Fotoartist wrote:
Who is this Chump guy you mention?
As far as your last point, that Obama was responsible for the longest economic recovery, I have one question.
What was the exact policy that Obama came up with that was responsible for this success? Not the Stimulus bill. That money went to the states to pay their debts and to the unions and chosen companies like Solyndra. Maybe it was Cash for Clunkers that was the great idea. I really don't know. Why don't you tell us?
Oh, Bless your heart.
So now, when you're not extolling the non-existing virtues of chump, you want to play ignorant?
You know how to use the internet, look it up.
Do you remember back when you 'blamed' Clinton, saying he was responsible for NAFTA when, if FACT is was a Republican brainchild?
Now, you want to play LWW?
I notice you skip right over my response to LWW (multiple listings) and his games. You simply jump into dumb mode because I mentioned Obama.
You know as well as everyone else on this forum that low unemployment is a key factor in the economy. You just can't swallow the idea that what took place under Obama is what kicked it into high gear at that time. AND, you don't seem able to accept the FACT that chump inherited that growing economy but wants to take credit for it. Well, how's that working out? GDP -32? Unemployment 14.7% now down to 11/1% - Maybe we should all go play another round of golf and hope the problems will 'disappear'.
Surveys of economists show overwhelming agreement that the stimulus reduced unemployment so, why you want to split hairs and separate 'policy' from 'stimulus' is unclear. To me, action was needed. Whether it was policy or a stimulus is irrelevant to the outcome.
So, once again, you know how to use the internet, look it up.
You can take the chump road and deny and deflect all you want.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.