It isn't supposed to be this way.
Aug 21, 2019 10:49:33 #
1Feathercrest
Loc: NEPA
robertjerl wrote:
Because every thing is so far away and the DOF is tremendous at that range plus the 1/3200 SS is pretty fast to kill camera movement. And it appears to be an extremely clear, calm day so very little haze or atmospheric disturbance to effect the image.
"disturbance to effect the image" "Affect" is the action, "Effect" is the result. You wording should have been "disturbance to affect the image".
Aug 21, 2019 10:51:02 #
jackpinoh
Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
With an APS-C camera, f/5.0, and focal length lens, focused at or beyond 422ft, everything beyond 422ft will be in focus.
Aug 21, 2019 10:57:32 #
Aug 21, 2019 11:30:07 #
jonjacobik wrote:
Yesterday, I was near Boston to shoot a flyover of... (show quote)
Past f11 you'd start losing some to diffraction, so f20 wouldn't help as much as you think. A little googling can find a chart showing sharpness at different f stops for most lenses, too wide you start to get issues, stopped down too much you start to get issues.
Aug 21, 2019 13:13:23 #
rmalarz wrote:
Ah, here's a bit to keep in mind. Processing photographs is a lot like cooking. One adds just enough spice such that if it weren't there it'd be missed. However, it is not there overpowering the flavor of the food. A judicious amount of adjustment to an image really gets that image to be noticeable. As a spice, too much and that's all one will taste.
--Bob
--Bob
Although my Italian mother in law would argue you can't add to much garlic
Aug 21, 2019 14:17:23 #
1Feathercrest wrote:
"disturbance to effect the image" "Affect" is the action, "Effect" is the result. You wording should have been "disturbance to affect the image".
Gee thanks.
Though I am a retired teacher, the older I get the less I care about correcting my typos in a casual setting. And this site is about as casual as it gets.
If I was crazy enough to go back to school for another degree then I would care, or in a formal letter/legal document.
Oh, did you understand what I was saying??? Nuf said.
Aug 21, 2019 14:33:59 #
amfoto1
Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
The original image didn't appear to have a color space assigned. As soon as I assigned it sRGB (appropriate for images posted online), it really changed the image a lot. Some slightly lightening and a little warming filter seemed to help, too. Be sure to click through to the download. To me the preview still appears rather oddly colored. The full size images looks quite different.
Aug 21, 2019 18:59:08 #
Pablo8 wrote:
Good use of a reference to using spice in cooking. However I cannot comprehend some 'Cooks/Chefs' (on TV) will ad 6 or7 different spices to one dish / recipe. I'm sure many spices are completely overpowered in these show-off programmes.
I cook and often add many spices to a dish. Added in balance the add complexity and don’t overpower.
Aug 21, 2019 20:53:20 #
Aug 21, 2019 21:38:45 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
IShootemWithaCamera wrote:
What is DOF ?
Depth of Field.
Aug 21, 2019 23:12:14 #
rmalarz wrote:
Personally, I'd be more concerned about the preponderance of a blue cast to the photo than the depth of field.
--Bob
Personally, I'd be more concerned about the preponderance of a blue cast to the photo than the depth of field.
--Bob
Well said. I small tweak of RGB would solve the problem.
Aug 22, 2019 00:18:15 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.