One A Day, Day 118.
The images are in a fashionable represented by the time frame just after world war two. It is a styling, it is not my desire to do a 'copy', 'homage', nor the replication for that era. The images are such that they imply, they take a styling that is not even the main stream of that era. This is not Burial and Ives stuff. If it is anything for an anchor it is the mail order naughty that was deemed at the time just after the war, but with out the blush nor the duck and hide. After all it is contemporary and it is the now, just a bit watered down from the starkness of the 20th year in the 21st century. I made it, I like it and so it is as is.
Now, not the 'nice' calendar post! LOL!!! We did use the burgundy corset, and yes, that VADA took it home to be her Christmas morning "We better get up because the parents will be over soon, help me get these cats off me, Jason, where are you going, come grab two of these furry idiots! Come on guys, you can play in the paper when we open presents! Oh God, these sleepy cats!"
Timmers wrote:
The images are in a fashionable represented by the time frame just after world war two. It is a styling, it is not my desire to do a 'copy', 'homage', nor the replication for that era. The images are such that they imply, they take a styling that is not even the main stream of that era. This is not Burial and Ives stuff. If it is anything for an anchor it is the mail order naughty that was deemed at the time just after the war, but with out the blush nor the duck and hide. After all it is contemporary and it is the now, just a bit watered down from the starkness of the 20th year in the 21st century. I made it, I like it and so it is as is.
Now, not the 'nice' calendar post! LOL!!! We did use the burgundy corset, and yes, that VADA took it home to be her Christmas morning "We better get up because the parents will be over soon, help me get these cats off me, Jason, where are you going, come grab two of these furry idiots! Come on guys, you can play in the paper when we open presents! Oh God, these sleepy cats!"
The images are in a fashionable represented by the... (
show quote)
Six pics, two poses. What a waste.
Timmers wrote:
The images are in a fashionable represented by the time frame just after world war two. It is a styling, it is not my desire to do a 'copy', 'homage', nor the replication for that era. The images are such that they imply, they take a styling that is not even the main stream of that era. This is not Burial and Ives stuff. If it is anything for an anchor it is the mail order naughty that was deemed at the time just after the war, but with out the blush nor the duck and hide. After all it is contemporary and it is the now, just a bit watered down from the starkness of the 20th year in the 21st century. I made it, I like it and so it is as is.
Now, not the 'nice' calendar post! LOL!!! We did use the burgundy corset, and yes, that VADA took it home to be her Christmas morning "We better get up because the parents will be over soon, help me get these cats off me, Jason, where are you going, come grab two of these furry idiots! Come on guys, you can play in the paper when we open presents! Oh God, these sleepy cats!"
The images are in a fashionable represented by the... (
show quote)
Six pics, two poses, that's a waste of four pics.
I would have liked to see different post processing treatments.
Bunko.T wrote:
Six pics, two poses. What a waste.
Where are your nudes, Bucky?
Hmmm... where to begin. I love her breasts. That's about all I love of these shots. Your description of the setting is always so cryptic and bizarre and leaves me wondering where I can get some of the same drugs. The coloring is horrendous and your shots never seem to be in focus. For someone that claims to be a learned photographer, show us something we can applaud you for. Just my opinion, not meant to be hateful.
I like the old skool, gentleman's magazine, under saturated look. And although to find a lot of Timmers' prose too dense for my tiny mind to wrap around, his work certainly keeps this pocket of UHH lively. So thanks for that, and for your "game" models.
To all those who don't like what I do then why bother to comment, look all you like but the waste of time and posting space of why you don't like what you encounter, well you just play the fool. So, should you post some comment do try to stay away from the defamatory insights of asking what drugs I'm on or the many idiotic reparative and unimaginative slurs that that reveals your moronic observations. It does nothing to effect myself and my work. I find your input quite shallow and of no relevance.
Timmers wrote:
To all those who don't like what I do then why bother to comment, look all you like but the waste of time and posting space of why you don't like what you encounter, well you just play the fool. So, should you post some comment do try to stay away from the defamatory insights of asking what drugs I'm on or the many idiotic reparative and unimaginative slurs that that reveals your moronic observations. It does nothing to effect myself and my work. I find your input quite shallow and of no relevance.
To all those who don't like what I do then why bot... (
show quote)
I don’t understand why the little whiners on here that bitch all the time even bother to look. If they don’t like your work, then why don’t they man up, grow a pair of balls, and post their own nudes to show us how they do it. It’s easy to bitch and find fault with someone, but not as easy to post your own. And with some of their avatars, like Bunko T., what self respecting woman would take their clothes off in front of him anyway. I enjoy your work and the effort you put in to it Timmers. Keep it up. (No pun intended!)
cwp3420 wrote:
I don’t understand why the little whiners on here that bitch all the time even bother to look. If they don’t like your work, then why don’t they man up, grow a pair of balls, and post their own nudes to show us how they do it. It’s easy to bitch and find fault with someone, but not as easy to post your own. And with some of their avatars, like Bunko T., what self respecting woman would take their clothes off in front of him anyway. I enjoy your work and the effort you put in to it Timmers. Keep it up. (No pun intended!)
I don’t understand why the little whiners on here ... (
show quote)
I do post and have been told not to point out its porn dressed up as art...… And I'll agree with all above... Out of focus.... SSDD unfortunately..
will you be posting your nude images in defence??
cwp3420 wrote:
I don’t understand why the little whiners on here that bitch all the time even bother to look. If they don’t like your work, then why don’t they man up, grow a pair of balls, and post their own nudes to show us how they do it. It’s easy to bitch and find fault with someone, but not as easy to post your own. And with some of their avatars, like Bunko T., what self respecting woman would take their clothes off in front of him anyway. I enjoy your work and the effort you put in to it Timmers. Keep it up. (No pun intended!)
I don’t understand why the little whiners on here ... (
show quote)
Thank you for your effort to make your support stated. It is great to hear a voice every once in a while that is not laden with derision.
It's not nice to poke fun at a guy like Bunko, after all he is a least being honest by way of his avatar name; we must assume that, after all, with the use of that name bunko: "a swindle in which you cheat at gambling or persuade a person to buy worthless property, bunco game, bunko, con game, confidence game, confidence trick, flimflam, gyp, hustle, con."
Also, it's not that "they look', it's that they insist to post shallow uninspired comments, or worse, they believe that they some how have cart blanch to shove their moralistic opinions upon others. Then get their panties in a bind when one refuse to drop down into the gutter of their discontent.
Be not concerned, post away I shall. I hope to not stray into any area that the admins will object to, I take that seriously. So far I think I have stayed in bounds of the guile lines.
Okay, the drug content was out of line. I apologize. But humor me here. I ask you for a classic nude photograph.
flathead27ford wrote:
Okay, the drug content was out of line. I apologize. But humor me here. I ask you for a classic nude photograph.
Soooo, this is so to the point of what is so wrong about your posting. Do me huge favor and place me on the list of people who post on the nude net work of Hog that you will no longer open and be bothered with. It is vary easy, just look for that heading "One A Day, Day 000", it's why I created that heading.
While your feeling insulted, try to grasp this little ray of sun shine in response to your above post: "I ask you for a classic nude photograph", when did you decide that I was your trained monkey? You apologize for an insult and follow it with yet another? Clearly you don't get that I'm not here seeking your approval. Please stop insulting me and move on to your buddy group to get your fix.
JoeJoe wrote:
I do post and have been told not to point out its porn dressed up as art...… And I'll agree with all above... Out of focus.... SSDD unfortunately..
will you be posting your nude images in defence??
I don’t have a reason to defend myself, Joe Joe. I responded to Timmers, not you. I guess you got your lacy panties in a wad because you’re trying to defend yourself, eh? If you don’t like what he posts, then don’t look. Isn’t that easy enough to understand, even for you?
cwp3420 wrote:
I don’t have a reason to defend myself, Joe Joe. I responded to Timmers, not you. I guess you got your lacy panties in a wad because you’re trying to defend yourself, eh? If you don’t like what he posts, then don’t look. Isn’t that easy enough to understand, even for you?
Under your reasoning if you cant take the critique then don't post either... Another defender with not a single nude post...LOL... beginning to get a trend here...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.