Ugly Hedgehog® - Photography Forum
APS-C, Pixels, etc.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5
Oct 12, 2019 19:11:40   #
topcat Loc: Alameda, CA
 
Ed Chu wrote:
knowing this ( I have seen this in articles, before ), does it follow that the 20mp MFT cameras COULD produce a better image than 24mp models ( not withstanding sensors used, etc. ) ?


The difference in MP will never show up. I think that they went to 20 because they are better pixels.

| Reply
Oct 14, 2019 20:56:56   #
WDCash Loc: Little Egg Harbor New Jersey, USA
 
Ed Chu wrote:
so, as I understand it, lesser pixels allow for larger pixels, which should result in better quality; however, more pixels also adds to better quality; so, there is a trade-off somewhere, or, am I oversimplifying things ?


I'm asking the same thing

| Reply
Oct 15, 2019 13:58:20   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
WDCash wrote:
I'm asking the same thing


YES - there is a trade-off!

| Reply
Oct 15, 2019 15:44:30   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Few people realize that luck is created by a full-frame sensor.

| Reply
Oct 15, 2019 17:48:50   #
Bill P
 
LIFE is a trade out.

| Reply
Oct 15, 2019 18:33:10   #
WDCash Loc: Little Egg Harbor New Jersey, USA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Few people realize that luck is created by a full-frame sensor.



| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2019 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.