Angel Star Photography wrote:
Switching to raw from JPEG is easy and you will find that it opens the door to far wider possibilities of what you can do with your captures. You will need to do some basic editing such as sharpening, adding clarity, etc. but this would only be the beginning of where you can take images from there.
I jumped into Lightroom initially, taking advantage of the free trial, in an effort to salvage some images I had captured---no other opportunity to capture again. They were shot in raw and my version of Photoshop Elements did not work with Windows 10. Long story; however, I will add that this was my first time shooting raw and using Lightroom. I found the Lightroom interface rather intuitive and within minutes I had salvaged my images. That was the beginning and since then I have perused YouTube videos and courses on Lynda to move beyond the basics.
As to what to do with your JPEGs, Lightroom should be viewed as an organizer first with editing capabilities laid on top. Thus, you can use Lightroom to organize both JPEGs and raw images. I now use Lightroom to organize my cell JPEGs as well as my raw files from my Canon and this has allowed me to organize captures that were taken long, long before I started using Lightroom and before I began shooting raw. The organizational capability of Lightroom is amazing. I began with absolutely no organizational plan in mind---don't recommend this. Through Lightroom, I have finally organized about 75% of ALL of my images.
As an editor, I use Lightroom about 90% of the time and Photoshop in the remaining cases. If you take advantage of the Adobe Photography subscription, you will get Lightroom and Photoshop together. While these are two stand-alone applications and can be used separately, there is integration with Lightroom such that you can select an image in Lightroom, right-click and select edit in Photoshop, and when you close Photoshop, you are returned to Lightroom complete with your Photoshop edited image added to Lightroom. This further facilitates organizing your images.
Regarding the educational needs, there are many resources freely available on YouTube and I recommend doing a search there on Lightroom and Adobe has videos available as well. Lynda is a subscription-based resource; however, if your local or county library has an arrangement with Lynda, you will be able to access their content with simply a membership to your library. Don't limit yourself to simply your local or county library. Many libraries have inter-agency agreements. Thus, if your library resources don't have an agreement with Lynda, you may still be able to access Lynda if some other county or city library has such an agreement.
You should be aware, too, that Lightroom is a non-destructive editor. This means that no changes are made to your files themselves. Rather, Lightroom retains your changes in a database and applies them as you view your images or when you export them to share or print. Thus, you can always reset to the original or drop back to some point in your editing history if you wish to change your image.
Side note: You should consider monitor calibration, too, as you step to raw, using an editor such as Lightroom, and sharing your images.
If funding is a concern, there are alternatives such as Darktable, Lightzone, and RawTherapee to name a few. Regardless, I continue to use Lightroom and Photoshop. The Adobe Creative Cloud subscription of $10/month is well worth the price.
Switching to raw from JPEG is easy and you will fi... (
show quote)
"Like getting a new camera..." sums it up.
I do have to frequently shoot JPEGs directly for documentation purposes at work, and, being at least "absent minded" if not downright forgetful, I sometimes have a setting or two at the wrong notch. LR provides quick and easy batch adjustments on JPEGs as well, so even if you're not shooting RAW, it's a valuable tool. I don't see any reasons to avoid RAW other than speed of processing and delivery, so I do the bulk of my processing in LR (and occasionally Photoshop) on RAW files. If you shoot JPEG for reasons of speed of processing, I completely understand; I do the same. But if you're actually spending much processing time on JPEG files, you're limiting your possibilities. Rather severely IMHO.