EyeSawYou

Why haven't any of you Lefties posted about Bloomberg's r****m? If Trump had said the same thing ALL of you would be all over this in a jiffy calling Trump a r****t.

Huey Driver Loc: Texas

Asking them a question like that probably put them in shock.

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Get real Rac ... Lord Bugalugs has always loved Bloomberg's r****m.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/02/trump-who-loves-stop-and-frisk-says-bloomberg-is-a-r****t-for-defending-stop-and-frisk/

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Why don't you save some of those for an October surprise?

EyeSawYou

His mental disability doesn't afford him the ability to wait.

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Silly Rac he was talking to you. At least you don't deny Lord Babylon's true colors this time, so there's that.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

DOUBLETHINK allows them to believe that Sanders and Bloomberg are both democrats.

BigWahoo Loc: Kentucky

"Bloomberg should be running against Trump as a Republican, not a Democrat. If he actually cared about this country more than stroking his massive ego that is exactly what he would be doing.

This is not such a crazy idea. For starters, Bloomberg is a Republican, or he was until the tea party and then Trump showed up. He fits the profile of the sort of traditional Republican most Americans have been familiar with for generations. He is pro-business, pro-empire, anti-labor, and not especially sympathetic to the concerns of minorities or the dispossessed. These old-school Republicans were committed to the rule of law, however, and to majority rule.

Now Trump has come in and crystallized currents already growing in the Republican Party, like the “tea party” explosion in 2009-10. With his endless lying and rejection of the rule of law, Trump has led the Republicans toward a stronger embrace of authoritarianism, even, dare I say it, f*****m. There are discussions about whether Trump would even leave office were he to lose the 2020 p**********l e******n! The career Republican politicians have capitulated to Trump en masse, hence discrediting this party in toto."



https://www.commondreams.org/views/2020/02/11/if-bloomberg-wants-buy-e******n-he-should-run-republican-against-trump-not-sabotage

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

If your question was serious, you would not have phrased it using an insult by name calling your intended audience.
Not all liberals are hypocrites. Not all Republicans are so insincere.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

In your own words, using facts, what is your issue with the tea party?

WNYShooter Loc: WNY

LOLOL, Bloomberg only switched from being a life long Dem to Repub during the years of 2001–2007. He did it to get on the ticket to run for NYC mayor. He had to switch to Repub to run because the Dem party is so corrupt in NYC and he knew there was no way they would allow him to walk in and take the position of their preselected "Next in Line" candidate for the office. He switched parties again while in office, to Indi, when he decided he wanted to extend the term limits of his office to a 3rd term and the Repubs said no, that his time was up according to the law.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

The claim was l*****ts, not liberals.

All l*****ts are hypocrites.

Tex-s

While I generally oppose leftism sight-unseen, the Bloomberg clips are not r****t, at least all the ones I've seen and heard concerning the stop, question, frisk policies. I do not have the actual data to cite, but the percentages of crimes committed by various sexes, races, and income brackets is NOT the same as the percentages of the population represented by each group. Stop and frisk being the practice, day to day, in upper Manhattan is fine if the stated goal of stop and frisk is to stop insider trading operations, but because the policy was designed to stop violent crime by and against the poorest NYC residents, the operations were focused in the neighborhoods with the greatest reported alleged violent crime rates.

That the policy ended up being implemented in neighborhoods of color is not r****t. It's evidence that the people in charge successfully identified a target location and a target outcome, and to be complete, the violent crime rate in these neighborhoods fell appreciably during the era of stop and frisk, so the policy achieved its goal. To allow a poor person of color to suggest the policy is "r****t" is to allow that same person to (essentially) argue for a higher crime rate and a higher death toll in communities of color.

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

Yep

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

It seems they agree that b****s and inbred native Americans need to be thrown against the wall if they’s done gonna walks the same streets as white demoKKKrat folks. That’s what Massah Bloomberg say ... it prolly heps keeps us on the plantation and reservation.