Rep. Matt Gaetz falsely claimed that Pamela Karlan attacked Barron Trump as he made a fool of himself at the Trump impeachment hearing.
Earlier in the hearing, Karlan said:
Gaetz tried to claim that she attacked Barron Trump, “You don’t get to interrupt me on this time. Let me also suggest that when you invoke the president’s son’s name here. When you try to make a little joke out of referencing trump, that does not lend credibility to your argument. It makes you look mean. It makes you look like you’re attacking someone’s family. The minor child of the president of the United States.”
As you can read in the quote above, Karlan did not attack Barron Trump. She said nothing derogatory about the child of the president. She was referring to the fact that Trump thinks that he is royalty. He has made no secret of the fact that he wants his family to be American political royalty. He wants the Trumps to be the new Kennedys. The Trumps have gone so far as to think of themselves as America’s royal family.
Karlan was correct. Trump does think that he is royalty, but the constitution says that he is just a president, and the House has the power to impeach.
Matt Gaetz never fails to embarrass himself every time he opens his mouth.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/12/04/matt-gaetz-pamela-karlan.html
Then she apologized.
/end evil leftie dem lies
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Angmo wrote:
Then she apologized.
/end evil leftie dem lies
Which showed that she has character, unlike... you know who.
JohnFrim wrote:
Which showed that she has character, unlike... you know who.
You’re quite the character, John.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Angmo wrote:
You’re quite the character, John.
I'll take that as a compliment... also rare from you.
JohnFrim wrote:
Which showed that she has character, unlike... you know who.
No she doesn’t, if she had character she would not have said it in the first place. She also made a back handed f**e apology only because she experienced a backlash.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Angmo wrote:
You certainly would!
Oh, dear. You mean it was an insult? It was not sincere? Oh, I am so hurt!
Kraken wrote:
Rep. Matt Gaetz falsely claimed that Pamela Karlan attacked Barron Trump as he made a fool of himself at the Trump impeachment hearing.
Earlier in the hearing, Karlan said:
Gaetz tried to claim that she attacked Barron Trump, “You don’t get to interrupt me on this time. Let me also suggest that when you invoke the president’s son’s name here. When you try to make a little joke out of referencing trump, that does not lend credibility to your argument. It makes you look mean. It makes you look like you’re attacking someone’s family. The minor child of the president of the United States.”
As you can read in the quote above, Karlan did not attack Barron Trump. She said nothing derogatory about the child of the president. She was referring to the fact that Trump thinks that he is royalty. He has made no secret of the fact that he wants his family to be American political royalty. He wants the Trumps to be the new Kennedys. The Trumps have gone so far as to think of themselves as America’s royal family.
Karlan was correct. Trump does think that he is royalty, but the constitution says that he is just a president, and the House has the power to impeach.
Matt Gaetz never fails to embarrass himself every time he opens his mouth.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/12/04/matt-gaetz-pamela-karlan.htmlRep. Matt Gaetz falsely claimed that Pamela Karlan... (
show quote)
He is the current attack dog of the Republican Party. He looks good to those brain-damaged supporters that back the president.
RixPix wrote:
He is the current attack dog of the Republican Party. He looks good to those brain-damaged supporters that back the president.
Oh I didn’t realize you’re a Trump supporter good to know.
Kraken wrote:
Rep. Matt Gaetz falsely claimed that Pamela Karlan attacked Barron Trump as he made a fool of himself at the Trump impeachment hearing.
Earlier in the hearing, Karlan said:
Gaetz tried to claim that she attacked Barron Trump, “You don’t get to interrupt me on this time. Let me also suggest that when you invoke the president’s son’s name here. When you try to make a little joke out of referencing trump, that does not lend credibility to your argument. It makes you look mean. It makes you look like you’re attacking someone’s family. The minor child of the president of the United States.”
As you can read in the quote above, Karlan did not attack Barron Trump. She said nothing derogatory about the child of the president. She was referring to the fact that Trump thinks that he is royalty. He has made no secret of the fact that he wants his family to be American political royalty. He wants the Trumps to be the new Kennedys. The Trumps have gone so far as to think of themselves as America’s royal family.
Karlan was correct. Trump does think that he is royalty, but the constitution says that he is just a president, and the House has the power to impeach.
Matt Gaetz never fails to embarrass himself every time he opens his mouth.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/12/04/matt-gaetz-pamela-karlan.htmlRep. Matt Gaetz falsely claimed that Pamela Karlan... (
show quote)
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politicususa/Overall, we rate PoliticusUSA, borderline extreme Left Biased in wording and editorial positions and factually Mixed due to misleading headlines and a failed fact check.
letmedance wrote:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politicususa/
Overall, we rate PoliticusUSA, borderline extreme Left Biased in wording and editorial positions and factually Mixed due to misleading headlines and a failed fact check.
FOX News:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/"Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story se******n that favors the right.
We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting."
Now remove Shep Smith, Chris Wallace and you have EXTREME RIGHT WINGNUTS overall.
McKinneyMike wrote:
FOX News:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fox-news/"Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story se******n that favors the right.
We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting."
Now remove Shep Smith, Chris Wallace and you have EXTREME RIGHT WINGNUTS overall.
FOX News: br br
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fo... (
show quote)
"Now remove Shep Smith, Chris Wallace and you have EXTREME RIGHT WINGNUTS overall." << Possibly true they are extreme right wing but doubt it. Both CNN and MSNBC are much worse of having conspiracy extreme Leftwing nuts without removing anyone. Although, I do like Chris Wallace even though he is a lefty but he is fair to both parties.
JohnFrim wrote:
Which showed that she has character, unlike... you know who.
Also shows that she knows she spoke improperly, otherwise nothing to apologize for.
All three showed their bias towards Trump, just shows how students are being influenced by their teachers in school. Why don’t people recoil to that the way they do when a teacher professes Christianity in classroom.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.