Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
The historical record needs no explanation
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 27, 2019 11:25:39   #
gmcase Loc: Galt's Gulch
 
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 11:37:25   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
gmcase wrote:
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions


Thanks for posting that, although the deniers will go into meltdown.

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 12:04:43   #
Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio
 
gmcase wrote:
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

That is one WHALE of a compilation!!! Pure Gold!!! Eco-pocalypse predictions have been so consistently wrong that you can virtually count on the opposite happening.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2019 12:42:15   #
gmcase Loc: Galt's Gulch
 
Elaine2025 wrote:
Thanks for posting that, although the deniers will go into meltdown.


All of their models, besides being tainted with misleading manipulation, have proven to be false predictors in every detail. Yet, the c*****e c****e mythologists, including every lying Progressive (redundant) on this site, keep the myth alive in the feeble minded through lies and deceit. Everything they run up the f**g pole and salute have fictitious foundations and several stories of lies layered on top. They are busybody liars to their core.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 10:50:10   #
lenben Loc: Seattle
 
A cherry picked se******n. One example - acid rain - no doubt a serious problem in the 60-70s which has been minimized by legislation to limit this problem . Successful intervention folks although the great orange one wants to peel back such laws. Some of the others in the list also have legal modification which has helped but soon will revert to pre-1960s conditions if current leadership has its way.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 11:04:27   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
gmcase wrote:
All of their models, besides being tainted with misleading manipulation, have proven to be false predictors in every detail. Yet, the c*****e c****e mythologists, including every lying Progressive (redundant) on this site, keep the myth alive in the feeble minded through lies and deceit. Everything they run up the f**g pole and salute have fictitious foundations and several stories of lies layered on top. They are busybody liars to their core.


Yes, they lie prolifically.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 11:24:11   #
Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio
 
lenben wrote:
A cherry picked se******n. One example - acid rain - no doubt a serious problem in the 60-70s which has been minimized by legislation to limit this problem . Successful intervention folks although the great orange one wants to peel back such laws. Some of the others in the list also have legal modification which has helped but soon will revert to pre-1960s conditions if current leadership has its way.

You picked one of the worst examples!

There were dire warnings in the 1970's about acid rain k*****g off our forests. Congress passed environmental laws to reduce Sulpher Dioxide emissions, a known cause of acid rain. But shortly after, in 1980, the Federal Government released a ten-year study of acid rain which showed that first of all, volcanoes were responsible for the vast majority of Sulpher Dioxide emissions, and secondly, I quote from their study, "acidic deposition has not been shown to be a significant factor contributing to current forest health problems in North America." Once the problem had been studied scientifically, it turns out that acid rain was not actually a problem after all.

https://www.masterresource.org/acid-rain/myth-dangerous-acid-rain/

Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2019 11:40:09   #
FrumCA
 
gmcase wrote:
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions


Great post. Here's a video where Tony Heller explains the climate alarmists fraudulent, manipulative practices.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEs31hNMebg

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 11:46:25   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
And they wonder why we question their motives, especially when their solutions call for government take over of a substantial portion of our lives and economy.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 12:08:59   #
gmcase Loc: Galt's Gulch
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
And they wonder why we question their motives, especially when their solutions call for government take over of a substantial portion of our lives and economy.


That is the essence their not so hidden core agenda. They could care less about anything other than controlling everything and everyone down to the smallest detail. They are hyper statist busybody vermin and are a serious threat to liberty and property.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 12:10:52   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
gmcase wrote:
That is the essence their not so hidden core agenda. They could care less about anything other than controlling everything and everyone down to the smallest detail. They are hyper statist busybody vermin and are a serious threat to liberty and property.



Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2019 13:26:50   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
gmcase wrote:
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions


We have a 97% consensus that you have posted a very useful link!

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 13:29:14   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
lenben wrote:
A cherry picked se******n. One example - acid rain - no doubt a serious problem in the 60-70s which has been minimized by legislation to limit this problem . Successful intervention folks although the great orange one wants to peel back such laws. Some of the others in the list also have legal modification which has helped but soon will revert to pre-1960s conditions if current leadership has its way.


BS.... Repealing of some regulation does not mean that he has repealed all regulations, as usual democrats are far from honest in their discussions.

Reply
Sep 28, 2019 14:00:11   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
BS.... Repealing of some regulation does not mean that he has repealed all regulations, as usual democrats are far from honest in their discussions.


Yes, they are. They have blind hope nobody will notice.

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 00:46:39   #
oregon don
 
some thing I read: NASA used to show about 0.5C warming prior to the year 2000, but they erased the pre-1880 data, and altered the post-1880 data to create 1.2C warming prior to the year 2000. They more than doubled warming via data tampering.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.