Just curious, do you have anything to back that meme up.
I see a couple of problems just on the face of the meme...nobody "broke in" ...they just walked in peacefully...and apparently nobody threatened the couple....
So was Rasheen even there? And if he was...so what?
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
mwalsh wrote:
Just curious, do you have anything to back that meme up.
I see a couple of problems just on the face of the meme...nobody "broke in" ...they just walked in peacefully...and apparently nobody threatened the couple....
So was Rasheen even there? And if he was...so what?
So the gate broke itself? The property was posted, but I guess that doesn't apply to left wing terrorists.
phcaan wrote:
So the gate broke itself? The property was posted, but I guess that doesn't apply to left wing terrorists.
Are you this seriously uninformed?
They walked through the gate without breaking it at all...it was open...plenty of video of that.
The photo of the broken gate later...I kind of think the rich rednecks did that damage themselves and took a photo to bolster their sorry case that the wild ones were threatening their very lives and property.
And just what do you think posted means to any city folk.
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
mwalsh wrote:
Are you this seriously uninformed?
They walked through the gate without breaking it at all...it was open...plenty of video of that.
The photo of the broken gate later...I kind of think the rich rednecks did that damage themselves and took a photo to bolster their sorry case that the wild ones were threatening their very lives and property.
And just what do you think posted means to any city folk.
Which CNN affiliate do you watch?
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
mwalsh wrote:
Are you this seriously uninformed?
They walked through the gate without breaking it at all...it was open...plenty of video of that.
The photo of the broken gate later...I kind of think the rich rednecks did that damage themselves and took a photo to bolster their sorry case that the wild ones were threatening their very lives and property.
And just what do you think posted means to any city folk.
So you agree they committed breaking and entering.
breaking and entering
n. 1) the criminal act of entering a residence or other enclosed property through the slightest amount of force (even pushing open a door), without authorization. https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=98
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
And the mob did threaten thye home owner as well as threaten to k**l his dog. It's a gated community. If the gate is open, there is no "gated" community
LWW wrote:
So you agree they committed breaking and entering.
breaking and entering
n. 1) the criminal act of entering a residence or other enclosed property through the slightest amount of force (even pushing open a door), without authorization. https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=98When did any of the wild ones "enter(ing) a residence or other enclosed property"
(fences prolly don't create an enclosed property)
Are you saying that you believe they committed breaking and entering to sidewalks and street?
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
mwalsh wrote:
When did any of the wild ones "enter(ing) a residence or other enclosed property"
(fences prolly don't create an enclosed property)
Are you saying that you believe they committed breaking and entering to sidewalks and street?
Are you saying a fenced area isn’t enclosed?
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
mwalsh wrote:
When did any of the wild ones "enter(ing) a residence or other enclosed property"
(fences prolly don't create an enclosed property)
Are you saying that you believe they committed breaking and entering to sidewalks and street?
Your ardent defense of this mob tells us all we need to know about you.
LWW wrote:
Are you saying a fenced area isn’t enclosed?
Legal definitions could vary by locale, but no a fenced area would not generally be considered an enclosed property (no roof.)
phcaan wrote:
Your ardent defense of this mob tells us all we need to know about you.
Where have I defended the protesters?
I am just defending t***h a little bit.
Your ardent desire to pillory the protesters with exaggerations and unt***hs also says plenty about you.
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
mwalsh wrote:
Where have I defended the protesters?
I am just defending t***h a little bit.
Your ardent desire to pillory the protesters with exaggerations and unt***hs also says plenty about you.
What desire? These folks leave smoking burned cities and trash piles in their wake, what's to imagine?
Your t***h always seems to have a left slant.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
mwalsh wrote:
Legal definitions could vary by locale, but no a fenced area would not generally be considered an enclosed property (no roof.)
STOP THE PRESSES!!!Mwalsh has had declared he knows more about the law than a fleet of attorneys’
phcaan wrote:
What desire? These folks leave smoking burned cities and trash piles in their wake, what's to imagine?
Your t***h always seems to have a left slant.
There you go again...
From what I have seen and read, "these folks" walked through a gate, chanted a bunch, had guns waved at them, went on to the mayors house and chanted some more, then went home.
Which houses or structures in the neighborhood in question were burned....what property destroyed...what trash piles left in this nice neighborhood?
I am asking quite sincerely as it seems I missed the coverage of the mayhem in this particular neighborhood....and this neighborhood...this incident is what we are talking about.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.