Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Recent finds (Oh, geez how old am I!)
Jan 21, 2020 09:41:55 #
Here you go (and it might go on too long!) Going through old hard drives that filled up I found a file labeled "Bottoms" So you may see more bottoms ( not "butts" nor "asses" just because of how I grew up I guess)
Jan 21, 2020 09:54:10 #
Jan 21, 2020 11:04:05 #
Butt for the 3rd these are all great, with different perspectives. For having "vertigo" you have a great eye. <grin>
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Jan 21, 2020 11:39:14 #
Stardust wrote:
Butt for the 3rd these are all great, with different perspectives. For having "vertigo" you have a great eye. <grin>
You should see me stumble coming out of the Gate! Would the 3rd be better if it was in the "Hands" folder?
Jan 21, 2020 12:13:05 #
Jan 21, 2020 12:16:20 #
Interesting set of images, my favorites are the first and last images.
Jan 21, 2020 12:50:12 #
I like the first the most, despite the fact that it crops out her lower leg. How did that shadow appear in the last one? It looks odd, I am not saying bad, it is intriguing.
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Jan 21, 2020 13:47:38 #
toxdoc42 wrote:
I like the first the most, despite the fact that it crops out her lower leg. How did that shadow appear in the last one? It looks odd, I am not saying bad, it is intriguing.
Don't know. Obviously if I had seen it in the viewfinder I would have tried to not have it there but I didn't (sigh). I'll have to find the whole series and see if it is there in all of them, or maybe a clue as to what it is. Good point!
Jan 21, 2020 19:16:39 #
vertigo wrote:
To be serious for a moment I could see where you were going with the others and they were posed and composed well. To me #3 seems awkwardly posed and just doesn't project a purpose for the photo.Would the 3rd be better if it was in the "Hands" folder?
Jan 21, 2020 22:53:04 #
vertigo wrote:
Don't know. Obviously if I had seen it in the viewfinder I would have tried to not have it there but I didn't (sigh). I'll have to find the whole series and see if it is there in all of them, or maybe a clue as to what it is. Good point!
I suspect the light on the front of her body came via the mirror, and from the slight downward angle of the light the mirror did not provide reflected light in the shadowed area. The highlight of her hip above the shadow, as seen in the mirror, is the result of the direct light source.
There is a similar shadow on her legs from the side of the mirror.
All shadows would have been eliminated had you placed the light source more centrally and a bit lower.
Jan 22, 2020 00:05:55 #
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Jan 22, 2020 07:32:05 #
Stardust wrote:
To be serious for a moment I could see where you were going with the others and they were posed and composed well. To me #3 seems awkwardly posed and just doesn't project a purpose for the photo.
I was serious- in my reply. When I look, after your comment, I think the hands are beautiful and should be cropped into just the hands and go in the "Hands" folder. The smiley was just to say I took no offense!
Jan 22, 2020 08:08:14 #
vertigo wrote:
Don't know. Obviously if I had seen it in the viewfinder I would have tried to not have it there but I didn't (sigh). I'll have to find the whole series and see if it is there in all of them, or maybe a clue as to what it is. Good point!
May be a butt-insky?
PS., Good studies.
Jan 22, 2020 08:43:49 #
vertigo wrote:
I like that one too-I also made the sculpture.
An aside here on the sculpture, but many years ago I did a frontal body cast of my wife's torso that we hung on the bedroom wall for years. It was fun to do, and I was amazed at the detail that came through the layers of plaster and gauze.
Jan 22, 2020 08:58:03 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.