Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
So you Republicans condone this.....?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Dec 17, 2019 05:23:55   #
McKinneyMike Loc: Texas
 
This has gone from bizarre to criminal!

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/rudolph-giuliani-ukraine-new-yorker-232152922.html

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 06:11:11   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
McKinneyMike wrote:


Why are you upset that Trump wants US law upheld?

Haven’t y’all barked at the Moon for years that we need to get to the bottom of foreign interference, no matter what?

Where did that go?

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 06:42:32   #
WNC Ralf Loc: Candler NC, in the mountains!
 
tRump is lawless, everyone knows it was Russia that interfered, except tRump supporters who just don’t want to know the t***h. No sense arguing with those kind of people so I will just let you be wrong.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2019 07:20:38   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
WNC Ralf wrote:
tRump is lawless, everyone knows it was Russia that interfered, except tRump supporters who just don’t want to know the t***h. No sense arguing with those kind of people so I will just let you be wrong.


Dude, seriously, read a ding diddly darned book.

Of course the Russians interfered.

The Russians have interfered in every US e******n cycle for at least the last century.

The Russians quite likely elected JFK ... I'll bet Rachel didn't tell you that.

That does not mean that the JFK campaign colluded.

That does not mean that the Trump campaign colluded.

There is no, zero, zip, nada, nein credible evidence that either campaign colluded.

Correlation most assuredly does not equate to causation.

The US definitely interfered in Russian e******ns in 2012.Are you honestly so arrogant that you feel there would be no blowback from this?

The Russians interfered on Trump's side and on Clinton's side.

The Russians almost certainly interfered in Russian e******ns under Clinton.

The Clintons and Obama have long, broad and deep histories of taking foreign money.

Charlie Trie anyone?

How about Norman Hsu?

To know of these events required effort to dig into the news, thats why you know nothing about them.

Now, in the present, your Orwellian handlers whip you into a daily frenzy of h**e mixed with ignorance and you post intellectually bankrupt jibba jabba.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 09:53:28   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
Just how many times has your head been smashed into the turnbuckle?

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 10:01:54   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Frank T wrote:
Just how many times has your head been smashed into the turnbuckle?


What part do you dispute?

Call me on it.

Please.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 10:22:12   #
RichieC Loc: Adirondacks
 
YEs, the Russians called the last e******n ROFL!

You could roll the dice a million times and not come up with the scenario on which the candidates were chosen and then how the v**es were tallied, and finally how the e*******l college delivered- and predicted the outcome- yet this is what you are selling.

Used to be widely scorned that Russia was viable- they were yesterdays foe- i can still recall the widespread ridicule at Romney's statement. Now they are the evil empire - greater than during the cold war! It is all so Orwellian- read the book if you haven't!

If Russia wanted someone to win, thought they could control it, and a lot of evidence points to this desire... it would have been HiLIARy... They already had the money pipeline and political infrastructure in place for her.... donations to her fund and Bills speaking engagements they payed twice the going rate for (Imagine going to buy a car- and then OFFERING to pay twice the price! this is something crooks do) -- all ended as soon as Trump was elected, and control of our uranium....

Any way you cut it, Trump was an unknown, unpredictable wildcard, no world "player" , who all much prefer consistency and predictability, ever wants to face.

Orwell and Alinsky rolled into one political party...

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2019 13:17:39   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
WNC Ralf wrote:
tRump is lawless, everyone knows it was Russia that interfered, except tRump supporters who just don’t want to know the t***h. No sense arguing with those kind of people so I will just let you be wrong.


Explain what you believe Trump did that is "lawless".

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 13:31:46   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Did the t***h hurt?

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 15:37:24   #
hondo812 Loc: Massachusetts
 
McKinneyMike wrote:


You don't really believe that Hillary's state department "lost" $5 BILLION do you?

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:13:53   #
foodie65
 
[quote=LWW]Dude, seriously,

The Russians quite likely elected JFK ................

and your facts to back this up??
I suppose the Russians elected Carter but not Reagan, HW Bush, or President Cheney

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2019 19:03:32   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
McKinneyMike wrote:


Absolutely condone it, what your article does is on use very loaded language to describe what Giuliani was doing in the Ukraine to impress you into believing that there can be no legitimate reason for his investigation, and secondly the article does not explore any of the evidence that Giuliani has that would explain his opposition to the ambassador and why he was investigating events that occurred in 2016 and prior in the Ukraine. Until Giuliani makes his case I think that we would all do well to not come to any conclusions.

I keep hearing that he was over there pursuing a debunked conspiracy theory, what I want to know debunked by whom, and what evidence is there that nothing occurred because Giuliani seems to have some evidence that things did actually take place in the Ukraine.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 19:06:53   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Funny thing about your graphic Rix, that big white headed MF looks a bit like you.... Did ya ever find what you were looking for?

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 19:08:00   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Absolutely condone it, what your article does is on use very loaded language to describe what Giuliani was doing in the Ukraine to impress you into believing that there can be no legitimate reason for his investigation, and secondly the article does not explore any of the evidence that Giuliani has that would explain his opposition to the ambassador and why he was investigating events that occurred in 2016 and prior in the Ukraine. Until Giuliani makes his case I think that we would all do well to not come to any conclusions.

I keep hearing that he was over there pursuing a debunked conspiracy theory, what I want to know debunked by whom, and what evidence is there that nothing occurred because Giuliani seems to have some evidence that things did actually take place in the Ukraine.
Absolutely condone it, what your article does is o... (show quote)


Rudy, the great crime fighter, will come up with nothing.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 19:11:34   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Rudy, the great crime fighter, will come up with nothing.


So,..... it is Rudy that wears his underwear on the outside of his tights.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.