Can You say Deadbeat!!
Oct 27, 2019 09:27:35 #
Let's hear your excuses for this. It's not f**e news. its public!!
Oct 27, 2019 10:06:27 #
MikeMck wrote:
Let's hear your excuses for this. It's not f**e news. its public!!
These are events for the citizens of these cities. Of course they are paid for locally.
Oct 27, 2019 10:17:39 #
yhtomit wrote:
These are events for the citizens of these cities. Of course they are paid for locally.
Sorry, but that is not accurate!
Oct 27, 2019 11:26:14 #
MikeMck wrote:
Sorry, but that is not accurate!
Tell that to your fellow citizens comrade.
Oct 27, 2019 11:43:43 #
Shutterbug1697
Loc: Northeast
yhtomit wrote:
These are events for the citizens of these cities. Of course they are paid for locally.
These events were trump campaign rallies, and as such the security costs are sole responsibility of the trump ree******n campaign, NOT the local city's tax payers!
It was trump who chose to talk about his campaign at each of these rallies, which makes the security costs the sole responsibility of the trump ree******n campaign.
Oct 27, 2019 11:45:15 #
MikeMck wrote:
Let's hear your excuses for this. It's not f**e news. its public!!
In my opinion it is inexcusable and he should pay up, he’s paid most of the cities but he needs to pay them all.
Oct 27, 2019 11:59:18 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
In my opinion it is inexcusable and he should pay up, he’s paid most of the cities but he needs to pay them all.
First good for you, every once in a while you don’t sound crazy. I hadn’t heard that the campaign had reimbursed anyone, but that doesn’t mean they haven’t. Do you have a list of municipalities that Trump’s campaign has made whole?
Oct 27, 2019 13:20:42 #
thom w wrote:
First good for you, every once in a while you don’t sound crazy. I hadn’t heard that the campaign had reimbursed anyone, but that doesn’t mean they haven’t. Do you have a list of municipalities that Trump’s campaign has made whole?
Rich coming from a drug addict that sounds crazy all the time. lol
Oct 27, 2019 13:23:28 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
Rich coming from a drug addict that sounds crazy all the time. lol
Wow, you’d think I had just insulted you. No matter. Can you name some municipalities he has paid?
Oct 27, 2019 13:29:31 #
[quote=thom w]Wow, you’d think I had just insulted you. No matter. Can you name some municipalities he has paid?[/quote
You did make an attempt at insulting me. lol
You did make an attempt at insulting me. lol
Oct 27, 2019 14:10:57 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
[quote=EyeSawYou][quote=thom w]Wow, you’d think I had just insulted you. No matter. Can you name some municipalities he has paid?[/quote
You did make an attempt at insulting me. lol[/quote]
Not really, but trying to explain would come across as an insult.
You said Trump paid most cities. I asked if you could name a few. You haven’t responded to that at all. If you can’t name any city he has reimbursed, say so and I will drop it. If you can, I actually would like to know. I don’t know that you are incorrect, but what you said sure is news to me.
You did make an attempt at insulting me. lol[/quote]
Not really, but trying to explain would come across as an insult.
You said Trump paid most cities. I asked if you could name a few. You haven’t responded to that at all. If you can’t name any city he has reimbursed, say so and I will drop it. If you can, I actually would like to know. I don’t know that you are incorrect, but what you said sure is news to me.
Oct 27, 2019 17:17:41 #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
These events were trump campaign rallies, and as such the security costs are sole responsibility of the trump ree******n campaign, NOT the local city's tax payers!
It was trump who chose to talk about his campaign at each of these rallies, which makes the security costs the sole responsibility of the trump ree******n campaign.
It was trump who chose to talk about his campaign at each of these rallies, which makes the security costs the sole responsibility of the trump ree******n campaign.
Did local citizens attend?
Oct 27, 2019 17:27:19 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
These events were trump campaign rallies, and as such the security costs are sole responsibility of the trump ree******n campaign, NOT the local city's tax payers!
Any evidence for this risibly false claim?
Of course not.
Oct 27, 2019 17:51:50 #
thom w wrote:
Wow, you’d think I had just insulted you. No matter. Can you name some municipalities he has paid?
You did insult him and you know it. Be honest for a change.
Oct 27, 2019 20:16:50 #
Shutterbug1697
Loc: Northeast
yhtomit wrote:
Did local citizens attend?
No matter how few local citizens might have attended, it was still a campaign rally, and trump's campaign is responsible for those security expenses.
If any former president had pulled trump's deadbeat stunt of not paying for security at even a single campaign ree******n event, you can sure as shooting bet that the opposition party would be screaming that "that ain't right!"
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.