Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Larger prints from Sony RX100 Vi or Vii
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 6, 2019 11:49:38   #
le boecere
 
ggab wrote:
On a different note with the same camera, has anyone that uses a DSLR holding it up to your eye for stability have a problem holding the camera arms extended somewhat with lens extended shooting from the LCD?
I have found it awkward in the past, however I am thinking of buying a used RX100 to try it again.
Sorry to hijack, however I didn't feel my question warranted a seperate post.
George


With the RX100III, I often use the LCD when "snap" shooting, or when "shooting from the hip" ~ usually when there's no time to bring the camera to my face, in order to use the EVF. I purchased the III specifically because of the pop-up Electronic Viewfinder.

Reply
Oct 6, 2019 13:06:07   #
timbuktutraveler
 
billnikon wrote:
Yes, I have the RX100 II and make 20X30 prints.


many thanks..I appreciate it.
Larry

Reply
Oct 6, 2019 13:06:59   #
timbuktutraveler
 
le boecere wrote:
With the RX100III, I often use the LCD when "snap" shooting, or when "shooting from the hip" ~ usually when there's no time to bring the camera to my face, in order to use the EVF. I purchased the III specifically because of the pop-up Electronic Viewfinder.


thanks for the info...Larry

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2019 13:09:04   #
timbuktutraveler
 
Gene51 wrote:
Should be fine as long as you didn't shoot at ISO 6400 and don't crop too much. I've done a few uncropped images to 24x36 and was pleased (surprised really) with the results. As long as you aren't going to pixel peep the entire image for noise and faults using a loupe, you should be fine.


many thanks for the good information
Larry

Reply
Oct 6, 2019 13:12:10   #
timbuktutraveler
 
daldds wrote:
Both of these were taken at full telephoto with the Sony you are considering, then cropped about 50% and printed to 13 x 19 without any discernible loss of quality. Additionally, the coffee drinker was taken through a bus window.
I use the Sony as a walk-around here in NYC and elsewhere when I do not intend to primarily photograph.
It does lose a little definition at full telephoto (300 mm equiv) compared to the pro glass of my OLYs.


nice work!...many thanks...Larry

Reply
Oct 6, 2019 20:25:16   #
BillPillmore
 
Tomcat5133 wrote:
Can only give you my experience. I have had 3 "100"s now the Sony RX100 4.
It is a 1"s advanced Sony sensor. bonze X 20mp. And whatever magic Sony put in these cameras
they take sharp shots. A zeiss 1.8 lens.
The newer camera has been getting rave reviews.
I have had and have many Sony's camera's Their 1" sensor technology from the
beginning has been breakthrough. I have the Sony a7s II Full frame a great camera.
That is why I say larger prints will not be a problem. Past 16 x 20. Not sure but
I am working are starting to print and you don't need a 40 meg camera to get
a good print. Good luck.
Can only give you my experience. I have had 3 &quo... (show quote)


I have the Rx100m3 and I think it would be no problem as long as you are using low iso’s.

Reply
Oct 6, 2019 20:28:10   #
timbuktutraveler
 
BillPillmore wrote:
I have the Rx100m3 and I think it would be no problem as long as you are using low iso’s.


Many thanks....Larry

Reply
 
 
Oct 7, 2019 14:10:21   #
photogeneralist Loc: Lopez Island Washington State
 
ggab wrote:
On a different note with the same camera, has anyone that uses a DSLR holding it up to your eye for stability have a problem holding the camera arms extended somewhat with lens extended shooting from the LCD?
I have found it awkward in the past, however I am thinking of buying a used RX100 to try it again.
Sorry to hijack, however I didn't feel my question warranted a seperate post.
George


I've found that having a neck strap the right length to extend (brace)the camera against at display panel viewing distance helps greatly in getting steady camera shots However I still much prefer the eye level viewfinder with my arms (elbows especially) well braced into my abdomen and my feet set slightly (12") apart and at a 45 deg angle to the scene I wish to photograph. When a lower camera angles requires, I prefer to bend my knees or kneel. I've never laid flat on my belly to get a shot through the eyepiece. When the scene requires a camera position lower or higher than can be achieved with the camera held to my eye, I use the tensioned neck strap technique with the lcd screen tilted for maximum visibility depending on camera position . BTW I feel that your question is indeed worthy of a separate post.
P.S.: I still get far too much camera shake since I have essential tremors.

Reply
Oct 7, 2019 18:24:46   #
timbuktutraveler
 
photogeneralist wrote:
I've found that having a neck strap the right length to extend (brace)the camera against at display panel viewing distance helps greatly in getting steady camera shots However I still much prefer the eye level viewfinder with my arms (elbows especially) well braced into my abdomen and my feet set slightly (12") apart and at a 45 deg angle to the scene I wish to photograph. When a lower camera angles requires, I prefer to bend my knees or kneel. I've never laid flat on my belly to get a shot through the eyepiece. When the scene requires a camera position lower or higher than can be achieved with the camera held to my eye, I use the tensioned neck strap technique with the lcd screen tilted for maximum visibility depending on camera position . BTW I feel that your question is indeed worthy of a separate post.
P.S.: I still get far too much camera shake since I have essential tremors.
I've found that having a neck strap the right leng... (show quote)


many thanks for your reply...actually while not directly about my topic, it was very helpful as I have essential tremors also!!

Reply
Oct 7, 2019 19:26:49   #
ggab Loc: ?
 
photogeneralist wrote:
I've found that having a neck strap the right length to extend (brace)the camera against at display panel viewing distance helps greatly in getting steady camera shots However I still much prefer the eye level viewfinder with my arms (elbows especially) well braced into my abdomen and my feet set slightly (12") apart and at a 45 deg angle to the scene I wish to photograph. When a lower camera angles requires, I prefer to bend my knees or kneel. I've never laid flat on my belly to get a shot through the eyepiece. When the scene requires a camera position lower or higher than can be achieved with the camera held to my eye, I use the tensioned neck strap technique with the lcd screen tilted for maximum visibility depending on camera position . BTW I feel that your question is indeed worthy of a separate post.
P.S.: I still get far too much camera shake since I have essential tremors.
I've found that having a neck strap the right leng... (show quote)


Thank you

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.