Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
It seems like.......
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Nov 14, 2019 08:14:29   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
LWW wrote:
True ... but I love how they squirm when asked the simplest of questions.


They are kind of cute aren't they? Sort of like watching a Slinky go downstairs, end over end.

Dennis

Reply
Dec 3, 2019 17:32:18   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Then are you saying she is lying? I heard what happened just as you did. Are you telling us you think Nikki Haley should have joined in with Kelly and Tillerson in going against the POTUS just because you don't like Trump? I think she did the right thing in saying these two people should have gone to the President in person to tell him of their feelings. Then if they could not work under his command they should have resigned. That is what people of common sense and a sense of doing what is right do. They do not have to like what Trump does but he is the POTUS and deserves respect for the office if nothing else.

Do you honestly want America to be just another third world country where if the majority of people don't like who is in charge they can just oust him and put someone else in charge? Does America look like some South American country to you? Not to me and millions of others who respect and honor the U.S. Constitution we have been living under since 1789. Only you Liberals want to change it to some other type of government though this one has worked for centuries.

Dennis
Then are you saying she is lying? I heard what ha... (show quote)


They took an oath to defend the Constitution, not Mr.TangerineMan.

Reply
Dec 3, 2019 19:13:09   #
EyeSawYou
 
Frank T wrote:
Nicki Haley is protecting and promoting her political future.
She's a bright woman but defending trump will not bode well for her if she really does run for President.
Then again, maybe she'll be the GOP candidate in 2020.


Why do you continue to post fictional stories?

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2019 10:10:12   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Frank T wrote:
They took an oath to defend the Constitution, not Mr.TangerineMan.


Yes they did take an oath to support the Constitution. But that doesn't mean that they should subvert the Constitution by committing treason against the POTUS. There are steps to be taken and they did not follow those steps. They were not protecting America at that point nor at any point. They did not like their employer and attempted to rally someone else to join their cause. You know, just like John Wilkes Booth rallied a group of people against Abraham Lincoln in April of 1865 to get rid of Lincoln. While these two did not plan to assassinate President Trump they definitely were speaking in treasonous terms. If they did not like what President Trump was doing then they rightly should have spoken to the President and then if not settled they had the option to resign and then go to the press. In the end it was Nikki Haley who did the right thing and supported the Constitution. Sorry you can't see that.

America is not a third world s**t hole country like some of those in South America where Presidents are ousted because someone doesn't like his policies.

Dennis

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 13:51:33   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Yes they did take an oath to support the Constitution. But that doesn't mean that they should subvert the Constitution by committing treason against the POTUS. There are steps to be taken and they did not follow those steps. They were not protecting America at that point nor at any point. They did not like their employer and attempted to rally someone else to join their cause. You know, just like John Wilkes Booth rallied a group of people against Abraham Lincoln in April of 1865 to get rid of Lincoln. While these two did not plan to assassinate President Trump they definitely were speaking in treasonous terms. If they did not like what President Trump was doing then they rightly should have spoken to the President and then if not settled they had the option to resign and then go to the press. In the end it was Nikki Haley who did the right thing and supported the Constitution. Sorry you can't see that.

America is not a third world s**t hole country like some of those in South America where Presidents are ousted because someone doesn't like his policies.

Dennis
Yes they did take an oath to support the Constitut... (show quote)


You cannot commit treason against a President.
Read the statutes.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 14:09:50   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Frank T wrote:
You cannot commit treason against a President.
Read the statutes.


Yes, you can.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:17:30   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Frank T wrote:
You cannot commit treason against a President.
Read the statutes.


Why don't you point them out to us since I honestly believe you are full of crap. It can't be that hard for you to google it, copy and paste as I do when I want to show something. C'mon francine you can do it. thom might even help you. Maybe you can get t*****r boy to chip in with some knowledge too.

Oh BTW treason is not committed against a President but against a country. Maybe that will help you out when you start looking.

Dennis

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2019 16:33:37   #
phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO
 
Frank T wrote:
You cannot commit treason against a President.
Read the statutes.


Is that sort of like the liberal saw that says black people can not be prodigious?

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:54:26   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
phcaan wrote:
Is that sort of like the liberal saw that says black people can not be prodigious?


"Prodigious"
WTF?

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 16:55:21   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Why don't you point them out to us since I honestly believe you are full of crap. It can't be that hard for you to google it, copy and paste as I do when I want to show something. C'mon francine you can do it. thom might even help you. Maybe you can get t*****r boy to chip in with some knowledge too.

Oh BTW treason is not committed against a President but against a country. Maybe that will help you out when you start looking.

Dennis


Thank you for pointing out that I was correct.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 17:51:15   #
phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO
 
Frank T wrote:
"Prodigious"
WTF?


Good job Frank, good catch. Should be
Is that that sort of like the liberal saw that says black people can not be prejudice?

Foiled by spell check again!!

Thanks Frank.

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2019 17:54:50   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
phcaan wrote:
Good job Frank, good catch. Should be
Is that that sort of like the liberal saw that says black people can not be prejudice?

Foiled by spell check again!!

Thanks Frank.


Now that youve explained it in English allow me to say that your thoughts on this matter are apparently very confused. There is no relationship between what I said and what you heard.
Go back and review.
I'll wait.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 19:39:45   #
phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO
 
Frank T wrote:
Now that youve explained it in English allow me to say that your thoughts on this matter are apparently very confused. There is no relationship between what I said and what you heard.
Go back and review.
I'll wait.


The relationship is that neither one of them makes sense.

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 20:44:34   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
LWW wrote:
Yes, you can.


Section 3: Treason

Main article: Treason laws in the United States

Iva Toguri, known as Tokyo Rose, and Tomoya Kawakita were two Japanese Americans who were tried for treason after World War II.
Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely "levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby crimes including conspiring to k**l the King or "violating" the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that "there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war."[17]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution

Reply
Dec 4, 2019 20:48:10   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Why don't you point them out to us since I honestly believe you are full of crap. It can't be that hard for you to google it, copy and paste as I do when I want to show something. C'mon francine you can do it. thom might even help you. Maybe you can get t*****r boy to chip in with some knowledge too.

Oh BTW treason is not committed against a President but against a country. Maybe that will help you out when you start looking.

Dennis


You say he's full of crap, and then you say the same thing he's been saying?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.