Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Links and Resources
The World's Fastest Camera Is Frankly Mind-Boggling
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 13, 2020 21:10:27   #
rgproctor Loc: Central Florida
 
Scientists developed a new camera that can take a whopping 70 trillion frames per second.
One of the inventors calls the new process compressed ultrafast spectral photography, or CUSP.
The study appears in the April 29 edition of Nature Communications.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a32434104/worlds-fastest-camera/

Reply
May 13, 2020 21:26:17   #
BassmanBruce Loc: Middle of the Mitten
 
I could probably never convince my wife I need one of these.
I do feel a gas attack though!

Reply
May 13, 2020 22:43:20   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
So how long would it take to process 70-Trillion images in Lightroom..? I suspect that I would need a faster computer.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2020 05:35:07   #
tshift Loc: Overland Park, KS.
 
sippyjug104 wrote:
So how long would it take to process 70-Trillion images in Lightroom..? I suspect that I would need a faster computer.


i hadn't thought about that. I probably won't live long enough!! LOL Thanks

Tom

Reply
May 14, 2020 07:14:47   #
Dalek Loc: Detroit, Miami, Goffstown
 
If I had one of those, and printed a 1 second picture someone would ask if I counted the frames.

Reply
May 14, 2020 08:08:58   #
Jim70 Loc: Delaware
 
Of course, the image with perfect composition and exposure would be at 2,976,482!

Reply
May 14, 2020 08:11:38   #
SonyBug
 
For me 70 trillion is overkill, I would be happy with 50...

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2020 09:34:01   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
Wonder what an SD card would cost that could store that much (lol).

Reply
May 14, 2020 10:37:40   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Probably for recording the splitting of atoms.

Reply
May 14, 2020 12:13:29   #
Strange
 
How many frames would it take to record light traveling one inch?

Reply
May 14, 2020 13:08:58   #
FrumCA
 
This camera would definitely stop BIF motion wouldn't it??

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2020 13:27:20   #
fotoman150
 
SonyBug wrote:
For me 70 trillion is overkill, I would be happy with 50...


LOL

Reply
May 14, 2020 13:38:31   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
No one could live long enough to review even one second's exposures!

Reply
May 14, 2020 14:59:08   #
PhotogHobbyist Loc: Bradford, PA
 
sippyjug104 wrote:
So how long would it take to process 70-Trillion images in Lightroom..? I suspect that I would need a faster computer.


I'll give you an example. If you processed 1 million photographs at a rate of 1,000 images a day, 7 days a week,52 weeks a year it would take you approximately 3 years and 9 months to process them. Raise the processing rate to 1 million photos a day and 1 trillion photos could be processed in about 3,750 years. So, for 70 trillion photos, it would take approximately 262,500 years. That's a project I do not think I'd want to even consider.

Reply
May 14, 2020 16:32:56   #
TreborLow
 
cambriaman wrote:
No one could live long enough to review even one second's exposures!


My crude calculation says at one image per second (processing or viewing) a one second exposure would take over two million YEARS! What would we evolved into by then??

I am very content at age 79 with my Pentax and some new and some 50 year old lenses.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.