&W2 using Platinum. Then in the editing program go to image and negative image and swap white for black. or... Perhaps the other-way around swap and then use BW2. Good luck... in this unsavory venture.
Sep 7, 2020 11:22:27 #
Sep 7, 2020 11:39:58 #
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Sep 7, 2020 11:41:55 #
Rick from NY
Loc: Sarasota FL
dpullum wrote:
Choke, gag, cough, how unclean... Photo-shop... it... (show quote)
I’m having trouble understanding the point of your reply. Why did the question you replied to trigger such a rant against PS? Are you complaining about PS, or photo editing software in general? if you are unhappy with PS, you are not being forced to use it. Others (apparently a LOT of others) like it.
Just curious - do you think that if such editing software was available to, say, Ansel Adams or Scavulo, that they wouldn’t embrace it? Adams always insisted, paraphrasing now, that the “magic” occurred in the processing, not in the camera. His career was built on and his legend was cemented by his post processing techniques and abilities. His methods were just more crude than those available today.
Sep 7, 2020 14:16:28 #
Sep 7, 2020 14:36:08 #
Sep 7, 2020 14:38:39 #
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Sep 7, 2020 21:42:33 #
smf85 wrote:
Three women in 330nm ultraviolet.
Three women in 780nm infrared.
Both images were made with:
Nikon D850M-FS
Nikkor UV 105mm
LLC 330nm filter
LLC 780nm filter
The UV lens is actually quite good throughout a range of 290nm-1000nm - unfortunately its depth of field is thin even in visual wavelengths. Its a fully APO lens from 300nm-700nm - which might have something to do with it.
Three women in 780nm infrared.
Both images were made with:
Nikon D850M-FS
Nikkor UV 105mm
LLC 330nm filter
LLC 780nm filter
The UV lens is actually quite good throughout a range of 290nm-1000nm - unfortunately its depth of field is thin even in visual wavelengths. Its a fully APO lens from 300nm-700nm - which might have something to do with it.
I hope you will forgive me on this one. I performed a single shot HDR effect and colorization in Photoshop on your Super UV shot to see what it would look like. Never seen anything like it.
Sep 8, 2020 08:59:05 #
smf85
Loc: Freeport, IL
Fotoartist wrote:
I hope you will forgive me on this one. I performed a single shot HDR effect and colorization in Photoshop on your Super UV shot to see what it would look like. Never seen anything like it.
Neither have I —- its vaguely reminiscent of solarization. It’s very different.
Sep 10, 2020 10:07:26 #
Sep 11, 2020 09:14:50 #
Fotoartist wrote:
They look like they could be cast in bronze.
And many on here would be happy to polish those bronzes daily! I like the look you achieved.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.