Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Links and Resources
For the Luddites...
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Sep 3, 2020 13:09:20   #
alexol
 
...who continue to eschew the capabilities of camera phones, one more nail.

I came across this today, and it made me think about it again.

https://fstoppers.com/apps/will-camera-flash-make-iphone-professional-camera-514314

Given that so-called "real" cameras have been around 150 years or thereabouts, and phone cameras only 20, and probably only very seriously for the last 5 or so, the level of progress is truly impressive.

Sure, it's more fun to play with our SLRs and mirrorless cameras etc but this is the way the world is going, whether we like it or not.

My expectation is the a camera-toting tourist - already a rare bird indeed but who was a primary supporter of the camera industry - will be extinct shortly, and the only thing keeping cameras alive (or more accurately, priced relatively accessibly) are the enthusiasts.

A quick survey of my semi-immediate family of 19 adults old & young yielded two SLRs (neither in frequent use), two bridge cameras (used relatively often), half a dozen P&Ss (mostly for special occasions), and 22 cel phones used almost daily to take pictures.

Professionals or enthusiasts who want highest quality/largest prints/maximum reach/other special requirements (BIF and so on)/those of use who like to play with our toys etc may not change for a while, but everyone else is well on the way.

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 13:19:19   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
I have a bottom of the line smartphone. I expect that the type of photos I mostly take would not come out well on even a good one. In low light and not close, I use an up to 300mm tele zoom and a flash to stop action since high ISO is too grainy. Yet, someday...

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 13:20:51   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Those who hold onto their DSLRs, do not notice their mirrors are their chains.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2020 13:25:48   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Those who hold onto their DSLRs, do not notice their mirrors are their chains.


But chains are helpful when it snows.

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 13:38:35   #
L-Fox
 
alexol wrote:
...who continue to eschew the capabilities of camera phones, one more nail.

I came across this today, and it made me think about it again.

https://fstoppers.com/apps/will-camera-flash-make-iphone-professional-camera-514314

Given that so-called "real" cameras have been around 150 years or thereabouts, and phone cameras only 20, and probably only very seriously for the last 5 or so, the level of progress is truly impressive.

Sure, it's more fun to play with our SLRs and mirrorless cameras etc but this is the way the world is going, whether we like it or not.

My expectation is the a camera-toting tourist - already a rare bird indeed but who was a primary supporter of the camera industry - will be extinct shortly, and the only thing keeping cameras alive (or more accurately, priced relatively accessibly) are the enthusiasts.

A quick survey of my semi-immediate family of 19 adults old & young yielded two SLRs (neither in frequent use), two bridge cameras (used relatively often), half a dozen P&Ss (mostly for special occasions), and 22 cel phones used almost daily to take pictures.

Professionals or enthusiasts who want highest quality/largest prints/maximum reach/other special requirements (BIF and so on)/those of use who like to play with our toys etc may not change for a while, but everyone else is well on the way.
...who continue to eschew the capabilities of came... (show quote)


Bet the some prehistoric cave artist caught hell when he one day showed up with a 'modern' paint brush.

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 13:50:54   #
Leitz Loc: Solms
 
Those of us who are capable of thinking for ourselves choose the equipment we feel serves our purpose, and we don't concern ourselves with what anyone else uses!

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 13:54:28   #
Strodav Loc: Houston, Tx
 
Leitz wrote:
Those of us who are capable of thinking for ourselves choose the equipment we feel serves our purpose, and we don't concern ourselves with what anyone else uses!



Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 3, 2020 14:08:35   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Leitz wrote:
Those of us who are capable of thinking for ourselves choose the equipment we feel serves our purpose, and we don't concern ourselves with what anyone else uses!


👍👍👍

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 14:27:29   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
Leitz wrote:
Those of us who are capable of thinking for ourselves choose the equipment we feel serves our purpose, and we don't concern ourselves with what anyone else uses!



Reply
Sep 3, 2020 14:29:36   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
alexol wrote:
...who continue to eschew the capabilities of camera phones, one more nail.

I came across this today, and it made me think about it again.

https://fstoppers.com/apps/will-camera-flash-make-iphone-professional-camera-514314

Given that so-called "real" cameras have been around 150 years or thereabouts, and phone cameras only 20, and probably only very seriously for the last 5 or so, the level of progress is truly impressive.

Sure, it's more fun to play with our SLRs and mirrorless cameras etc but this is the way the world is going, whether we like it or not.

My expectation is the a camera-toting tourist - already a rare bird indeed but who was a primary supporter of the camera industry - will be extinct shortly, and the only thing keeping cameras alive (or more accurately, priced relatively accessibly) are the enthusiasts.

A quick survey of my semi-immediate family of 19 adults old & young yielded two SLRs (neither in frequent use), two bridge cameras (used relatively often), half a dozen P&Ss (mostly for special occasions), and 22 cel phones used almost daily to take pictures.

Professionals or enthusiasts who want highest quality/largest prints/maximum reach/other special requirements (BIF and so on)/those of use who like to play with our toys etc may not change for a while, but everyone else is well on the way.
...who continue to eschew the capabilities of came... (show quote)


Just curious, when was the last time you saw a thread, or even a p;ost denigrating cell phone cameras on UHH?

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 15:33:17   #
henrycrafter Loc: Orem Utah
 
Amen brother Ben somebody stole my mammy's hen!!!!!

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Sep 3, 2020 16:37:51   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
Strodav wrote:



Reply
Sep 3, 2020 18:34:34   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
alexol wrote:
...who continue to eschew the capabilities of camera phones, one more nail.

I came across this today, and it made me think about it again.

https://fstoppers.com/apps/will-camera-flash-make-iphone-professional-camera-514314

Given that so-called "real" cameras have been around 150 years or thereabouts, and phone cameras only 20, and probably only very seriously for the last 5 or so, the level of progress is truly impressive.

Sure, it's more fun to play with our SLRs and mirrorless cameras etc but this is the way the world is going, whether we like it or not.

My expectation is the a camera-toting tourist - already a rare bird indeed but who was a primary supporter of the camera industry - will be extinct shortly, and the only thing keeping cameras alive (or more accurately, priced relatively accessibly) are the enthusiasts.

A quick survey of my semi-immediate family of 19 adults old & young yielded two SLRs (neither in frequent use), two bridge cameras (used relatively often), half a dozen P&Ss (mostly for special occasions), and 22 cel phones used almost daily to take pictures.

Professionals or enthusiasts who want highest quality/largest prints/maximum reach/other special requirements (BIF and so on)/those of use who like to play with our toys etc may not change for a while, but everyone else is well on the way.
...who continue to eschew the capabilities of came... (show quote)


How many cell phone photographers are going to buy and learn to use studio lighting equipment with their phone cameras? That just goes against the reasons most people use them.

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 19:01:19   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
How many cell phone photographers are going to buy and learn to use studio lighting equipment with their phone cameras? That just goes against the reasons most people use them.


No, No, No, not photographers - IMHO the the correct nomenclature is "phoneographer"!

Reply
Sep 3, 2020 19:32:09   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
quixdraw wrote:
No, No, No, not photographers - IMHO the the correct nomenclature is "phoneographer"!


The cameras in cell phones ARE cameras, and those who use them are photographers. You can find some mighty fine cell phone photos on the internet. They are much better cameras than the point and shoot cameras from the film era.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.