Final image set from this group of Ms. VADA and Pattycumcakes.
Timmers wrote:
Final image set from this group of Ms. VADA and Pattycumcakes.
Pretty sure these shots just simply cross too many boundaries.
Timmers wrote:
Final image set from this group of Ms. VADA and Pattycumcakes.
These shots simply cross too many boundaries to be here.
Lou Salamon wrote:
These shots simply cross too many boundaries to be here.
To be, or not to be, those are the boundaries?
What are the boundaries?
What are these boundaries of which you speak? Your boundaries?
Whose boundaries?
Where is 'here'?
It is neither here nor there.
"No man is an island.
He's a peninsula*!"
*Jefferson Starship.
Timmers wrote:
Final image set from this group of Ms. VADA and Pattycumcakes.
What annoys me about this set, is it’s all repetition. Is there no creativity? Can they not move around & create a few different images.
One of these is plenty, sorry but it’s boring after number one. Broaden your horizons. It’s a waste of good models.
Lou Salamon wrote:
These shots simply cross too many boundaries to be here.
I suggest that you click "Un-watch" for this topic.
I think Bunko has a good point. There is some repetition and in some of the frames one of the models is looking away from the camera. They are not all key frames. But I can see different emotions in each frame so I understand why you posted all of them. But it is the artists job to pic what to show, knowing his audience, and also knowing that the general public has a limited attention span and understanding. This is not a criticism just a suggestion.
I like a lot (most) of the creativity of your material and am a kinkster at heart and deed. But I think you take c&c personally which a lot of it may be, though I don't recall you ever saying "thanks, that's a good suggestion". Anyway, you do have fans, including me, but we are all here to improve our photography.....at least I think we are.
Repetition, interesting take and observation. Ahh, my answer to this is YES! the work does contain repetition. No dough about that. Here is a compare and contrast from the past, Campbell's Soup Cans by Warhol.
There is repetition in both. Looking at the image4s of the cans there are differences in the title on the cans. In the case of the posted images of the two women there are differences in the expressions of the models. Oh and the fact that the model has reduced eye contact with the viewer, tis is an indicator that the other model is of more important. With the human subject, expression is quite obviously of great importance. Just like you might identify with one flavor of soup, you might connect with the submissive/ dominance between the two subjects in this representation of 'power transfer'.
Now to the criticism regarding my lack of notation for taking suggestion for altering the work, or ignoring suggestions on the ideas for improvement. Give me something that adds to the discussion for such things. Tell me to change this or that is just not helpful. The work is the way it is. I don't need suggestions of a technical nature, these are shallow and pointless. Yes, I said that so be offended, just do it some where else. Give me feed back if you like on what you see and what you are thinking and keep the technical information of others that can use it. Me I know the craft even if many in their arm chairs don't.
So go make some images and post them, other wise just sit back and try not to fall asleep at the switch.
Kozan wrote:
What a waste of time!!!
Typical response. It was a waste of time to bother commenting with a one liner. Too many on here feel compelled to make these type of comments. I know it is not that the brain matter processes in this fashion, rather the training to deliver short responses as though this is some how helpful or shows an engaged intellect. Looking at the sentence one wonders what is meant. What is a waste of time?
So I do believe I should begin not responding again to statements made to my OP, it is not etiquette, nor good forum, but there appears no real comments being offered. Rant on one liners, and empty headed slurs.
Timmers wrote:
<snip>.. Just like you might identify with one flavor of soup, you might connect with the submissive/ dominance between the two subjects in this representation of 'power transfer'. <snip>...
Now to the criticism regarding my lack of notation for taking suggestion<snip>..
Good point. Different people will like different images.
Personally, I don’t experience you as someone who is offended by c/c. Quite the contrary actually, you interact and engage in lively discussions.
Up coming for the next thread will be location with windows. I know, Mr. Bubbles is have a great day because my old worn shoes are at his disposal, but soon his lover girl VADA will be in the set.
I guess I should have anticipated that. Ever Onward!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.