Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
If you think no civilian ever needs an AR-15
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Sep 26, 2019 18:22:38   #
Huey Driver Loc: Texas
 
If you think no civilian ever needs an AR-15

4 armed thugs against one disabled man. Tell me again why no one ever needs an AR-15 type weapon for defense that has rapid semi-automatic fire capability?

Oh yes, and a Democrat being exposed to facts.





Reply
Sep 26, 2019 20:10:25   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
If no one had any guns there would be far fewer deaths.

Reply
Sep 26, 2019 20:15:07   #
Huey Driver Loc: Texas
 
RixPix wrote:
If no one had any guns there would be far fewer deaths.


But people do have them and that's something you can't change

Reply
 
 
Sep 26, 2019 20:49:05   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
RixPix wrote:
If no one had any guns there would be far fewer deaths.


If nobody had any cars there would not be 40,00 deaths per year.If nobody had any alchol 88,000 fewer pople would die

Reply
Sep 26, 2019 22:04:26   #
Rose42
 
RixPix wrote:
If no one had any guns there would be far fewer deaths.


Maybe. But how would you stop this man with a knife?

Video may be disturbing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc7eHucECaU&feature=youtu.be

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 00:13:26   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Huey Driver wrote:
But people do have them and that's something you can't change


How would he have been worse off with a shotgun?

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 00:16:11   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Rose42 wrote:
Maybe. But how would you stop this man with a knife?

Video may be disturbing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc7eHucECaU&feature=youtu.be


I'm not sure why a taser wouldn't have worked, but he seemed to have come out OK without using an AR.
Few if any are trying to disarm cops, and if I were in a situation where it was a knife against a car, I would want the car, the guy with the knife might damage my plastic bumper, but I think I'd be OK. I've never actually hit an aggressor with my car, but I've sent a couple running.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2019 00:21:29   #
Rose42
 
thom w wrote:
I'm not sure why a taser wouldn't have worked, but he seemed to have come out OK without using an AR.


She said if no one had *any* guns. Not if no one had an AR.

You only get one chance with a taser and if there’s more than one attacker you’re out of luck.

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 00:51:32   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Rose42 wrote:
She said if no one had *any* guns. Not if no one had an AR.

You only get one chance with a taser and if there’s more than one attacker you’re out of luck.


They have their limitations, but your example only had one attacker.

I'd have hit him with the car. If he ran away, that would be OK too.

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 06:39:25   #
Rose42
 
thom w wrote:
They have their limitations, but your example only had one attacker.

I'd have hit him with the car. If he ran away, that would be OK too.


You wouldn’t have had the chance to hit him with the car. And he showed no sign of stopping.

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 06:39:40   #
sb Loc: Florida's East Coast
 
I would worry that any rounds from my AR fired in my house would potentially penetrate my house and my neighbor's house, possibly injuring or k*****g them. A shotgun or a semi-auto pistol loaded with hollow-points would be much safer for my neighbors and probably just as effective.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2019 07:12:08   #
dave.speeking Loc: Brooklyn OH
 
RixPix wrote:
If no one had any guns there would be far fewer deaths.


Absolutely!

Now, tell us how to disarm the criminals.

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 07:13:23   #
Huey Driver Loc: Texas
 
thom w wrote:
How would he have been worse off with a shotgun?


Most shotguns have a heavy recoil compared to an AR. The man in the article may not have been able to handle that heavy recoil?

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 07:29:08   #
BigWahoo Loc: Kentucky
 
Huey Driver wrote:
If you think no civilian ever needs an AR-15

4 armed thugs against one disabled man. Tell me again why no one ever needs an AR-15 type weapon for defense that has rapid semi-automatic fire capability?

Oh yes, and a Democrat being exposed to facts.


A shotgun with #9 buckshot is a much better home defense weapon

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 08:20:00   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
Huey Driver wrote:
If you think no civilian ever needs an AR-15

4 armed thugs against one disabled man. Tell me again why no one ever needs an AR-15 type weapon for defense that has rapid semi-automatic fire capability?

Oh yes, and a Democrat being exposed to facts.


Well, here we go with politicization and then on to ad hominem attacks.....

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.