Tri fecta
Oct 19, 2019 21:10:30 #
Still learning but I need to know how to size for clarity. One is 8X10 300dpi. The other is 4X6 300 dpi. I realize that 300 dpi is for prints. I want to know which one looks better on screen when I save (store original). All criticizing is accepted and duly noted. And my prints turn out Awesome...! Just wondering if there is a dramatic difference....Thanks all
The mantis missed the bee by 1/10000 of a second, and the hummer missed stabbing the mantis and the bee tried to sting the Hummer...!! LOLOL
The mantis missed the bee by 1/10000 of a second, and the hummer missed stabbing the mantis and the bee tried to sting the Hummer...!! LOLOL
Oct 19, 2019 21:44:03 #
First shot is sized to 8X10. Second one is 4X6 same post for both....Forgot to mention that … My bad
Oct 20, 2019 07:08:57 #
Darren01 wrote:
Still learning but I need to know how to size for ... (show quote)
Bottom, slightly sharper.
Oct 20, 2019 07:35:50 #
Oct 20, 2019 08:14:05 #
The only difference between these two files is the pixel resolution. One is 3000x4000 pixels, larger than anyone's high-def monitors. The second image is 1800x1200px that is closer to the screen size many of us use. DPI has no impact on the digital display. In fact, you can create image file where this parameter does not even exist as well as setting the value to 0,1,5,10,55,101 and another other numeric value, all with ZERO impact on the visual presentation of the digital image. Examples are presented in this this discussion: Recommended resizing parameters for digital images
Oct 20, 2019 08:58:26 #
Oct 20, 2019 09:34:27 #
Oct 20, 2019 10:09:17 #
Oct 20, 2019 11:06:30 #
Thanks everyone, having a blast learning new techniques. Can get a little daunting at times but fun none the less..
Oct 20, 2019 11:27:13 #
The only difference I can find is the resolution of detail on the larger image. In reality that amounts to the difference between Wow! and WOWWWW!!!!!!!!! Just one item; the shadow climbing the 'Mantis' back that leaves only the very top of the starboard tail spike in the light. Amazing, simply amazing. Thank you so much.
Oct 20, 2019 12:09:46 #
amfoto1
Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
Darren01 wrote:
First shot is sized to 8X10. Second one is 4X6 same post for both....Forgot to mention that … My bad
This should be obvious to anyone who clicks through to the download and uses the maximum enlargement view....
The first image displays much larger than the second image.
That's the only difference the different sizes cause, in this case.
An image prepared for printing at 300 ppi and then viewed large on-screen at monitor resolutions (around 100 ppi is typical), can appear "over sharpened".
Below is an example. It looks quite nice in the small preview size and pretty good when downloaded but not maximized... but appears over-sharpened at the larger display size. That's because it was sized for printing (8x10, 300 ppi), not for online display. When viewed online at the maximum possible here on UHH (i.e., on a computer monitor), it displays about 3X larger than intended.
P.S. I rarely upload full size images here or anywhere else online. I limit most to 700 or 800 pixels on the long side, large enough for online display but not for printing or any other purpose... to prevent copyright infringements.
Oct 20, 2019 12:17:22 #
Oct 20, 2019 17:52:48 #
amfoto1 wrote:
This should be obvious to anyone who clicks throug... (show quote)
Nice waxwing. We rescued a day old chick from the road and raised it. Eventually it went to Princton U to be part of an aviary. Fantastic little birds.
Oct 20, 2019 18:06:24 #
Oct 20, 2019 18:16:50 #
Strodav
Loc: Houston, Tx
Took them into LR and looked at them 1:1 side by side. The bottom pic is significantly sharper than the top one.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.