Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Want an example of FAILED socialism in America? Just look at Indian Reservations.
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Mar 6, 2020 20:40:03   #
EyeSawYou
 
We've all heard about how many bad things the U.S. government did to American Indians in the past. But what about today?

Like most people, the only time I hear about today's American Indians is when people are outraged about sports mascots or team names, like the Washington Redskins. But sports teams' names are the least of Indians' problems.

Did you know that Indians have the highest rate of poverty of any racial group in America? Did you know that alcoholism is more common among Indian youths than among youths in any other ethnic group? Did you know that the rate of child abuse among Indians is twice as high as the national average?

Until I visited Indian reservations for my book, The New Trail of Tears, I didn't know any of this. What was at the root of these terrible problems? I wondered. And the deeper I dug, the more I realized that, between the 19th century and today, nothing has changed: it's still the government.

The two main agencies that oversee the activities of Indians who live on reservations are the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or BIA, and the Bureau of Indian Education, or BIE. Education, economic development, tribal courts, road maintenance, agriculture and social services – the federal government basically funds and controls all of it. It's no wonder Indians say BIA stands for “Bossing Indians Around.”

Together, these two agencies have combined budgets of $3 billion per year, and have 9,000 employees. That's one employee for every 111 Indians on a reservation. Of that $3 billion per year, the BIE uses $850 million of it to educate 42,000 students. That's more than $20,000 per student, compared to a national average of $12,400 per student.

Plenty of other federal agencies also have programs for Indians. For instance, the Indian Health Service had a 2015 budget of over $4.6 billion. And yet, there are widespread and documented reports of nurses being unable to administer basic drugs, of broken resuscitation equipment, and of unsanitary medical facilities.

Obviously, inadequate funding isn't the problem.

The billions of dollars that the federal government spends on Indians every year hasn't made their lives better. In fact, by most measures of economic and social health, the lives of American Indians are only getting worse.

Aside from issues of culture, the only way out of this morass is economic growth, but the reservation system makes this almost impossible. Following a series of treaties and laws over many decades - some well intentioned, some not - the federal government decided to hold Indian land “in trust” in order to prevent non-Indians from ever buying that land. But other than Indians, the only people who have things held in trust for them are children and the mentally incompetent.

Can anything better illustrate the low regard the government has for American Indians?

The awful consequence of this land trust is that Indians can't sell their land, which means they can't use it the same way other Americans do – for example, as collateral to get a loan to start a business. What bank would lend to landowners who don't own their land?

The other effect of this absurdity is that Indians can't develop this land that they don't own. Indian reservations contain almost 30 percent of the nation's coal reserves west of the Mississippi, 50 percent of potential uranium reserves, and 20 percent of known oil and gas reserves. Those resources are estimated to be worth nearly $1.5 trillion. But the vast majority of Indian lands with natural resources remain undeveloped because of federal regulations.

For instance, for Indians to get permission to mine for coal on Indian land requires 49 steps spanning four federal agencies. Each of these 49 steps can take months or years to be approved. There are so many government regulations that just to apply for a permit to dig a hole costs $6,500.

Is it really any wonder that this community is mired in poverty?

So, what can be done?

For starters, end the trust system. Let Indians do what they want with the land they own. Get the massive federal bureaucracy out of the way. Give American Indians the opportunity to embrace the same thing that has lifted millions of other people out of poverty and into the middle class: free enterprise.

It won't happen overnight, and it won't be easy, but it will do a lot more for American Indians than changing the name of the Washington Redskins.

I'm Naomi Schaefer Riley for Prager University.

https://www.prageru.com/video/american-indians-are-still-getting-a-raw-deal/?fbclid=IwAR2WwCRTkEYnm0ieacjm0yID1An7JnwdbWFm9-3nnhGLzCtivPPTj-Te7xs

Reply
Mar 6, 2020 20:57:36   #
travelwp Loc: New Jersey
 
EyeSawYou wrote:
Like most people, the only time I hear about today's American Indians is when people are outraged about sports mascots or team names,


The last time I heard about today's American Indians, was a couple of days ago when she is no longer running for president.

Reply
Mar 6, 2020 21:02:07   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter Loc: Los Angeles
 
travelwp wrote:
The last time I heard about today's American Indians, was a couple of days ago when she is no longer running for president.


You mean faux-Indian 'Liz Forked-Tongue Warren?'

Reply
 
 
Mar 6, 2020 21:04:30   #
travelwp Loc: New Jersey
 
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
You mean faux-Indian 'Liz Forked-Tongue Warren?'


Yes, the very same !

Reply
Mar 6, 2020 21:04:51   #
Mary Kelley Loc: San Diego, CA
 
Your data given here for your book on American Indians (Amerinds or Native Americans or wh**ever various names they're called) was very interesting. I will look forward to reading the book. Please let us UHHers know when & how we can purchase it. I didn't see anything about the numerous casinos those people are operating, which, I've noticed, have considerably improved at least much of the housing on the reservations. I hope you will discuss this too. In keeping with our photography forum, the book will hopefully contain many photos.

Reply
Mar 6, 2020 21:17:45   #
EyeSawYou
 
Mary Kelley wrote:
Your data given here for your book on American Indians (Amerinds or Native Americans or wh**ever various names they're called) was very interesting. I will look forward to reading the book. Please let us UHHers know when & how we can purchase it. I didn't see anything about the numerous casinos those people are operating, which, I've noticed, have considerably improved at least much of the housing on the reservations. I hope you will discuss this too. In keeping with our photography forum, the book will hopefully contain many photos.
Your data given here for your book on American Ind... (show quote)


I apologize for the confusion, this piece was written by Naomi Schaefer Riley of Prager University not myself. :)

Reply
Mar 7, 2020 01:37:35   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
EyeSawYou wrote:
I apologize for the confusion, this piece was written by Naomi Schaefer Riley of Prager University not myself. :)


Now that was funny... someone thinking YOU wrote that piece!!! Must be a newcomer to The Attic.

Reply
 
 
Mar 7, 2020 02:42:55   #
EyeSawYou
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Now that was funny... someone thinking YOU wrote that piece!!! Must be a newcomer to The Attic.


Same could have been said about you D Azz.

Reply
Mar 7, 2020 04:05:04   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Let’s not forget that Hitler copied the reservation system.

Another bit of little known history is WHY the Little Big Horn massacre happened.

Reply
Mar 7, 2020 07:46:55   #
Steelecrique Loc: Pineville, NC
 
Really?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of t***sparency and/or is f**e news. F**e News is the deliberate attempt to publish h**xes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered f**e news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate PragerU Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda, the use of poor sources who have failed fact checks and the publication of misleading information regarding immigration and c*****e c****e.
Detailed Report

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Mixed Fact Checking
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180

History

Founded in 2009 by Dennis Prager and Allen Astrin, PragerU short for Prager University is a non-profit organization that creates videos on various political, economic and philosophical topics from a conservative or right-wing perspective. PragerU is not an academic institution. It is strictly a conservative Youtube video channel and news website. The following disclaimer is located at the bottom of the website: PRAGER UNIVERSITY IS NOT AN ACCREDITED ACADEMIC INSTITUTION AND DOES NOT OFFER CERTIFICATIONS OR DIPLOMAS. BUT IT IS A PLACE WHERE YOU ARE FREE TO LEARN.

Dennis Prager is a Neoconservative radio host and columnist for the far right and questionable WND. Prager believes that Christianity is under threat from secular l*****t universities and therefore created PragerU to counteract them. PragerU has developed two partnership programs to help cultivate relationships with educators. PragerU’s Educator Program supplies teachers with lesson plans and study guides that accompany their videos. Additionally, secondary school teachers and college professors can register their classes through PragerU’s Academic Partnership program, which lets students sign up and allows teachers to monitor their students’ progress.

Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

PragerU is a non-profit that is funded through donors such as hydraulic fracturing billionaires Dan and Farris Wilks and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, which advocates for low immigration and human influenced c*****e c****e denialism. Other large donors all hold conservative views as well. The organization has a $10 million annual budget, of which it spends more than 40% on marketing.

Analysis / Bias

In review, PragerU publishes well produced videos that appeal to a conservative audience. The most frequent topics covered are anti-immigration, human influenced c*****e c****e denialism, Pro-Christian and anti-Muslim themes, as well as advocacy for free market capitalism and harsh criticism of socialism. Further, there are many video’s in support of President Trump. Most videos are less than 5 minutes and come from prominent conservatives such as Dennis Prager and some of which have very poor track records with fact checkers such as Tucker Carlson, Michelle Malkin (Anti-Islam), and Steven Crowder. Further, the right leaning Cato Institute has criticized PragerU for publishing misleading and false information regarding immigration. In general all videos favor the right and denigrate the left with the use of poor sources.

The website also contains an “In The News” section which curates news from other sources such as the BBC and Forbes. However, they also list stories from far right biased sources and questionable ones such as Breitbart, Townhall, PJ Media and Front Page Mag. All news stories are related in some way to PragerU, such as this: The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Smear Campaign Against PragerU. This particular story is a reaction to the SPLC calling PragerU an “indispensable propaganda device for the right.” They further state “PragerU seems to be yet another node on the internet connecting conservative media consumers to the dark corners of the extreme right.”

A factual search reveals they have Half True and Misattributed claims by IFCN Fact Checkers. However, several of their videos come from those that have poor track records with fact checkers such as Michelle Malkin and Steven Crowder to name a few.

Setting the Record Straight on C*****e C****e and Arson in Australia’s Bushfires – False
Overall, we rate PragerU Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda, the use of poor sources who have failed fact checks and the publication of misleading information regarding immigration and c*****e c****e. (D. Van Zandt 3/21/2019) Updated (1/19/2020)

Source: https://www.prageru.com

Reply
Mar 7, 2020 08:25:31   #
WNYShooter Loc: WNY
 
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mediabiasfactcheck/

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

Reply
 
 
Mar 7, 2020 08:35:54   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Steelecrique wrote:
Really?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of t***sparency and/or is f**e news. F**e News is the deliberate attempt to publish h**xes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered f**e news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate PragerU Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda, the use of poor sources who have failed fact checks and the publication of misleading information regarding immigration and c*****e c****e.
Detailed Report

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Mixed Fact Checking
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180

History

Founded in 2009 by Dennis Prager and Allen Astrin, PragerU short for Prager University is a non-profit organization that creates videos on various political, economic and philosophical topics from a conservative or right-wing perspective. PragerU is not an academic institution. It is strictly a conservative Youtube video channel and news website. The following disclaimer is located at the bottom of the website: PRAGER UNIVERSITY IS NOT AN ACCREDITED ACADEMIC INSTITUTION AND DOES NOT OFFER CERTIFICATIONS OR DIPLOMAS. BUT IT IS A PLACE WHERE YOU ARE FREE TO LEARN.

Dennis Prager is a Neoconservative radio host and columnist for the far right and questionable WND. Prager believes that Christianity is under threat from secular l*****t universities and therefore created PragerU to counteract them. PragerU has developed two partnership programs to help cultivate relationships with educators. PragerU’s Educator Program supplies teachers with lesson plans and study guides that accompany their videos. Additionally, secondary school teachers and college professors can register their classes through PragerU’s Academic Partnership program, which lets students sign up and allows teachers to monitor their students’ progress.

Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

PragerU is a non-profit that is funded through donors such as hydraulic fracturing billionaires Dan and Farris Wilks and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, which advocates for low immigration and human influenced c*****e c****e denialism. Other large donors all hold conservative views as well. The organization has a $10 million annual budget, of which it spends more than 40% on marketing.

Analysis / Bias

In review, PragerU publishes well produced videos that appeal to a conservative audience. The most frequent topics covered are anti-immigration, human influenced c*****e c****e denialism, Pro-Christian and anti-Muslim themes, as well as advocacy for free market capitalism and harsh criticism of socialism. Further, there are many video’s in support of President Trump. Most videos are less than 5 minutes and come from prominent conservatives such as Dennis Prager and some of which have very poor track records with fact checkers such as Tucker Carlson, Michelle Malkin (Anti-Islam), and Steven Crowder. Further, the right leaning Cato Institute has criticized PragerU for publishing misleading and false information regarding immigration. In general all videos favor the right and denigrate the left with the use of poor sources.

The website also contains an “In The News” section which curates news from other sources such as the BBC and Forbes. However, they also list stories from far right biased sources and questionable ones such as Breitbart, Townhall, PJ Media and Front Page Mag. All news stories are related in some way to PragerU, such as this: The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Smear Campaign Against PragerU. This particular story is a reaction to the SPLC calling PragerU an “indispensable propaganda device for the right.” They further state “PragerU seems to be yet another node on the internet connecting conservative media consumers to the dark corners of the extreme right.”

A factual search reveals they have Half True and Misattributed claims by IFCN Fact Checkers. However, several of their videos come from those that have poor track records with fact checkers such as Michelle Malkin and Steven Crowder to name a few.

Setting the Record Straight on C*****e C****e and Arson in Australia’s Bushfires – False
Overall, we rate PragerU Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda, the use of poor sources who have failed fact checks and the publication of misleading information regarding immigration and c*****e c****e. (D. Van Zandt 3/21/2019) Updated (1/19/2020)

Source: https://www.prageru.com
Really? br br https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prag... (show quote)


Visit a reservation and get back to me.

Reply
Mar 7, 2020 09:18:50   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
LWW wrote:
Let’s not forget that Hitler copied the reservation system.

Another bit of little known history is WHY the Little Big Horn massacre happened.


If u can find something good about it please post

Reply
Mar 7, 2020 09:30:45   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
EyeSawYou wrote:
We've all heard about how many bad things the U.S. government did to American Indians in the past. But what about today?

Like most people, the only time I hear about today's American Indians is when people are outraged about sports mascots or team names, like the Washington Redskins. But sports teams' names are the least of Indians' problems.

Did you know that Indians have the highest rate of poverty of any racial group in America? Did you know that alcoholism is more common among Indian youths than among youths in any other ethnic group? Did you know that the rate of child abuse among Indians is twice as high as the national average?

Until I visited Indian reservations for my book, The New Trail of Tears, I didn't know any of this. What was at the root of these terrible problems? I wondered. And the deeper I dug, the more I realized that, between the 19th century and today, nothing has changed: it's still the government.

The two main agencies that oversee the activities of Indians who live on reservations are the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or BIA, and the Bureau of Indian Education, or BIE. Education, economic development, tribal courts, road maintenance, agriculture and social services – the federal government basically funds and controls all of it. It's no wonder Indians say BIA stands for “Bossing Indians Around.”

Together, these two agencies have combined budgets of $3 billion per year, and have 9,000 employees. That's one employee for every 111 Indians on a reservation. Of that $3 billion per year, the BIE uses $850 million of it to educate 42,000 students. That's more than $20,000 per student, compared to a national average of $12,400 per student.

Plenty of other federal agencies also have programs for Indians. For instance, the Indian Health Service had a 2015 budget of over $4.6 billion. And yet, there are widespread and documented reports of nurses being unable to administer basic drugs, of broken resuscitation equipment, and of unsanitary medical facilities.

Obviously, inadequate funding isn't the problem.

The billions of dollars that the federal government spends on Indians every year hasn't made their lives better. In fact, by most measures of economic and social health, the lives of American Indians are only getting worse.

Aside from issues of culture, the only way out of this morass is economic growth, but the reservation system makes this almost impossible. Following a series of treaties and laws over many decades - some well intentioned, some not - the federal government decided to hold Indian land “in trust” in order to prevent non-Indians from ever buying that land. But other than Indians, the only people who have things held in trust for them are children and the mentally incompetent.

Can anything better illustrate the low regard the government has for American Indians?

The awful consequence of this land trust is that Indians can't sell their land, which means they can't use it the same way other Americans do – for example, as collateral to get a loan to start a business. What bank would lend to landowners who don't own their land?

The other effect of this absurdity is that Indians can't develop this land that they don't own. Indian reservations contain almost 30 percent of the nation's coal reserves west of the Mississippi, 50 percent of potential uranium reserves, and 20 percent of known oil and gas reserves. Those resources are estimated to be worth nearly $1.5 trillion. But the vast majority of Indian lands with natural resources remain undeveloped because of federal regulations.

For instance, for Indians to get permission to mine for coal on Indian land requires 49 steps spanning four federal agencies. Each of these 49 steps can take months or years to be approved. There are so many government regulations that just to apply for a permit to dig a hole costs $6,500.

Is it really any wonder that this community is mired in poverty?

So, what can be done?

For starters, end the trust system. Let Indians do what they want with the land they own. Get the massive federal bureaucracy out of the way. Give American Indians the opportunity to embrace the same thing that has lifted millions of other people out of poverty and into the middle class: free enterprise.

It won't happen overnight, and it won't be easy, but it will do a lot more for American Indians than changing the name of the Washington Redskins.

I'm Naomi Schaefer Riley for Prager University.

https://www.prageru.com/video/american-indians-are-still-getting-a-raw-deal/?fbclid=IwAR2WwCRTkEYnm0ieacjm0yID1An7JnwdbWFm9-3nnhGLzCtivPPTj-Te7xs
We've all heard about how many bad things the U.S.... (show quote)


Very sad yet very true. I traveled with my Grandmother in the 1950's where we visited several Indian Reservations and the conditions were pathetic then as they are now. This situation is a classic example of the effect of government involvement. The bureaucrats are more concerned with protecting their own jobs and benefits than they are improving the lives of the people they are charged to care for. NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

It is not 'because of the President' neither then nor now. It is the embedded bureaucrats and the bloated expense of maintaining them. Visit the offices of the Indian Affairs and then visit a home on the Reservation and ask yourself which are living better.

The same holds true for the VA medical system. Not the doctors and nurses, but the administrators and the expenses which do not improve the lives and health of our nations patriots.

A typical government employee is a lifetime position compared to the private sector where they expect results to continue ones employment.

Reply
Mar 7, 2020 09:34:44   #
Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio
 
Steelecrique wrote:
Really?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of t***sparency and/or is f**e news. F**e News is the deliberate attempt to publish h**xes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered f**e news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate PragerU Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda, the use of poor sources who have failed fact checks and the publication of misleading information regarding immigration and c*****e c****e.
Detailed Report

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Mixed Fact Checking
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 48/180

History

Founded in 2009 by Dennis Prager and Allen Astrin, PragerU short for Prager University is a non-profit organization that creates videos on various political, economic and philosophical topics from a conservative or right-wing perspective. PragerU is not an academic institution. It is strictly a conservative Youtube video channel and news website. The following disclaimer is located at the bottom of the website: PRAGER UNIVERSITY IS NOT AN ACCREDITED ACADEMIC INSTITUTION AND DOES NOT OFFER CERTIFICATIONS OR DIPLOMAS. BUT IT IS A PLACE WHERE YOU ARE FREE TO LEARN.

Dennis Prager is a Neoconservative radio host and columnist for the far right and questionable WND. Prager believes that Christianity is under threat from secular l*****t universities and therefore created PragerU to counteract them. PragerU has developed two partnership programs to help cultivate relationships with educators. PragerU’s Educator Program supplies teachers with lesson plans and study guides that accompany their videos. Additionally, secondary school teachers and college professors can register their classes through PragerU’s Academic Partnership program, which lets students sign up and allows teachers to monitor their students’ progress.

Read our profile on United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

PragerU is a non-profit that is funded through donors such as hydraulic fracturing billionaires Dan and Farris Wilks and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, which advocates for low immigration and human influenced c*****e c****e denialism. Other large donors all hold conservative views as well. The organization has a $10 million annual budget, of which it spends more than 40% on marketing.

Analysis / Bias

In review, PragerU publishes well produced videos that appeal to a conservative audience. The most frequent topics covered are anti-immigration, human influenced c*****e c****e denialism, Pro-Christian and anti-Muslim themes, as well as advocacy for free market capitalism and harsh criticism of socialism. Further, there are many video’s in support of President Trump. Most videos are less than 5 minutes and come from prominent conservatives such as Dennis Prager and some of which have very poor track records with fact checkers such as Tucker Carlson, Michelle Malkin (Anti-Islam), and Steven Crowder. Further, the right leaning Cato Institute has criticized PragerU for publishing misleading and false information regarding immigration. In general all videos favor the right and denigrate the left with the use of poor sources.

The website also contains an “In The News” section which curates news from other sources such as the BBC and Forbes. However, they also list stories from far right biased sources and questionable ones such as Breitbart, Townhall, PJ Media and Front Page Mag. All news stories are related in some way to PragerU, such as this: The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Smear Campaign Against PragerU. This particular story is a reaction to the SPLC calling PragerU an “indispensable propaganda device for the right.” They further state “PragerU seems to be yet another node on the internet connecting conservative media consumers to the dark corners of the extreme right.”

A factual search reveals they have Half True and Misattributed claims by IFCN Fact Checkers. However, several of their videos come from those that have poor track records with fact checkers such as Michelle Malkin and Steven Crowder to name a few.

Setting the Record Straight on C*****e C****e and Arson in Australia’s Bushfires – False
Overall, we rate PragerU Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda, the use of poor sources who have failed fact checks and the publication of misleading information regarding immigration and c*****e c****e. (D. Van Zandt 3/21/2019) Updated (1/19/2020)

Source: https://www.prageru.com
Really? br br https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prag... (show quote)

I love it! When somebody can't dispute facts, they just attack the source. Can you actually dispute any of what was said in that video? I don't think so.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.