Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Lemon Blossoms--two lenses
Apr 13, 2020 18:01:37   #
Katydid Loc: Davis, CA
 
Our one fruit tree, a Meyer Lemon, is covered in lemons and a huge amount of new blooms. I tried shooting with my 40mm Nikon Micro and then my newer 70-300 lens. I have so many throw-aways with the micro, I wonder why I even bother. What can you honestly say about the first three photos using the Micro? Be honest, please. I did read lots of the links on the Macro forum and do realize this is not an easy way to take photos.

The remaining ones are from my new 70-300. It is much easier to use. Last photo has an art filter added.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 13, 2020 18:08:14   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
The shallow depth of field on a macro is a tough thing to use, but I think you did well on the first three. I agree that the 70mm - 300 mm can be easier, especially in quick acquisition and flexibility in distance. The last shot is pretty, the filter made it almost a painting.

Reply
Apr 13, 2020 18:20:01   #
kpmac Loc: Ragley, La
 
Macro is tough, Katy. Your efforts are nice in this set. Practice is all that can be done to get better. Keep at it. It may become one of you favorite ways to shoot.

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2020 19:42:52   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Recommendations: Watch your backrounds - especially distracting hotspots. I use a light diffuser panel in bright sun to lower the highlight/contrasts - https://www.ebay.com/itm/42-110cm-5-in-1-Photo-Round-Studio-Collapsible-Reflector-Light-Diffuser-Kit-Set/220809896317?hash=item33694ba17d:g:giIAAOxyP4dTc6x0

40mm is generally too short for most nature shots - especially with moving subjects. Try a quality +1 diopter close up lens for the front of your 70-300 or a 12mm extension tube to go behind it - or BOTH.
.

Reply
Apr 13, 2020 20:35:41   #
Katydid Loc: Davis, CA
 
UTMike wrote:
The shallow depth of field on a macro is a tough thing to use, but I think you did well on the first three. I agree that the 70mm - 300 mm can be easier, especially in quick acquisition and flexibility in distance. The last shot is pretty, the filter made it almost a painting.


Thanks for looking and for your comments, Mike!

Reply
Apr 13, 2020 20:37:05   #
Katydid Loc: Davis, CA
 
kpmac wrote:
Macro is tough, Katy. Your efforts are nice in this set. Practice is all that can be done to get better. Keep at it. It may become one of you favorite ways to shoot.


I will keep practicing, Ken. Not giving up yet.

Reply
Apr 13, 2020 20:40:17   #
Katydid Loc: Davis, CA
 
Imagemeister, thanks for the suggestions which I will look into. Sounds a bit complicated, tho.


imagemeister wrote:
Recommendations: Watch your backrounds - especially distracting hotspots. I use a light diffuser panel in bright sun to lower the highlight/contrasts - https://www.ebay.com/itm/42-110cm-5-in-1-Photo-Round-Studio-Collapsible-Reflector-Light-Diffuser-Kit-Set/220809896317?hash=item33694ba17d:g:giIAAOxyP4dTc6x0

40mm is generally too short for most nature shots - especially with moving subjects. Try a quality +1 diopter close up lens for the front of your 70-300 or a 12mm extension tube to go behind it - or BOTH.
.
Recommendations: Watch your backrounds - especial... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Apr 14, 2020 17:08:29   #
Cwilson341 Loc: Central Florida
 
Katy, I think you did fine on these and practice will help you refine your technique. I really like the first one because of the less busy background.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.