The A838 Revisited.
I’m with Karin!
#1 has my vote.
The lower perspective with this image compared with your first one made a most dramatic, strongly impactful difference.
Coz in the Colonies
Thanks, R.G. Now I understand why I don't get on very well using my long lens for Landscapes.
I will read up on hyperfocal distance. I have read a little about it but didn't understand so will have another read.
H
Uuglypher wrote:
I’m with Karin!
#1 has my vote.
The lower perspective with this image compared with your first one made a most dramatic, strongly impactful difference.
Coz in the Colonies
Thank you Colonial Coz. Apart from the lower perspective, I used more zoom in this one (42mm as opposed to 32mm), which has the effect of making the distant mountain less distant.
Heather Iles wrote:
Thanks, R.G. Now I understand why I don't get on very well using my long lens for Landscapes.
I will read up on hyperfocal distance. I have read a little about it but didn't understand so will have another read.
H
Hyperfocal distance is all about maintaining DOF (i.e. sharpness) all the way to the horizon (infinity) while keeping close objects within the DOF. Even with a small aperture you could still end up with a soft foreground if you didn't choose your focus point carefully and just focused on the distant scenery.
If you don't have an immediate foreground to worry about then you can get away with a lot more (and use a wider aperture), but close foregrounds are good for adding depth to images, and a good foreground can lift a shot to a whole new level. I've found that finding a good subject is just the start of the process. Finding a good foreground to go with it is worth whatever time and effort it takes.
And don't forget that zoom has its uses in landscape photography. See my above comment to Uuglypher (and that doesn't include the possibility of capturing landscape features, or what are called "intimate landscapes").
David in Dallas wrote:
A838?
It's a road in the north Highlands of Scotland. It runs from the centre of the Highlands north of Lairg over to the west coast.
R.G. wrote:
Hyperfocal distance is all about maintaining DOF (i.e. sharpness) all the way to the horizon (infinity) while keeping close objects within the DOF. Even with a small aperture you could still end up with a soft foreground if you didn't choose your focus point carefully and just focused on the distant scenery.
If you don't have an immediate foreground to worry about then you can get away with a lot more (and use a wider aperture), but close foregrounds are good for adding depth to images, and a good foreground can lift a shot to a whole new level. I've found that finding a good subject is just the start of the process. Finding a good foreground to go with it is worth whatever time and effort it takes.
And don't forget that zoom has its uses in landscape photography. See my above comment to Uuglypher (and that doesn't include the possibility of capturing landscape features, or what are called "intimate landscapes").
Hyperfocal distance is all about maintaining DOF (... (
show quote)
Thank you R.G. for your further explanation as it all helps and more so as I too like Landscapes.
H
R.G. wrote:
Thank you Tommy. If you mean the scenery's appealing and the weather's sombre, I'd agree. That's a common mixture in Scotland.
Yep, that's what I figured!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.