The media vs. the t***h (Page 3): So why would Biden choose a candidate that will only improve his odds in a 100% guaranteed state? As I read the tea leaves, Harris can only hurt Biden...

Tex-s

thom w wrote:

Someone in the past may have chosen a VP candidate because they were the most qualified for the job, but generally the VP is chosen based on how they may help the e******n. Was Palin most qualified? Was Dan potato Quale? A candidate's job is to get elected. If they get elected all the other things become important. Under Johnson people forgot all about Humphrey.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUnHZAUR6hE

So why would Biden choose a candidate that will only improve his odds in a 100% guaranteed state? As I read the tea leaves, Harris can only hurt Biden in PA, FL, OH, NC, WI, MI, VA, and several other states.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Fotoartist wrote:

Memory challenged are we? The so called Obama recovery after a recession was acknowledged by economists as the worst in history. The only president to Never see the GDP go above 3.0 Trump left Obama's recovery in the dust setting all new records.

You believe that because Trump said it. You could easily find out if it's true, but you don't want to. Somehow Trump psychologically satisfies something you were missing. I don't really understand all that, but I don't think there is another explanation.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Tex-s wrote:

So why would Biden choose a candidate that will only improve his odds in a 100% guaranteed state? As I read the tea leaves, Harris can only hurt Biden in PA, FL, OH, NC, WI, MI, VA, and several other states.

You apparently misunderstood me. I was only making the case that traditionally helping win the e******n was the main qualification. I have no idea if that was what Biden was thinking when he picked her. He knows how everything works, and she's tough as nails.

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

thom w wrote:

You apparently misunderstood me. I was only making the case that traditionally helping win the e******n was the main qualification. I have no idea if that was what Biden was thinking when he picked her. He knows how everything works, and she's tough as nails.

tough?? she melted like ice cream when debated by Tulsi Gabbard..

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

thom w wrote:

You apparently misunderstood me. I was only making the case that traditionally helping win the e******n was the main qualification. I have no idea if that was what Biden was thinking when he picked her. He knows how everything works, and she's tough as nails.

Biden did not pick her the DNC is responsible.

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

letmedance wrote:

Biden did not pick her the DNC is responsible.

Bidens handlers are trying their best to keep him quiet & from getting lost.

btbg

mwalsh wrote:

All the alt-righties claiming the Joe chose her solely on the basis of being black and female are truly showing shallowness of thought process (lack of thought process.)

That was the just the first two criteria...not the sole criteria.

All the mooing about how he should of chosen the most qualified person without consideration to g****r or race is also shallow. There are tons of qualifed people....there are also many qualified women of color...

You are right there are many qualified women of color, so why didn't Biden choose one? And don't you think there is something wrong with Biden's first two criteria being race and g****r?