Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Cameras vs Phones: Brief Insights from Consumers Reports
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Sep 29, 2019 12:29:48   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
I Scanned This One Page Article, Take A Look. Main take away: "But our lab testing reveals that a stand-alone camera - even one that costs $500 or less - still produces higher-quality photos...". The rationales are things we all already know about.


(Download)

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 12:36:32   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new thread on this burnt out topic in time for lunch.

Now we can discuss the source and who loves and hates the magazine depending on how accurately they assessed the new dishwasher they bought 16 years ago.

This has become the funniest topic about nothing UHH has had in ages.



I'm glad these insights didn't get lost in one of the other threads on the topic. whew!!

--

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 12:41:11   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Bill_de wrote:
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new thread on this burnt out topic in time for lunch.

Now we can discuss the source and who loves and hates the magazine depending on how accurately they assessed the new dishwasher they bought 16 years ago.

This has become the funniest topic about nothing UHH has had in ages.

Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new threa... (show quote)


That's why I posted it, because CR is not B&H, or a Camera Magazine. No spin to actually sell anything by CR. But true they may look at cameras differently than a photographer. This article was about Types, not Brands. And I know CR can be controversial to some people. Different strokes for different folks. And remember some UHH novices don't even know what a MILC is. It would have been nice if they had described terms, but I said it was brief.

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2019 12:49:31   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
Anything that takes pictures counts.

Reply
Sep 29, 2019 12:55:52   #
PixelStan77 Loc: Vermont/Chicago
 
Bill_de wrote:
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new thread on this burnt out topic in time for lunch.

Now we can discuss the source and who loves and hates the magazine depending on how accurately they assessed the new dishwasher they bought 16 years ago.

This has become the funniest topic about nothing UHH has had in ages.



I'm glad these insights didn't get lost in one of the other threads on the topic. whew!!

--
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new threa... (show quote)


I am ready for lunch.

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 06:15:39   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
Why knock it? It shows another valid viewpoint, which is always interesting!

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 06:55:59   #
BruceS
 
Phones take pictures?

Reply
 
 
Sep 30, 2019 07:08:20   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
Bill_de wrote:
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new thread on this burnt out topic in time for lunch.

Now we can discuss the source and who loves and hates the magazine depending on how accurately they assessed the new dishwasher they bought 16 years ago.

This has become the funniest topic about nothing UHH has had in ages.



I'm glad these insights didn't get lost in one of the other threads on the topic. whew!!

--
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new threa... (show quote)


Cell phone users are bringing it up. They don't care about DSLR's. They don't suffer the need to diminish other people who take pictures.

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 08:22:32   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
Why does anyone care what anyone else uses to take photos with? Are you really that insecure about your own choice?

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 08:34:55   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
LFingar wrote:
Why does anyone care what anyone else uses to take photos with? Are you really that insecure about your own choice?


Exactly. We generally don’t hear customers in a restaurant ask, “What type of equipment did you use to prepare this meal?”

Whatever camera works for the intended result is fine. I normally won’t ask...

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 08:52:37   #
wetreed
 
Bill_de wrote:
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new thread on this burnt out topic in time for lunch.

Now we can discuss the source and who loves and hates the magazine depending on how accurately they assessed the new dishwasher they bought 16 years ago.

This has become the funniest topic about nothing UHH has had in ages.



I'm glad these insights didn't get lost in one of the other threads on the topic. whew!!

--
Man, I was afraid we weren't gonna get a new threa... (show quote)


If you don’t like the thread, don’t read it. I have never seen this subject presented in this manner and find it very interesting. It’s not always about You. If you have something constructive to add do so, otherwise leave us alone. That is all I have to say about that.

Reply
 
 
Sep 30, 2019 09:19:49   #
aphelps Loc: Central Ohio
 
lamiaceae wrote:
That's why I posted it, because CR is not B&H, or a Camera Magazine. No spin to actually sell anything by CR. But true they may look at cameras differently than a photographer. This article was about Types, not Brands. And I know CR can be controversial to some people. Different strokes for different folks. And remember some UHH novices don't even know what a MILC is. It would have been nice if they had described terms, but I said it was brief.
That's why I posted it, because CR is not B&H,... (show quote)


CR has some funky scoring system that generally doesn't tell you much.

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 09:26:51   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
Let’s just face it as photographers. Lots of people don’t take pictures to have the best possible picture quality. Period. It sounds sacrilegious I know but it’s true. 😜😜

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 09:47:54   #
PeteWeez Loc: LSD
 
lamiaceae wrote:
I Scanned This One Page Article, Take A Look. Main take away: "But our lab testing reveals that a stand-alone camera - even one that costs $500 or less - still produces higher-quality photos...". The rationales are things we all already know about.


Main point about this CR report. There essentially is no report in the magazine. Look closely and you'll see that to get full report you need to be member of CR digital club which cost another $40/yr. Cr is starting to use the paper magazine as a teaser to get signups for their digital information. Sad.

Reply
Sep 30, 2019 09:51:07   #
BebuLamar
 
LFingar wrote:
Why does anyone care what anyone else uses to take photos with? Are you really that insecure about your own choice?


Obviously a lot of people care as I saw many posts regarding the demise of DSLR. For me I don't care as I don't work in making or selling either phones or cameras.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.