Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Comet Neowise
Jul 17, 2020 18:59:23   #
jamacq Loc: Virginia
 
Comet Neowise from Shenandoah National Park on 7/14. Nikon D850, Nikkor 200-500mm @200mm, ISO3200, f/6.3, 25x4sec stacked using Sequator. These were on a fixed tripod so there is some amount of star trail.

Jeff


(Download)

Reply
Jul 17, 2020 19:09:39   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 

Reply
Jul 17, 2020 19:30:03   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
Thanks! I am going for it tonight and wondered what lens choice. I have the 200-500 and will use on my Z6. Some with much higher ISO.

Saw it the last two nights at locations with darker skys, higher elevation, and crystal clear sky. We’ll see what tonight brings.

I could drag out my 40-year-old C8. It will track but probably too much mm.

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2020 20:19:50   #
jamacq Loc: Virginia
 
I tried 200-500 and recommend going with lower focal length. I would try ~120mm or so. At 200mm, the comet filled the frame. There is only the slightest crop in the above picture and that was only to remove some gradient at the bottom.

Reply
Jul 17, 2020 20:29:12   #
Ballard Loc: Grass Valley, California
 
jamacq wrote:
I tried 200-500 and recommend going with lower focal length. I would try ~120mm or so. At 200mm, the comet filled the frame. There is only the slightest crop in the above picture and that was only to remove some gradient at the bottom.


Very nice shot. I just posted an image taken at 500mm and it came out well but does crop off the tail. I'll probably be trying again at a shorter focal length.
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-656332-1.html

Reply
Jul 17, 2020 20:46:13   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
jamacq wrote:
I tried 200-500 and recommend going with lower focal length. I would try ~120mm or so. At 200mm, the comet filled the frame. There is only the slightest crop in the above picture and that was only to remove some gradient at the bottom.


Two other choices for me are the 24-70 Z lens or the AF-P 70-300. Maybe I’ll try the latter first.

Reply
Jul 17, 2020 22:54:59   #
Ballard Loc: Grass Valley, California
 
IDguy wrote:
Two other choices for me are the 24-70 Z lens or the AF-P 70-300. Maybe I’ll try the latter first.


I'll probably try my 70-200mm f2.8 next. My plan will be to do few test shots at ISO 32K to adjust to zoom to a point to fill but not over fill the image with the comet.

Reply
 
 
Jul 17, 2020 23:09:27   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
Ballard wrote:
I'll probably try my 70-200mm f2.8 next. My plan will be to do few test shots at ISO 32K to adjust to zoom to a point to fill but not over fill the image with the comet.


Let’s compare what we get!

This is a case where the f2.8 rules!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.