Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
4x5 Kodachrome Sheet Film
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 16, 2020 13:11:13   #
tomc601 Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
Yes, it did exist. I found two transparencies going through old family photos that my mother had. The story I heard is that one of my mother's cousins was learning photography and he took these shots in our Bronx apartment. I always wanted to scan them but never took the time. Thanks to the virus I decided to give it a go. I have an Epson V600 scanner that scans transparencies but only up to 2.25 inches wide. So, I scanned the images twice and stitched them in Photoshop. The transparencies were not stored very well and had lots of dust and scratches so it took quite a while to get them to where I wanted. Also, because our cousin was learning photography, his focus was not the best. One of the images I am happy with the focus after using a few different methods to get it sharp. The other was really far gone but it is improved from the original. What's remarkable to me however is the quality of the colors and how they have stood up all these years in a box under a bed or in a garage.

I'm the little guy in the yellow shorts. These were shot at Easter time and I'm guessing that would make me just short of 2 years old. This June I'll be 75. Let me know what you think.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 13:16:33   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
tomc601 wrote:
Yes, it did exist. I found two transparencies going through old family photos that my mother had. The story I heard is that one of my mother's cousins was learning photography and he took these shots in our Bronx apartment. I always wanted to scan them but never took the time. Thanks to the virus I decided to give it a go. I have an Epson V600 scanner that scans transparencies but only up to 2.25 inches wide. So, I scanned the images twice and stitched them in Photoshop. The transparencies were not stored very well and had lots of dust and scratches so it took quite a while to get them to where I wanted. Also, because our cousin was learning photography, his focus was not the best. One of the images I am happy with the focus after using a few different methods to get it sharp. The other was really far gone but it is improved from the original. What's remarkable to me however is the quality of the colors and how they have stood up all these years in a box under a bed or in a garage.

I'm the little guy in the yellow shorts. These were shot at Easter time and I'm guessing that would make me just short of 2 years old. This June I'll be 75. Let me know what you think.
Yes, it did exist. I found two transparencies goin... (show quote)


Great job with the scan and sticking. Great smiley faces. Love your Dad's tie.

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 13:18:56   #
arperry Loc: Miami/Florida
 
Remarkable restoration, you did extremely well. Except for the fashion they could have been photographed this year.

Reply
 
 
Apr 16, 2020 13:21:14   #
twowindsbear
 
How about posting pix of the actual 4x5 transparencies?

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 13:30:47   #
DocDav Loc: IN
 
Love these but reminds me of the kind of wall paper our mothers had back then and considered, "cool" and the height of "we have arrived". Made me smile

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 13:41:21   #
MoT Loc: Barrington, IL
 
Greatnesses job. I love the wall paper in the second picture. We may have been neighbors as I lived in the Bronx at that time attending NYU graduate school of Engineering. I was just off Kingsbridge road near the reservoir.

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 13:42:58   #
tomc601 Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
MoT wrote:
Greatnesses job. I love the wall paper in the second picture. We may have been neighbors as I lived in the Bronx at that time attending NYU graduate school of Engineering. I was just off Kingsbridge road near the reservoir.


We were on the East side of the Bronx. Around the corner from what is now Einstein Hospital.

Reply
 
 
Apr 16, 2020 13:55:03   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
tomc601 wrote:
Yes, it did exist. I found two transparencies going through old family photos that my mother had. The story I heard is that one of my mother's cousins was learning photography and he took these shots in our Bronx apartment. I always wanted to scan them but never took the time. Thanks to the virus I decided to give it a go. I have an Epson V600 scanner that scans transparencies but only up to 2.25 inches wide. So, I scanned the images twice and stitched them in Photoshop. The transparencies were not stored very well and had lots of dust and scratches so it took quite a while to get them to where I wanted. Also, because our cousin was learning photography, his focus was not the best. One of the images I am happy with the focus after using a few different methods to get it sharp. The other was really far gone but it is improved from the original. What's remarkable to me however is the quality of the colors and how they have stood up all these years in a box under a bed or in a garage.

I'm the little guy in the yellow shorts. These were shot at Easter time and I'm guessing that would make me just short of 2 years old. This June I'll be 75. Let me know what you think.
Yes, it did exist. I found two transparencies goin... (show quote)


Wow! 1947... It must have been quite the year for wild ties! I love the one your Dad is wearing. My sister is your age. I have a few Anscochromes my uncle took of her around 1950 or so. They, too, have survived nicely.

Old Kodachrome can be challenging to scan, because Digital ICE does not work on it. The emulsion is ridged unevenly, where the dye layers are stacked, so the IR dust removal system in the scanner can't function correctly. I believe you've done a great job with these.

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 14:17:05   #
tomc601 Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
burkphoto wrote:
Wow! 1947... It must have been quite the year for wild ties! I love the one your Dad is wearing. My sister is your age. I have a few Anscochromes my uncle took of her around 1950 or so. They, too, have survived nicely.

Old Kodachrome can be challenging to scan, because Digital ICE does not work on it. The emulsion is ridged unevenly, where the dye layers are stacked, so the IR dust removal system in the scanner can't function correctly. I believe you've done a great job with these.


I didn't know that. Thanks for the info and kind words.

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 14:20:12   #
tomc601 Loc: Gilbert, AZ
 
twowindsbear wrote:
How about posting pix of the actual 4x5 transparencies?


Here's a pic of the two original transparencies. I don't have a light table so I just taped them up to screen and shot with iPhone. There's some texture from the monitor visible though the transparencies. Also, you can see they don't lie flat anymore.


(Download)

Reply
Apr 16, 2020 14:56:49   #
twowindsbear
 
tomc601 wrote:
Here's a pic of the two original transparencies. I don't have a light table so I just taped them up to screen and shot with iPhone. There's some texture from the monitor visible though the transparencies. Also, you can see they don't lie flat anymore.


Thanks for posting, both this image & your restorations. I'll add my $0.02, too - great job on the scans! I'm a bit younger than you, but I do remember my dad having an assortment of equally 'wild' ties, and we had flamboyant wall paper, too.

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2020 07:53:04   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
Nice work with the processing.

Reply
Apr 17, 2020 08:16:25   #
BurghByrd Loc: Pittsburgh
 
Biggest chocolate bunny I ever saw!

Reply
Apr 17, 2020 09:36:26   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
That had to be one POWERFUL flash (bulb) used !

Reply
Apr 17, 2020 09:37:25   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
What a great job you did restoring these images! Amazing the color that was retained - well done.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.