Help me out
Sep 21, 2019 06:25:58 #
rjaywallace wrote:
“47greyfox” my reasonable question cannot be considered “rudeness” when the troll OP who posted it never bothered to respond. That rude non-response is exactly what I expected. I’ve been a UHH member for five years and have learned to recognize bologna with or without mayonnaise. Have a nice evening.
Is calling someone a troll.....rude or what?
Sep 21, 2019 07:16:33 #
rcarol wrote:
According to:
Is Irregardless A Word? - Everything After Z by Dictionary.com
https://www.dictionary.com › is-irregardless-a-word
Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means “without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship,” or “heedless.” Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less.
Is Irregardless A Word? - Everything After Z by Dictionary.com
https://www.dictionary.com › is-irregardless-a-word
Irregardless is a nonstandard synonym for regardless, which means “without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship,” or “heedless.” Its nonstandard status is due to the double negative construction of the prefix ir- with the suffix -less.
Why are we talking about the word "irregardless"?
Sep 21, 2019 10:54:26 #
rehess wrote:
Why are we talking about the word "irregardless"?
It was used by a member in response to a post. Then another poster stated that "irregardless" was not a word. I was pointing out that while it is a non-standard word, it is nonetheless a word. That's all. You may have to read some of the prior posts to completely understand.
Sep 21, 2019 12:56:29 #
rcarol wrote:
It was used by a member in response to a post. Then another poster stated that "irregardless" was not a word. I was pointing out that while it is a non-standard word, it is nonetheless a word. That's all. You may have to read some of the prior posts to completely understand.
but the detour questioning it's use/misuse, didn't identify where that happened, so this is really really a wasted misuse of energy.
Sep 21, 2019 14:15:32 #
rehess wrote:
but the detour questioning it's use/misuse, didn't identify where that happened, so this is really really a wasted misuse of energy.
I suppose. I was too lazy to do the research for you.
Sep 21, 2019 15:52:43 #
rcarol wrote:
I suppose. I was too lazy to do the research for you.
I guess I thought pressing 'Quote Reply' - as I just did - instead of 'Reply' didn't require any extra effort, but "whatever".
Sep 21, 2019 16:43:24 #
rehess wrote:
I guess I thought pressing 'Quote Reply' - as I just did - instead of 'Reply' didn't require any extra effort, but "whatever".
I did press "Quote Reply" when I responded to the person that said irregardless is not a word. Just like I pressed "Quote Reply" when I responded to yours.
Sep 21, 2019 17:45:32 #
rcarol wrote:
I did press "Quote Reply" when I responded to the person that said irregardless is not a word. Just like I pressed "Quote Reply" when I responded to yours.
I apologize.
The link was 'broken' by the @kenArchi comment at 22:31:57 that asked about the word without giving a hint of why the question was asked.
Sep 21, 2019 18:00:54 #
rehess wrote:
I apologize.
The link was 'broken' by the @kenArchi comment at 22:31:57 that asked about the word without giving a hint of why the question was asked.
The link was 'broken' by the @kenArchi comment at 22:31:57 that asked about the word without giving a hint of why the question was asked.
Thanks. That resolves the confusion I had.
Sep 21, 2019 22:16:23 #
I guess Linda [From Maine] and I can then discuss HYPERLAPSE (correct spelling) ad nauseum until we get sick of this rather gimmicky technique. 
Sep 21, 2019 22:39:42 #
Hamltnblue wrote:
A google will show what a hyper-lapse is. If he didn't spell it exactly correct, no biggie.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlapse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlapse
1995 my ass, 1882! Done to create what the UHH OP asked about. Different from the Motion Picture or Video technique.
Sep 22, 2019 17:48:52 #
papaluv4gd
Loc: durham,ct
dont need no literisy, got me a camera. speks fur itself. ya all have guud one.
Sep 22, 2019 20:08:58 #
papaluv4gd wrote:
dont need no literisy, got me a camera. speks fur itself. ya all have guud one.
Yew 2
Sep 23, 2019 09:10:58 #
lamiaceae wrote:
1995 my ass, 1882! Done to create what the UHH OP asked about. Different from the Motion Picture or Video technique.
Your example does not appear to be a hyperlapse as there is no significant change in the camera position. It is more a brief time or chronophotography .
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.