Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Photographing very dark animal.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Apr 29, 2020 18:52:05   #
Bubbee Loc: Aventura, Florida
 
I take loads of pictures of my Tuxedo, Bootsie; and I'm attaching pictures of him, plus a couple of my Daughter's and Friend's totally black cats. I usually take Bootsie with my SB800 on my D7100, bouncing slightly to the right, and with the wide angle attachment and in TTL mode. I took Moki, my Daughter's cat that way,also, but Tillie, my Friend's (one of 10 cats) was in the yard, so I used the ambient light with a drop of flash fill.
I take loads of pictures of Bootsie.....my favorite subject, and I'd love to see the pictures of your gorgeous dog!
Good luck!


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 29, 2020 20:09:53   #
rvharvey Loc: Southern New Jersey
 
I am webmaster for our Seeing Eye Puppy Raiser website. I have found that the best way to get shots with black labs in them is by editing the picture in Abobe Photo Shop Elements using the "Enhance/Adjust Lighting/Shadows-Highlights" feature. Sometimes I cut out the black labs with the Marguee tool, use the above sequence on it and paste it back into the original photo. You need to erase the overlay. Finally, I reduce the pictures for the web and no one can tell that it was shopped.

Reply
Apr 29, 2020 21:59:09   #
fotoman150
 
dpullum wrote:
Use HDR.


Sounds nice but doesn’t the dog have remain still through each exposure?

Reply
 
 
Apr 29, 2020 22:09:24   #
fotoman150
 
Gene51 wrote:
There is so much nonsense about camera meters doing this or that, or being fooled.

I call it nonsense because it is impossible for a meter to do anything on its own. It can't be "fooled". However, a photographer can misuse the metering system because he/she doesn't fully understand exactly how it works or how to interpret the readings - thus fooled. After all, it's just a measurement tool, like a meat thermometer measures the temperature of meat. If one is not familiar with how it works, one might make the mistake of putting the probe too close to the bone, or almost clear through to the other side - which could result in an overdone or underdone prime roast rib. Or, to add another layer of complexity, how you cook the meat can impact what your result will be - a low cooking temp and long cooking time will result in a evenly cooked meat from face to face. High temp cooking will result in great "bark" (the caramelized crust on flame-cooked or high temp cooked meat), and sometimes a blue center, where the meat has a gradient from well done to rare to well done. In the hands of a skilled cook, these things are not problems, and the thermometer doesn't lie. But in the hands of someone less experienced success is a goal that is not always achieved.
There is so much nonsense about camera meters doin... (show quote)


That’s the most intelligent response so far. Why not shoot in manual and check the histogram. Then one won’t have to worry about the meter being fooled. If one doesn’t know how to shoot in manual, he doesn’t understand how to use the camera and should either learn manual or quit shooting.

Reply
Apr 29, 2020 22:47:22   #
Boris77
 
rmg49 wrote:
I have a very dark dog. I am looking for suggestions for the best way to photograph him without using a flash. His coat is very black and it is hard to get any definition of his features. Any suggestions are appreciated.


Get dog to roll around in a dust wallow. Even out the effect with cloth mitt. Photograph away. Balance tones in editing program of your choice.
I had a black dog that showed me this trick back in the days of film. Fortunately I shot B&W and processed and printed it myself.
Boris

Reply
Apr 30, 2020 18:26:42   #
rvharvey Loc: Southern New Jersey
 
Here are shots of two dogs, a yellow and a black Lab. I took one photo with flash and one without. Then I used the "shadows" feature from PS Elements (see my previous post) on the one taken without flash. It also enhanced the yellow Lab's definition. You can play around with the settings until you get the results you want.

With flash
With flash...

Without flash
Without flash...

Above photo enhanced with PS Elements
Above photo enhanced with PS Elements...

Reply
May 1, 2020 06:41:13   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
fotoman150 wrote:
That’s the most intelligent response so far. Why not shoot in manual and check the histogram. Then one won’t have to worry about the meter being fooled. If one doesn’t know how to shoot in manual, he doesn’t understand how to use the camera and should either learn manual or quit shooting.



Reply
 
 
May 1, 2020 06:45:28   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
IDguy wrote:
WRONG!

Like with snow, it is counter intuitive because you are correcting what the light meter is doing.

Another choice is to spot meter.


PH is not wrong. He did qualify his answer with "If, on the other hand, the dark subject is the majority of the scene or if spot metering the dark area, then the dark part will be overexposed, but that may be what is needed for a very dark subject."

YOU are WRONG!!!!

And you owe him an apology. Or maybe your reading comprehension is poor. Just sayin' Play nicely in the sandbox.

Reply
May 1, 2020 09:22:53   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
Sometimes it's a matter of compromse. It may be a cliche but sometimes the best you can do, is all that can be done

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.