Nalu wrote:
As many have said, a live histogram is a representation of a jpeg that the processor in the camera has calculated. It is not a representation of a raw file, which contains more information (so they say). So you are not seeing everything that is there if you are shooting raw. This can result in folks thinking they are pushing the limit when exposing to the right, when in fact there is more room to the right before an image is overexposed. So if you trust your histogram when exposing to the right, you may be loosing some valuable information and under exposing: not getting the best image quality you can achieve. So my question would be, is there a way to adjust the sensitivity or the camera’s sensor that more reflects a more accurate representation of what the histogram of a raw file would look like rather than a representation of the jpeg. At least with the Sony cameras, this can somewhat be addressed with the use of Zebras in that one can make adjustments in the camera set up. Thoughts?
As many have said, a live histogram is a represent... (
show quote)
Other recent threads have discussed this. One idea is to set the camera to as low as possible in terms of picture quality settings and to get the white balance correct in camera or use uniWB which my camera doesn't have. Others have demonstrated that the individual color histogram is really quite close to raw.
Good video, worth watching to the info about white balance at the end.