I would never take my film to any place that kept the negatives. It doesn't matter if the photos show your new puppy or your wife's backside, that film is your property and he should return it immediately after developing it. I would have a little chat with him and if that doesn't quickly solve the problem I would consult legal counsel. If you think there is something "personal" on the film that makes it more imperative that it be returned to you immediately so he can't spread them around or whatever. If everyone shown is above the age of consent and they seem to be participating willingly then there is no basis for any concern on the developer's part. Some people just need to feel important and powerful. My sympathies are with you.
speters wrote:
Get your negs back, nobody has the right to just keep/steal them. Sue the shit out of them or beat the crap out of them!
Walgreens and similar enterprises now develop the film and return a CD of low resolution scans and discard the negatives. They also state that absurd policy up front which is why I use thedarkroomlab for all processing.
I was shocked when I asked Walgreens to develop my negatives and give them back to me. They said they don't give negatives back!
speters wrote:
Get your negs back, nobody has the right to just keep/steal them. Sue the shit out of them or beat the crap out of them!
Keeping the negs is common these days. I'm sure whatever the OP signed for when he got his receipt stated that.
I hate to sound harsh but you had no business taking 25 year old unprocessed film to the "drug store", especially if there were privacy issues, etc. If the negatives was discarded, it is too late.
Stuff like that has to go to a custom lab- there are several still operating. First of all they can do a "clip test" on a small section of the film to see if in may require special processing and to discover if, in fact, there is any latent image worth further processing and printing.
Of course, not returning negatives is a ridiculous policy- there is no logical reason to do that and it shows a total disregard for film photography- it borders on stupidity. If you have old exposed film or use film, even currently, stay away for thoses processing facilities and find a custom lab or do it yourself- it ain't rocket science!
A custom lab can process black and white film with aini-fog chemistry or push processed as old film can devalo fog or lose speed. Color negative and reversal films that were produced prior to the C-41 and and E-6 type processes, unfortunately, may no longer be able to be developed.
BebuLamar wrote:
The reason they didn't return your negative is just save the shipping cost of the film back to the pharmacy. Many places now would develop the film, scan it and send the scan (via internet) to the pharmacy for printing. I don't use those places as I only care about the negative because they never scan nor print the way I like anyway. It's a bad practice but so many places are doing it now.
When I owned a photo lab on several occasions encountered “adult content”. As long as it was not “illigal” in content, ie: child porn etc., we alerted the customer of the content And printed at their request. You would be surprised how many did not remember what was on the film.
As for the negatives, they should have returned them to you. It was your property blank or not.
First, do not use drug store Walmart if you want negatives. They only print so there was probably nothing there. I mostly purchase Ilford B&W file and purchase a prepaid processing mailer to send it to their lab. You can order but what you get back is the negatives and negative scans to a CD. Recently used some Kodak and Fugi film. Sent it to thedarkroom.com. Great service and again you get negatives and scans to a CD and they will post your photos on their website for 60 days for viewing download.
I recently purchased a vintage medium format camera. It had an exposed roll of film in it. I know it was old Kodak film. B&W. I sent it to darkroom.com. It had 2 frames exposed. One was multiple exposed. You have to wind the film after each shot. I am a member of my local Masonic Lodge. The good photo was taken inside a Masonic Lodge. You can tell from the dress that the guys were wearing that it was from the 50s. Amazing experience.
Buddy Love wrote:
I hope I don't offend anyone but I have to ask.
I recently found 5 rolls of exposed 35mm film in a box in the back of the closet. I took it to the pharmacy for development. They all came back with no prints and the developer keeps the negatives so I don't know what might have been on them.
Not sure I would ever use a service where I didn't get the negatives back. I'd definitely inquire a little more. Seems like if there is truly noting on them, then why would he even want to keep them?
Swampworks wrote:
Not sure I would ever use a service where I didn't get the negatives back. I'd definitely inquire a little more. Seems like if there is truly noting on them, then why would he even want to keep them?
It saves the cost of shipping the negs back. I suspect they don't "keep" them, they probably dispose of them.
RGG-Test-account wrote:
I do not care about what it in the film...
What I care about is under what 'reasoning this store allows themselves to keep your negatives?
THAT IS THE QUESTION.
It one time I remember they did not return "questionable" prints. Do not know if it was morality or legality. You will have to ask those that developed the film.
Fredrick
Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
Buddy Love wrote:
I hope I don't offend anyone but I have to ask.
I recently found 5 rolls of exposed 35mm film in a box in the back of the closet. I took it to the pharmacy for development. They all came back with no prints and the developer keeps the negatives so I don't know what might have been on them.
Here's the uncomfortable part: The film was used probably 25 years ago when my wife and I were much younger and adventurous. They could have been of an adult nature. Get what I'm saying?
My question is, if the pictures were of such a nature would the developer simply not print them and not tell me why? Or could the film be so old that nothing developed?
Thanks and I appreciate any opinions.
I hope I don't offend anyone but I have to ask. br... (
show quote)
Why don’t you ask the pharmacy what happened?
speters wrote:
Get your negs back, nobody has the right to just keep/steal them. Sue the shit out of them or beat the crap out of them!
And just how do you go about doing that? Most of the stores like Walgreens, Walmart, etc. advertise upfront that you get back small scans, not negs.
coolhanduke wrote:
When I owned a photo lab on several occasions encountered “adult content”. As long as it was not “illigal” in content, ie: child porn etc., we alerted the customer of the content And printed at their request. You would be surprised how many did not remember what was on the film.
As for the negatives, they should have returned them to you. It was your property blank or not.
The negative is mine and actually that's all I care for I don't care about the prints they make. However, it's a common practice today just to save the shipping cost which I don't think a lot.
The film-Negatives are Yours you have the absolute right to have them return to you. If this doesn’t happen easily it would be very worthwhile to hire an attorney.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.