billnikon wrote:
Generally speaking, as you add glass, you decrease image quality.
I concur,
in general, though certainly there are exceptions, such as applying cellophane tape to frosted glass. But let’s suppose you’re right for the moment. Just
how much is IQ degraded? Obviously, it depends on the quality of the speed booster. Would not some objective MTF analysis be useful for determining this?
Well, billnikon, you made me think about it! So I just conducted my own search, using the keyword phrase:
Modulation Transfer Function of speed booster adapters.
This led me to the following results:
A. This discusses the white paper of Metabones' speed booster
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/01/metabones-magic/ B. Cut the Crop: A Hands-On Review of the Metabones Speed Booster ULTRA [for MFT-mount] - Dec 2015
https://www.rangefinderonline.com/gear/cut-the-crop-a-hands-on-review-of-the-metabones-speed-booster-ultra/ This discusses the IQ but NOT the MTF of this product.
C. Can The Metabones Speed Booster Really Increase Maximum Aperture?
http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/metabones-speed-booster-increase-maximum-aperture ...
however, the link to the White Paper goes to NOTHING on the Metabones site ... and I hate it when NO DATE for the article is
explicitly stated!
D. MTF included in this Press Release July 2015 - pertains to the M43-mount
https://www.metabones.com/article/of/Speed_Booster_ULTRA_0.71x E. About MTF in general:
http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF.html F. On Acutance and Resolution and their relationship to MTF:
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2009/06/have-you-seen-my-acutance/ Comment: This appears to be informative; I plan to review it closely.
G. F led me to a most enjoyable tangential article:
Roger’s Law of New Product Introduction
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/01/rogers-law-of-new-product-introduction/ So in conclusion, for the time being, UNLESS either I or someone else can assuage my concerns
and assuming I can return such an adapter for a full refund within 30 days, I might depend on a crude form of assessing MTF: my eyes.
As a non-professional photographer, is such an ultimate approach unwise?