Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Vibrations??
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 29, 2012 17:13:12   #
Teacher Loc: Alabama
 
I recently mounted a Sigma 50-500 OS (Bigma) in my gimbal, locked in place. While on 400mm I lightly tapped the leg and saw the image really shake. I was using a Manfrotto 055CXPRO4 carbon fiber. I then mount the system up to an old heavy aluminum 3section Bogen and tapped the leg and got the same shake. I tried this with another al. 3-section Oben, same thing. Then I mounted the system on an Arca Swiss ball head and no shake! I have taken many photos using the gimbal head, some moving some still. So I guess I might be better off moving the camera or at least having my hands on it. I've experimented with leaving the OS on and off and saw very little difference. What do you think?

Reply
Aug 29, 2012 17:50:51   #
Danilo Loc: Las Vegas
 
In fairness:
That your tripods would not withstand being whacked with no vibration occurring is an unreasonable expectation. If Manfrotto/Bogen were to make a tripod to withstand that test, you would need help carrying it to your photo-sight.
A more reasonable test would be to photograph a scene containing fine detail, at 1/2 sec. exposure with a remote release and view the result.
I, too, would like the tripod that will fold up to fit in my pocket, weigh in at .5 oz., and dispense ice and cold drinks with the push of a button. Wake me up for breakfast...

Reply
Aug 29, 2012 19:42:14   #
Teacher Loc: Alabama
 
I agree. The long exposure would be a good test. I'm still amazed at the movement with just a very light tap. I've also noticed a light breeze will do about the same thing. Also a running car motor. I guess I need one of those old wooden, double leg tripods but weighs about 3lbs. I'm still looking.

Reply
 
 
Aug 29, 2012 20:56:17   #
RocketScientist Loc: Littleton, Colorado
 
Dare I suggest that a tripod is only as good as the connections between the camera and tripod?

I wonder how much play is present on the tripod mounts. I can see where a worn QR plate or slightly loose screw could cause problems. I have an old Davis & Sanford tripod that just won't tighten good enough for a long exposure.

Reply
Aug 29, 2012 22:06:23   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Teacher wrote:
I recently mounted a Sigma 50-500 OS (Bigma) in my gimbal, locked in place. While on 400mm I lightly tapped the leg and saw the image really shake. I was using a Manfrotto 055CXPRO4 carbon fiber. I then mount the system up to an old heavy aluminum 3section Bogen and tapped the leg and got the same shake. I tried this with another al. 3-section Oben, same thing. Then I mounted the system on an Arca Swiss ball head and no shake! I have taken many photos using the gimbal head, some moving some still. So I guess I might be better off moving the camera or at least having my hands on it. I've experimented with leaving the OS on and off and saw very little difference. What do you think?
I recently mounted a Sigma 50-500 OS (Bigma) in my... (show quote)

I went to my doctor a few weeks ago. I said, "Hey, Doc, when I move my arm like this, it really hurts."

"Then don't move it like that," he told me. :D

I'm glad you were able to find a solution to your problem.

Reply
Aug 29, 2012 22:25:52   #
Teacher Loc: Alabama
 
I haven't even mentioned mirror flop. When setting up for remote shooting (birds at feeder) maybe I can lock up the mirror if it isn't done electronically which may drain the battery.

Reply
Aug 29, 2012 22:28:20   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Teacher wrote:
I haven't even mentioned mirror flop. When setting up for remote shooting (birds at feeder) maybe I can lock up the mirror if it isn't done electronically which may drain the battery.

Most cameras will let you use a setting to delay the shutter about one second after the mirror flips up.

Reply
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Aug 30, 2012 07:47:43   #
BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
 
Danilo wrote:
In fairness:
That your tripods would not withstand being whacked with no vibration occurring is an unreasonable expectation. If Manfrotto/Bogen were to make a tripod to withstand that test, you would need help carrying it to your photo-sight.
A more reasonable test would be to photograph a scene containing fine detail, at 1/2 sec. exposure with a remote release and view the result.
I, too, would like the tripod that will fold up to fit in my pocket, weigh in at .5 oz., and dispense ice and cold drinks with the push of a button. Wake me up for breakfast...
In fairness: br That your tripods would not withst... (show quote)


You sure you want to go to sleep? It could pass in the night!

Reply
Aug 30, 2012 07:56:28   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
I rarely use a remote or mirror up for my tripod shots. But I always either apply downward pressure on the camera or grab the hook from under the camera and pull downward. The hook is meant to add weight to help with vibration and I've seen experts add a sandbag to top of camera so No vibration happens at all. But who wants to carry more stuff to the field.

Reply
Aug 30, 2012 10:07:39   #
Teacher Loc: Alabama
 
I agree. Another vibe source I've noticed is when you're wading a shallow stream with your tripod and set up for a shot, the water flowing past your tripod legs will cause shake.

Reply
Aug 30, 2012 14:48:18   #
coco1964 Loc: Winsted Mn
 
I may not have the best tripod on the market but if I leave the strap on my camera and it is moving it will affect the photo. Take off any unnessary straps etc and weigh your tripod down with your bag or a sandbag if you're at home.....

Reply
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Aug 30, 2012 17:23:48   #
shadow1284 Loc: Mid-West Michigan
 
You said you were shooting with the 50-500 lens. At full telephoto a heavy thought could shake the focus. I photo'd the full moon this morning on a concrete bridge. Trucks passing over shook the focus on my 150-500. Had to wait for the heavy loads to pass. Got real sharp pictures( soon to post)

Reply
Aug 30, 2012 17:31:57   #
jimni2001 Loc: Sierra Vista, Arizona, USA
 
Doing land survey work we would test to see that the compensators in our levels we would tap on the heavy wooden legs and watch the line in the level bounce up and down. If the shutter makes the camera shake that is one thing but tapping on the legs is not a fair test in my opinion.

Reply
Aug 31, 2012 09:16:26   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
coco1964 wrote:
I may not have the best tripod on the market but if I leave the strap on my camera and it is moving it will affect the photo. Take off any unnessary straps etc and weigh your tripod down with your bag or a sandbag if you're at home.....

I always carry two 25-lb sandbags in my trunk. When I go on a shoot, I carry the camera equipment, and my wife carries the sandbags. She tends to get annoyed when I don't bother to use them. :D

Reply
Aug 31, 2012 11:21:15   #
shadow1284 Loc: Mid-West Michigan
 
or, maybe she'd like to carry the camera and you carry the sand???

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.