Challenge: Multiple/Double Exposure July 13-17, 2020
Jul 13, 2020 00:35:12 #
Jul 13, 2020 02:38:25 #
PAToGraphy wrote:
Thanks, Larry for hosting a Free Challenge Weekend... (show quote)
Good start Pat and thanks for hosting, loving #3
Jul 13, 2020 02:39:52 #
William wrote:
not multiple but feels like
You are right Bill
Mirror gives the effect of a multiple exposure
Jul 13, 2020 03:02:31 #
William wrote:
use the lens
abuse the lens
crack that whip
abuse the lens
crack that whip
Again the effect of a double exposure
Good piece of Art Bill
Jul 13, 2020 03:29:18 #
creativ simon wrote:
Again the effect of a double exposure
Good piece of Art Bill
Again the effect of a double exposure
Good piece of Art Bill
good got a bed to lay on out
Jul 13, 2020 03:50:01 #
William wrote:
good got a bed to lay on out
Layers without layers
Trick of the eye
Jul 13, 2020 03:50:43 #
William wrote:
good got a bed to lay on out
Galactic light show
Jul 13, 2020 10:07:09 #
PAToGraphy wrote:
Thanks, Larry for hosting a Free Challenge Weekend... (show quote)
One of my specialties is multiple images of flowers - I use one for my avatar. The first three were multiple exposures in the camera on film, scanned and enhanced in Photoshop. The rest are digital captures combined on layers in Photoshop. I find with flowers, combining them in Lighten mode works well as it brings the lightest parts of each layer forward.
Jul 13, 2020 11:18:45 #
Rolk wrote:
Great images, Pat! Unfortunately, my Canon EOS60D doesn't do "in camera" doubles, so I'll have to rely on Photoshop, but I did want to say, as a former wedding photographer (many, many, many years ago), it was so much easier to do doubles on film, and clients would pay extra for well executed ones. I wish I had some of those, but the only "in camera" double I have is one I've posted many times before, so I hope you don't mind.
Tim
Tim
I like this, I have not done any ever so will read that article and see what I can do.
Jul 13, 2020 11:35:32 #
Rolk wrote:
Great images, Pat! Unfortunately, my Canon EOS60D doesn't do "in camera" doubles, so I'll have to rely on Photoshop, but I did want to say, as a former wedding photographer (many, many, many years ago), it was so much easier to do doubles on film, and clients would pay extra for well executed ones. I wish I had some of those, but the only "in camera" double I have is one I've posted many times before, so I hope you don't mind.
Tim
Tim
Good work Tim
Jul 13, 2020 11:36:30 #
William wrote:
the lens can work every/thing
like the double exposures@@
like the double exposures@@
Agreed
Jul 13, 2020 11:37:47 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
One of my specialties is multiple images of flowers - I use one for my avatar. The first three were multiple exposures in the camera on film, scanned and enhanced in Photoshop. The rest are digital captures combined on layers in Photoshop. I find with flowers, combining them in Lighten mode works well as it brings the lightest parts of each layer forward.
Great colorful set John, well worked
Jul 13, 2020 11:43:02 #
Jul 13, 2020 16:41:02 #
William wrote:
like it well/rare/done
Well that's an important discovery!
Jul 13, 2020 16:42:01 #
Rolk wrote:
Great images, Pat! Unfortunately, my Canon EOS60D doesn't do "in camera" doubles, so I'll have to rely on Photoshop, but I did want to say, as a former wedding photographer (many, many, many years ago), it was so much easier to do doubles on film, and clients would pay extra for well executed ones. I wish I had some of those, but the only "in camera" double I have is one I've posted many times before, so I hope you don't mind.
Tim
Tim
p1 That's cool, Tim and I never tire of seeing it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.