Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What lens to use?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Aug 21, 2020 13:57:29   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
Interesting! I didn't know they made an ILC with a 1" sensor.

Reply
Aug 21, 2020 14:50:14   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
PHRubin wrote:
Interesting! I didn't know they made an ILC with a 1" sensor.


Yes. The Nikon J1 has the CX or 1" sensor. It allows me to crop to 100% without loss of detail, which I can't do with a bridge camera's 1/2.3" sensor.

Reply
Aug 21, 2020 22:13:34   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Scruples wrote:
The other day I was walking around a Salt Marsh near my home. Then, I saw a reddish-orange bird with black wings. It was a Scarlet Tanager. I snuck along to get a photograph with my Canon 5D Mark IV and and it’s 28-135mm lens. It wasn’t close enough to get a definitive tack sharp photograph. Quickly, I switched to a 70-300mm lens. I also had poor results. I’m actually embarrassed to attach these blurred photos.

My question is this. Should I invest in a 150-600mm lens to obtain tack sharp photos of some birds?
The other day I was walking around a Salt Marsh ne... (show quote)


No NO NOOO.. Please buy a Canon 100-400 Mark II lens. You will be much happier. You can also use a 1.4x teleconverter on it and it will work fine. It's smaller, lighter, SHARPER, and they are 100% compatible where as you never know what kind of things you'll run into using a 3rd party lens like the Tamron or Sigma.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2020 22:52:07   #
Gampa
 
I agree!

Reply
Aug 21, 2020 23:59:03   #
xt2 Loc: British Columbia, Canada
 
Scruples wrote:
The other day I was walking around a Salt Marsh near my home. Then, I saw a reddish-orange bird with black wings. It was a Scarlet Tanager. I snuck along to get a photograph with my Canon 5D Mark IV and and it’s 28-135mm lens. It wasn’t close enough to get a definitive tack sharp photograph. Quickly, I switched to a 70-300mm lens. I also had poor results. I’m actually embarrassed to attach these blurred photos.

My question is this. Should I invest in a 150-600mm lens to obtain tack sharp photos of some birds?
The other day I was walking around a Salt Marsh ne... (show quote)


If you can afford it and want it badly enough...

Reply
Aug 22, 2020 09:53:02   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
You'll probably find the 100-400L II is:

a) Sharper
b) More versatile
c) Can be extended by the 1.4x III for more reach
d) Is more expensive
e) Is heavier and larger, maybe negating the idea of a walkaround lens
f) Requires practice for sharp images of moving subjects with the appropriate camera configuration, just like all camera equipment


Judy 2011, who no longer posts on UHH, uses the 100-400L II. She handholds it and gets fantastic photos. It doesn't seem to be too heavy for her. She doesn't shoot bif, but in situ, yet often at a distance with great effect. Using a crop sensor camera, it provides fov up to 600mm.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.