Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
User Report: Amazon printing 8x10 & 5x7
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jan 16, 2020 17:44:50   #
a6k Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
 
First I used my Spyder5Pro to get both the colors and the screen brightness right on my MacBookPro (I don't have my usual monitor with me). The MBP has touch-bar keys for screen brightness in fixed increments and I did not realize until later that I could have used the OS software in Preferences to get a continuous change in screen brightness. But I got it close enough.

Then, because I wanted to check how well it matched prints and because I wanted to use Fuji Pearl paper, I used Amazon. Other than for the cost of delivery, I don't know if my being a Prime member made any difference.

I am quite pleased with the result in that the colors are what I expected and the overall image brightness is what I intended it to be.

The interface for using Amazon to print photos is pretty simple and does not offer much but the 8x10 fits their size perfectly. For some reason, though, the 5x7 needed cropping at top and bottom (portrait mode). I don't know if the problem is my export recipe in CaptureOne or at Amazon.

The pics came in a cardboard flat mailer and the post-person ignored the clearly marked "Photos" and stuffed it into my streetside mailbox. Fortunately it did not damage the prints but it was a close call. The cardboard envelope was one of those self-seal ones with a thin strip of adhesive and it did not work so it could have exposed my prints to many different hazards. Not this time, though.

FYIO

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 17:49:01   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
5x7 and 8x10 are different aspect ratios, that's why a crop is required.

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 17:52:00   #
a6k Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
 
Longshadow wrote:
5x7 and 8x10 are different aspect ratios, that's why a crop is required.


Excuse me but this is either dumb or insulting or both. Did you really think I did not export that 5x7 AS A 5x7?
C'mon, give me a little credit. The Amazon interface, like all the ones I've used on all the photo printing sites, lets you choose the size from among standard sizes such as 5x7, 8x10, etc.

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Jan 16, 2020 17:56:50   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
a6k wrote:
Excuse me but this is either dumb or insulting or both. Did you really think I did not export that 5x7 AS A 5x7?
I thought the same as Longshadow when I read your opening. Based on posted topics, there are quite a few people on UHH who don't understand aspect ratio. Would it have killed you to be gracious and friendly in your reply?

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:10:32   #
a6k Loc: Detroit & Sanibel
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I thought the same as Longshadow when I read your opening. Based on posted topics, there are quite a few people on UHH who don't understand aspect ratio. Would it have killed you to be gracious and friendly in your reply?


I did not mention aspect ratio, just the sizes which I think everyone understands.

I already said in my original post that I used an export recipe. We all deserve more respect. Here is a screen print of one of the 8x10's and the 5x7 as exported to JPG. The relative sizes are wrong because that is how my system portrayed them in QuickLook.


(Download)

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:18:05   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
a6k wrote:
Excuse me but this is either dumb or insulting or both. Did you really think I did not export that 5x7 AS A 5x7?
C'mon, give me a little credit. The Amazon interface, like all the ones I've used on all the photo printing sites, lets you choose the size from among standard sizes such as 5x7, 8x10, etc.


Well, I sometimes export my images to Costco as the native aspect ratio and use their crop tool which automatically pops up if the desired print size is a different aspect ratio.

And to answer your question - I have no idea what you did because you didn't state anything, you could have! I guessed, and evidently I was wrong.
I tried to offer an explanation for a possibility. Shoot me.

Maybe it wasn't EXACTLY 5x7.......

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:20:00   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
a6k wrote:
... We all deserve more respect...
No, we earn respect. But we can start from a position of courtesy.

Reply
 
 
Jan 16, 2020 18:26:55   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
A 5x7 ratio is 0.7142857142857143

Your 5x7 ratio is 0.745

Maybe their computer was too picky.

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:28:45   #
rcarol
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
No, we earn respect. But we can start from a position of courtesy.


We'll put, Linda.

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:32:51   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
rcarol wrote:
We'll put, Linda.
Appreciated 🤗

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:33:20   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Longshadow wrote:
A 5x7 ratio is 0.7142857142857143

Your 5x7 ratio is 0.745

Maybe their computer was too picky.
LOL, you know I had to try it too. It's definitely not a 5x7

Reply
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Jan 16, 2020 18:33:31   #
rcarol
 
rcarol wrote:
We'll put, Linda.


Sometime spell check gets in the way. Obviously, I ment "Well put."

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:35:00   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
rcarol wrote:
Sometime spell check gets in the way. Obviously, I ment "Well put."
I'm so used to "interpreting" typos on UHH - especially missing and misplaced apostrophes - that I never noticed 😀

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:39:39   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
a6k wrote:
I did not mention aspect ratio, just the sizes which I think everyone understands.

I already said in my original post that I used an export recipe. We all deserve more respect. Here is a screen print of one of the 8x10's and the 5x7 as exported to JPG. The relative sizes are wrong because that is how my system portrayed them in QuickLook.


The aspect ratio of that image is not 5X7 by the way.

Beautiful images.

on edit - I see that others noticed this and submitted their posts before I submitted mine.

Mike

Reply
Jan 16, 2020 18:42:05   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I'm so used to "interpreting" typos on UHH - especially missing and misplaced apostrophes - that I never noticed 😀


Your one of the best poster's here, for sure.


Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.